Literature DB >> 31091424

Adaptation and visual discomfort from flicker.

Sanae Yoshimoto1, Fang Jiang2, Tatsuto Takeuchi3, Arnold J Wilkins4, Michael A Webster5.   

Abstract

Spatial images with unnatural amplitude spectra tend to appear uncomfortable. Analogous effects are found in the temporal domain, yet discomfort in flickering patterns is also strongly dependent on the phase spectrum. Here we examined how discomfort in temporal flicker is affected by adaptation to different amplitude and phase spectra. Adapting and test flicker were square wave or random phase transitions in a uniform field filtered by increasing (blurred) or decreasing (sharpened) the slope of the amplitude spectrum. Participants rated the level of discomfort or sharpness/blur for the test flicker. Before adaptation, square wave transitions were rated as most comfortable when they had "focused" edges, which were defined as characterized by 1/f amplitude spectra, while random phase transitions instead appeared more comfortable the more blurred they were. After adapting to blurred or sharpened transitions, both square wave and random phase flicker appeared more sharpened or blurred, respectively, and these effects were consistent with renormalization of perceived temporal focus. In comparison, adaptation affected discomfort in the two waveforms in qualitatively different ways, and exposure to the adapting stimulus tended to increase rather than decreased its perceived discomfort. These results point to a dissociation between the perceived amplitude spectrum and perceived discomfort, suggesting they in part depend on distinct processes. The results further illustrate the importance of the phase spectrum in determining visual discomfort from flickering patterns.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Amplitude spectrum; Flicker; Phase spectrum; Temporal frequency; Visual discomfort

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31091424      PMCID: PMC7153578          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.

Authors:  Stephen Olejnik; James Algina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?

Authors:  Joseph J Atick
Journal:  Network       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  Visual discomfort and flicker.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Jesel Garcia; Fang Jiang; Arnold J Wilkins; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye movement and pupil size constriction under discomfort glare.

Authors:  Yandan Lin; Steve Fotios; Minchen Wei; Yihong Liu; Weihong Guo; Yaojie Sun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Flicker-glare and visual-comfort assessments of light emitting diode billboards.

Authors:  Meng-Wei Lin; Pin-Hsuan Hsieh; Erik C Chang; Yi-Chun Chen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast.

Authors:  M A Georgeson
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1985

8.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; S B Laughlin; A Dubs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-11-22

9.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Mark A Georgeson; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Pattern specificity of contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-02-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Anchal Lal; Neha Dave; Samia Kazi; Paul Mitchell; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2022-03-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.