Literature DB >> 16897165

No evidence to indicate topographic dependency on bone formation around cp titanium implants under masticatory loading.

H Kawahara1, H Aoki, H Koike, Y Soeda, D Kawahara, S Matsuda.   

Abstract

In vitro studies have proved the topographic dependency upon osteogenesis on titanium plate by investigating the cell-adhesion, -shape, -proliferation, -differentiation, ALP activity and osteocalcin production of osteogenic stem cells, MG36, MC3T3-E1 and wild strains of bone formative cells from animal and human. However, this in vivo study on bone growth around cp titanium dental implants under masticatory loading did not demonstrate significant difference among the different surface roughness in the range of Ra 0.4-1.9 microm, Rz 2.8-11.2 microm, Rmax 3.6-28.1 microm and Sm 2.9-41.0 microm, which was estimated by measuring the bone contacts, bone occupancies and bone bonding strengths at the implant/bone marrow interface. It is revealed that the topographic dependency on the osteogenetic activity is apt to be covered with wide variation in bone healing potential under the clinical condition with functional biting load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897165     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-9683-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  26 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.

Authors:  J B Brunski
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1992

2.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology.

Authors:  R Singhvi; G Stephanopoulos; D I Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1994-04-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

4.  Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; L Sennerby
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 5.  In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.

Authors:  J E Davies
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1996-06

6.  Surface-dimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth.

Authors:  J Li; H Liao; B Fartash; L Hermansson; T Johnsson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs.

Authors:  M S Block; J N Kent; J F Kay
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies.

Authors:  A Wennerberg; T Albrektsson; B Andersson; J J Krol
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Both cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 mediate osteoblast response to titanium surface roughness.

Authors:  B D Boyan; C H Lohmann; M Sisk; Y Liu; V L Sylvia; D L Cochran; D D Dean; Z Schwartz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-06-05

10.  An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.

Authors:  K A Thomas; S D Cook
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1985-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Bone response to immediate loading through titanium implants with different surface roughness in rats.

Authors:  Naoko Sato; Toshie Kuwana; Miou Yamamoto; Hanako Suenaga; Takahisa Anada; Shigeto Koyama; Osamu Suzuki; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.634

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.