Literature DB >> 16894640

Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.

Virendra Kumar1, N R Jagannathan, Rajeev Kumar, Sanjay Thulkar, S Dutta Gupta, A K Hemal, N P Gupta.   

Abstract

Results of the evaluation of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided needle biopsy of voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in a large cohort of men (n = 83) with abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) [prostate specific antigen (PSA) 0-4 ng/ml] or PSA less than 10 ng/ml, are reported. Three-dimensional (1)H MRSI was carried out at 1.5 T using a pelvic-phased array coil in combination with an endorectal surface coil. Voxels were classified as suspicious of malignancy based on Cit/(Cho + Cr) metabolite ratio. TRUS-guided biopsy of suspicious voxels was performed using the z- and x-coordinates obtained from MR images and two to three cores were taken from the suspected site. A systematic sextant biopsy was also carried out. MRSI showed voxels suspicious of malignancy in 44 patients while biopsy revealed cancer in 11 patients (25%). Patients who were negative for malignancy on MRSI were also negative on biopsy. An overall sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 54%, negative predictive value of 100% and accuracy of 60% were obtained. The site of biopsy was confirmed (n = 20) as a hypo-intense area on repeat MRI while repeat MRSI revealed high choline and low citrate. The overall success rate of MRI-directed TRUS-guided biopsy of 25% was higher compared with a 9% success rate achieved without MR guidance in another group of 120 patients. Our results indicate that TRUS-guided biopsy of suspicious area identified as malignant from MRSI can be performed using the coordinates of the voxel derived from MR images. This increases the detection rate of prostate cancer in men with PSA level <10 ng/ml or abnormal DRE and also demonstrates the potential of MR in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16894640     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  10 in total

Review 1.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Kirkham; Manit Arya; Rowland Illing; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Biophysical review's 'meet the editors series'-a profile of Naranamangalam R. Jagannathan.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-05-27

Review 3.  A decade in prostate cancer: from NMR to metabolomics.

Authors:  Elita M DeFeo; Chin-Lee Wu; W Scott McDougal; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; B Nicolas Bloch; David F Yao; Martin G Sanda; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Ivan Pedrosa; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Imaging and intervention in prostate cancer: Current perspectives and future trends.

Authors:  Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2014-04

9.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Chen Yegang; Yang Yongjiao; Xu Yawei; Kang Jiaqi; Wang Xianhao; Song Yuxuan; Hu Rui; Zhang Wei; Ou Ningjing
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A positive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with negative initial biopsy may predict future detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi; Virendra Kumar; Tarun Javali; Amit K Dinda; Sanjay Thulkar; Naranmangalam R Jagannathan; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.