Literature DB >> 16896004

Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer.

Kenneth R Hess1, Keith Anderson, W Fraser Symmans, Vicente Valero, Nuhad Ibrahim, Jaime A Mejia, Daniel Booser, Richard L Theriault, Aman U Buzdar, Peter J Dempsey, Roman Rouzier, Nour Sneige, Jeffrey S Ross, Tatiana Vidaurre, Henry L Gómez, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a multigene predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative weekly paclitaxel and fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (T/FAC) chemotherapy and assessed its predictive accuracy on independent cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-three patients with stage I-III breast cancer were included. Pretreatment gene expression profiling was performed with oligonecleotide microarrays on fine-needle aspiration specimens. We developed predictors of pCR from 82 cases and assessed accuracy on 51 independent cases.
RESULTS: Overall pCR rate was 26% in both cohorts. In the training set, 56 probes were identified as differentially expressed between pCR versus residual disease, at a false discovery rate of 1%. We examined the performance of 780 distinct classifiers (set of genes + prediction algorithm) in full cross-validation. Many predictors performed equally well. A nominally best 30-probe set Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier was selected for independent validation. It showed significantly higher sensitivity (92% v 61%) than a clinical predictor including age, grade, and estrogen receptor status. The negative predictive value (96% v 86%) and area under the curve (0.877 v 0.811) were nominally better but not statistically significant. The combination of genomic and clinical information yielded a predictor not significantly different from the genomic predictor alone. In 31 samples, RNA was hybridized in replicate with resulting predictions that were 97% concordant.
CONCLUSION: A 30-probe set pharmacogenomic predictor predicted pCR to T/FAC chemotherapy with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. This test correctly identified all but one of the patients who achieved pCR (12 of 13 patients) and all but one of those who were predicted to have residual disease had residual cancer (27 of 28 patients).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16896004     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  259 in total

Review 1.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Using a stem cell-based signature to guide therapeutic selection in cancer.

Authors:  Igor Shats; Michael L Gatza; Jeffrey T Chang; Seiichi Mori; Jialiang Wang; Jeremy Rich; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The transcription factor ZNF217 is a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target during breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Laurie E Littlepage; Adam S Adler; Hosein Kouros-Mehr; Guiqing Huang; Jonathan Chou; Sheryl R Krig; Obi L Griffith; James E Korkola; Kun Qu; Devon A Lawson; Qing Xue; Mark D Sternlicht; Gerrit J P Dijkgraaf; Paul Yaswen; Hope S Rugo; Colleen A Sweeney; Colin C Collins; Joe W Gray; Howard Y Chang; Zena Werb
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  TIM-3 Regulates CD103+ Dendritic Cell Function and Response to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Álvaro de Mingo Pulido; Alycia Gardner; Shandi Hiebler; Hatem Soliman; Hope S Rugo; Matthew F Krummel; Lisa M Coussens; Brian Ruffell
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  The transcription factor snail mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transitions by repression of estrogen receptor-alpha.

Authors:  Archana Dhasarathy; Masahiro Kajita; Paul A Wade
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-08-30

6.  Radiation-induced gene signature predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Oh; Maggie C U Cheang; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Testing violations of the exponential assumption in cancer clinical trials with survival endpoints.

Authors:  Gang Han; Michael J Schell; Heping Zhang; Daniel Zelterman; Lajos Pusztai; Kerin Adelson; Christos Hatzis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Genomic markers for decision making: what is preventing us from using markers?

Authors:  Vicky M Coyle; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.