Literature DB >> 20624084

A comparative study between an improved novel air-cushion sensor and a wheeled probe for minimally invasive surgery.

Dinusha Zbyszewski1, Benjamin Challacombe, Jichun Li, Lakmal Seneviratne, Kaspar Althoefer, Prokar Dasgupta, Declan Murphy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe a comparative study between an enhanced air-cushion tactile sensor and a wheeled indentation probe. These laparoscopic tools are designed to rapidly locate soft-tissue abnormalities during minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The air-cushion tactile sensor consists of an optically based sensor with a 7.8 mm sphere "floating" on a cushion of air at the tip of a shaft. The wheeled indentation probe is a 10 mm wide and 5 mm in diameter wheel mounted to a force/torque sensor. A continuous rolling indentation technique is used to pass the sensors over the soft-tissue surfaces. The variations in stiffness of the viscoelastic materials that are detected during the rolling indentations are illustrated by stiffness maps that can be used for tissue diagnosis. The probes were tested by having to detect four embedded nodules in a silicone phantom. Each probe was attached to a robotic manipulator and rolled over the silicone phantom in parallel paths. The readings of each probe collected during the process of rolling indentation were used to achieve the final results.
RESULTS: The results show that both sensors reliably detected the areas of variable stiffness by accurately identifying the location of each nodule. These are illustrated in the form of two three-dimensional spatiomechanical maps.
CONCLUSIONS: These probes have the potential to be used in MIS because they could provide surgeons with information on the mechanical properties of soft tissue, consequently enhancing the reduction in haptic feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20624084      PMCID: PMC2956525          DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment.

Authors:  M Tavakoli; A Aziminejad; R V Patel; M Moallem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  A M Okamura
Journal:  Ind Rob       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins.

Authors:  Osamu Ukimura; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Air-cushion force-sensitive probe for soft tissue investigation during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Dinusha Zbyszewski; Benjamin Challacombe; Hongbin Liu; Lakmal Seneviratne; Prokar Dasgupta; Declan Murphy; Kaspar Althoefer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Rolling mechanical imaging for tissue abnormality localization during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Hongbin Liu; David P Noonan; Benjamin J Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta; Lakmal D Seneviratne; Kaspar Althoefer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Optical coherence tomography of cavernous nerves: a step toward real-time intraoperative imaging during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Adam W Levinson; Nathaniel M Fried; Gwen A Lagoda; Alexandra Hristov; Ying Chuang; Arthur L Burnett; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Second prize: preliminary experience with the Niris optical coherence tomography system during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Monish Aron; Jihad H Kaouk; Nicholas J Hegarty; Jose Roberto Colombo; Georges-Pascal Haber; Benjamin I Chung; Ming Zhou; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.942

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.