| Literature DB >> 21559264 |
Boris Michael Holzapfel1, Hans Rechl, Stefan Lehner, Hakan Pilge, Hans Gollwitzer, Erwin Steinhauser.
Abstract
Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism is essential for good extremity function after endoprosthetic knee replacement following tumor resection. Only a few biological methods have been able to reliably restore a functional extensor mechanism, but they are often associated with significant complication rates. Reattachment of the patellar tendon to the prosthesis using an alloplastic patellar ligament (Trevira cord) can be an appropriate alternative. In vivo and in vitro studies have already shown that complete fibrous ingrowth in polyethylene chords can be seen after a period of six months. However, until now, no biomechanical study has shown the efficacy of an alloplastic cord and its fixation device in providing sufficient stability and endurance in daily life-activity until newly formed scar tissue can take over this function. In a special test bench developed for this study, different loading regimes were applied to simulate loads during everyday life. Failure loads and failure modes were evaluated. The properties of the cord were compared before and after physiological conditioning. It was shown that rubbing was the mode of failure under dynamic loading. Tensile forces up to 2558 N did not result in material failure. Thus, using an artificial cord together with this fixation device, temporary sufficient stable fixation can be expected.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21559264 PMCID: PMC3087941 DOI: 10.1155/2011/545104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sarcoma ISSN: 1357-714X
Figure 1MML tumor knee for proximal tibial and distal femoral replacement (Modular endoprosthetic system Munich-Luebeck, Eska Orthodynamics GmbH, Luebeck, Germany) with the tibial fixation device for the double-layered Trevira cord.
Figure 2Test bench for cyclic load application on artificial ligament and fixation block.
Figure 3Load regimes for different activities.
Mean ultimate tensile strength and mean stiffness of the investigated fixation mechanism with Trevira cords. Tested as received and conditioned in saline (37°C) for 25 days.
| Ultimate tensile strength Fmax (SD) (N) | Stiffness Smax (SD) (N/mm) | |
|---|---|---|
| As received | 2558 (±40) | 136.5 (±4.9) |
| Conditioned | 2248 (±88) | 126.0 (±9.1) |
Figure 4Ruptured Trevira cord after quasistatic loading (a) and (b) after cyclic loading.
Figure 5Ultimate tensile strength of the artificial ligament fixed in the block.
Strength and elongation of fixed Trevira cords.
| Mean value (SD) | |
|---|---|
| Yield strength Flin (N) (start of the plastic deformation) | 768 (±42) |
| Ultimate tensile strength Fmax (N) | 2015 (±127) |
| Yield elongation dlin (%) | 5.8 (±0.7) |
| Ultimate elongation dmax (%) | 31.3 (±6.0) |
| Stiffness Smax (N/mm) (normalized on a cord length of 50 mm) | 343 (±50) |
Figure 6The Woehler curve showing the load cycles to failure for the two different fixation blocks (originally and modified) and different loading regimes.