Literature DB >> 16896745

First results with the trochanter fixation nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases.

A Lenich1, E Mayr, A Rüter, Ch Möckl, B Füchtmeier.   

Abstract

A complication rate between 4-18% for the conventional osteosynthesis of the proximal femur fracture continues to be unacceptable even if increasing age and co-morbidity of patients are taken into account. Therefore, new intramedullary techniques are under development, and we here report our results with the novel trochanteric fixation nail (TFN). During the study period (March 2003-February 2004) all patients with a trochanteric fracture Type A1-A3 (AO/ASIF classification) were eligible for the study, and 120 patients (mean age 81 years, range 47-100; male/female 1:4) subsequently enrolled. Most frequent was the (according to the AO classification) A.2.1. type of fracture (n=39) and the A.2.2. fracture (n= 39). Operation time from cut to stitch was 45 mins (minimal 21/maximal 194). Thirty-seven (31%) postoperative X-rays were classified as very good, 60 (50%) as good, 18 (15%) as satisfying and five (4%) as bad post-reposition results according to the Garden Alignment Index. The clinical results were documented by the time of hospital stay, postoperative mobilization and time of rehabilitation compared to the old social status. Time to hospital discharge was 17 days (9 /25). Overall complication rate was 7.5% (9 patients) with 5.8% [7] local wound infection; 1.6% [2] cutting out of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head. We had three (2.5%) hospital deaths in our patient group. We conclude that TFN is a safe and reliable technique. Compared with techniques like PFN and Gamma-nail, clinical results are excellent with less complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896745     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-006-0117-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  18 in total

1.  Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Samuel Bachmeier; Lukas Prantl; Michael Nerlich; Jochen Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Amir Andreas Al-Munajjed; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Ming Liu; Long Chen; Zhao Xu; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

4.  [Complications after pertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  B Füchtmeier; F Gebhard; A Lenich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Surgical prosthetic treatment.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Roberto Civinini; Marco Villano; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

6.  Advances in the surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the upper femur.

Authors:  Francesco Muncibì; Veronica Petrai; Lorenzo Nistri; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

7.  Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Kayla Pfaff; Michael Heffner; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Malcolm R DeBaun; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-15

8.  Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jin-Song Pu; Lei Liu; Guang-Lin Wang; Yue Fang; Tian-Fu Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.

Authors:  Xavier Lizano-Díez; Marius Johann Baptist Keel; Klaus Arno Siebenrock; Marc Tey; Johannes Dominik Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Results of proximal femur nail antirotation for low velocity trochanteric fractures in elderly.

Authors:  Ashok Sunil Gavaskar; Muthukumar Subramanian; Naveen Chowdary Tummala
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.