Literature DB >> 16893473

Identification of differentially expressed genes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by microarray expression profiling.

Ingo Nindl1, Chantip Dang, Tobias Forschner, Ralf J Kuban, Thomas Meyer, Wolfram Sterry, Eggert Stockfleth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carcinogenesis is a multi-step process indicated by several genes up- or down-regulated during tumor progression. This study examined and identified differentially expressed genes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
RESULTS: Three different biopsies of 5 immunosuppressed organ-transplanted recipients each normal skin (all were pooled), actinic keratosis (AK) (two were pooled), and invasive SCC and additionally 5 normal skin tissues from immunocompetent patients were analyzed. Thus, total RNA of 15 specimens were used for hybridization with Affymetrix HG-U133A microarray technology containing 22,283 genes. Data analyses were performed by prediction analysis of microarrays using nearest shrunken centroids with the threshold 3.5 and ANOVA analysis was independently performed in order to identify differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05). Verification of 13 up- or down-regulated genes was performed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and genes were additionally confirmed by sequencing. Broad coherent patterns in normal skin vs. AK and SCC were observed for 118 genes.
CONCLUSION: The majority of identified differentially expressed genes in cutaneous SCC were previously not described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893473      PMCID: PMC1569867          DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer        ISSN: 1476-4598            Impact factor:   27.401


Background

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), encompassing both basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), is the most common cancer in Caucasians, and over the last decade incidence has been increased dramatically worldwide [1]. Actinic keratosis (AK) is an early stage of SCC and approximately 10% of cases progress to SCC [2-4]. Ultraviolet radiation (UV) is the major risk factor for this disease [5,6]. Carcinogenesis is a multi-step process indicated by a series of genes that are up- or down-regulated during tumor progression. In normal vs. cancerous colon tissue only 1–1.5% of approximately 30,000 – 50,000 functional genes per cell were differentially expressed resulting in 548 genes [7]. A comparable quantity was identified in breast cancer cells exhibiting 700 dysregulated genes [8]. Thus, the number of differentially expressed genes seem to be similar in different cancers. Many genes showing increased expression elevated in colon-cancer represent proteins that are considered to be involved in growth and proliferation while there were often attributed to differentiation in normal tissue. Analyzing skin- or head and neck-cell lines, genes that are associated with extracellular matrix production and apoptosis were disrupted in preneoplastic cells during SCC development, whereas genes that are involved in DNA repair or epidermal growth factors were altered at later stages [9]. Transformation of keratinocytes in response to UV-radiation was examined by microarray technology using normal human epidermal keratinocytes and SCC cell lines [10]. This study detected four clusters of differentially expressed genes in normal keratinocytes vs. skin cancer cells, which may play a role in the carcinogenic pathway. However, cell lines are often different from human tissues that has been demonstrated for both colon cancer [11] and ovarian cancer [12,13]. Thus, human cancer tissues are superior compared with cell lines analyzing differentially expressed genes. So far, only one study examined differentially expressed genes in NMSC tissue using nylon-filter DNA microarrays analyzing approximately 7,400 genes [14]. In the present study, we evaluated the different expression profile of 22,283 genes in normal skin biopsies vs. AK vs. cutaneous SCC. We focused on dysregulated genes best characterizing normal skin and NMSC (comprising both AK and SCC). Overall, 42 genes were up-regulated and 76 genes were down-regulated in skin cancer and the majority of differentially expressed genes were not described earlier.

Results

Relative expression in normal skin and NMSC

Of the 22,283 transcripts and expressed sequence tags (EST) investigated on each oligonucleotide microarray, 118 genes were detected differentially expressed in normal skin, AK, and SCC by Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) analysis excluding 81 genes (EST and genes with the description "consensus includes...") (see Methods). For each of the 6 normal skins, 4 AK, and 5 SCC (Table 1), the relative expression of each gene was examined. We have controlled the RNA quality of each human specimen analyzing the fragment sizes, and the ratio of 5'- and 3'-ends using microarray test-chips with 24 human control genes of 6 randomly selected specimens and only non-degraded mRNA specimens were used in this study.
Table 1

Data of organ transplant (TX) non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) patients or non-TX.

