Literature DB >> 31900496

Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.

Xavier Lizano-Díez1, Marius Johann Baptist Keel2,3, Klaus Arno Siebenrock2, Marc Tey4, Johannes Dominik Bastian5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal rehabilitation treatment after surgery for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures is challenging in elderly patients.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to analyse the existing literature on available rehabilitation protocols with regards to permitting or restricting early weight bearing following fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures treated by the use of cephalomedullary nails in patients at least 65 years of age.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed based on the checklist of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies published between 1948 and 2018 on elderly patients with unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails that offered information on the postoperative rehabilitation protocol have been selected. Subsequently, the results and complications have been analysed according to the protocols.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 7056 initial articles have been selected for analysis. Authors who did not restrict weight bearing to their patients reported a shorter hospitalization time and a lower orthopaedic complication rate but a greater systemic complication rate, worse functional scores, and a higher reoperation and mortality rates. Those results should be taken with caution because of the heterogeneity of provided clinical information and the fact that none of the included studies considered the different rehabilitation protocols as study variables to analyse its influence on the results.
CONCLUSION: With evidence available to date, there is no clear agreement on the postoperative rehabilitation protocol following fixation of an unstable trochanteric fracture by cephalomedullary nail in the elderly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aftercare; Nail; Rehabilitation; Trochanteric; Unstable; Weight bearing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31900496     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01294-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  49 in total

1.  Functional recovery after hip fracture in old-old elderly patients.

Authors:  Zeev Arinzon; Zeev Fidelman; Aneta Zuta; Alexandr Peisakh; Yitshal N Berner
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Stability of extracapsular hip fracture: Does it affect rehabilitation outcome of post-acute patients?

Authors:  Avital Hershkovitz; Shai Brill; Lior Neuhaus Sulam; Tal Luria; Snir Heller
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-09

Review 4.  Management of Acute Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Marc Swiontkowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Low effectiveness of prescribed partial weight bearing. Continuous recording of vertical loads using a new pressure-sensitive insole.

Authors:  M Tveit; J Kärrholm
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the lower extremity--is it achievable?

Authors:  Attila Vasarhelyi; Tobias Baumert; Christoph Fritsch; Werner Hopfenmüller; Georg Gradl; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Jie Wang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  High reliability of an algorithm for choice of implants in hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Henrik Palm; Eva Posner; Hans-Ulrik Ahler-Toftehøj; Peter Siesing; Silas Gylvin; Tobias Aasvang; Kim Holck; Kenneth Brian Holtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection.

Authors:  C Cooper; G Campion; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register.

Authors:  Leif Mattisson; Alicja Bojan; Anders Enocson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Results of revision intramedullary nailing with and without auxillary plate in aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric nonunion.

Authors:  Dorien Schneidmueller; Christian von Rüden; Christina Dietze; Andreas Brand; Jan Friederichs; Fabian Stuby
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  New Prognostic Factors in Operated Extracapsular Hip Fractures: Infection and GammaTScore.

Authors:  Carlos Hernández-Pascual; José Ángel Santos-Sánchez; Jorge Hernández-Rodríguez; Carlos Fernando Silva-Viamonte; Carmen Pablos-Hernández; Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; José Antonio Mirón-Canelo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.