PatientSex/age (years)TXTime after TX (years)Normal skinAKSCC
1 (BN)F/60Kidney23Insight lower arm (ILAa)Finger (1)bHand (1)
2 (GM)M/66Kidney11ILAaLower leg (2)Forehead (2)
3 (MP)M/58Liver12ILAaLower LegcLower Leg (3)
4 (DR)M/73Heart9ILAaHead (3)Forehead (4)
5 (JG)M/69Kidney2ILAa (1)Earc(4)Forehead (5)
6 (GH)M/57Non-TXHead (2)NCNC
7 (WM)F/61Non-TXCheek (3)NCNC
8 (WM)F/61Non-TXHead (4)NCNC
9 (EW)F/74Non-TXFace (5)NCNC
10 (MG)M/17Non-TXFundament (6)NCNC

Normal skin, AK, and SCC biopsies were collected from each TX-patient, and in addition normal skin biopsies were obtained from age-matched immunocompetent patients (non-TX).

a RNA of 5 normal biopsies were pooled.

b The biopsies used for microarray analysis are indicated with numbers in parentheses marked in bold.

c RNA of 2 AK were pooled.

F, female; M, male; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; NC, not collected.

Data of organ transplant (TX) non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) patients or non-TX. Normal skin, AK, and SCC biopsies were collected from each TX-patient, and in addition normal skin biopsies were obtained from age-matched immunocompetent patients (non-TX). a RNA of 5 normal biopsies were pooled. b The biopsies used for microarray analysis are indicated with numbers in parentheses marked in bold. c RNA of 2 AK were pooled. F, female; M, male; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; NC, not collected. PAM analysis was used to identify genes to classify and to best characterize normal skin, AK or SCC. The rate of misclassification on the basis of individual cross validation plots was 0% (0.0) for normal skin, 25% (0.25) for AK, 20% (0.20) for SCC, and 13% (0.13) for all three classes. The first gene list contained 200 genes best characterizing normal skin (6), AK (4), and SCC (5). Under the exclusion of EST and genes with the description "consensus includes..." (n = 81) we identified 118 dysregulated genes (Table 2).
Table 2

Genes identified by Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) differentially expressed in normal skin compared to non-melanoma skin cancer.

A) Up-regulated genes (42) in non-melanoma skin cancer.Microarray experimentsANOVA


No.Accession No.SymbolGeneFunctionLocalizationChange fold T/NMean of raw signal (normal)Mean of raw signal (AK&SCC)p-value
Differentiation
1AF183421.1rab22bSmall GTP-bindung protein rab22 (RAB31)Small GTPase signal transduction.18p11.31.87685312495n.s.
2NM_006868.1RAB31*RAB31, member RAS oncogene familySmall GTPase signal transduction.18p11.33.30263784370.027
Apoptosis
3NM_004834.1MAP4K4*Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 4A member of the serine/threonine protein kinase family, specifically activate MAPK8/JNK.2q11.2-q122.65147538980.024
Proliferation
4NM_007375.1TARDBPTAR DNA binding proteinTranscriptional repressor that binds to chromosomally integrated TAR DNA and represses HIV-1 transcription.1p36.221.48677910441n.s.
Metabolism
5D55674.1hnRNP DHeterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein DAssociated with pre-mRNAs in the nucleus and appear to influence pre-mRNA processing and other aspects of mRNA metabolism and transport.4q21.1-q21.21.6440206968n.s.
6NM_003942.1RPS6KA4Ribosomal protein S6 kinaseRSK (ribosomal S6 kinase) family of serine/threonine kinases11q11-q131.74337460290.044
7NM_001814.1CTSCCathepsin C (CTSC)Defects in the encoded protein have been shown to be a cause of Papillon-Lefevre syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by palmoplantar keratosis and periodontitis.11q14.1-q14.31.641143518686n.s.
8Z14077.1YY1YY1, NF-E1 proteinTranscription factor involved in repressing and activating a diverse number of promoters.14q2.0841858939n.s.
9NM_006141.1DNCLI2Dynein, cytoplasmic, light intermediate polypeptide 2Involved in retrograde organelle transport and some aspects of mitosis.16q22.13.2322255692n.s.
10AF061832.1M4M4 protein deletion mutantAppear to influence pre-mRNA processing and other aspects of mRNA metabolism and transport.19p13.3-p13.21.291115414824n.s.
Cell communication
11U65590IL-1RN*IL-1 receptor antagonist IL-1RaInhibits the activities of interleukin 1, alpha (IL1A) and interleukin 1, beta (IL1B), and modulates a variety of interleukin 1 related immune and inflammatory responses.2q14.21.75959918079n.s.
12NM_004688.1NMI*N-myc (and STAT) interactorInteracts with NMYC, CMYC, all STATs except STAT2.2p24.3-q21.32.3327446248n.s.
13NM_002416.1MIGMonokine induced by gamma interferonBinding to CXCR3 causes pleiotropic effects, including stimulation of monocytes, natural killer and T-cell migration, and modulation of adhesion molecule expression.4q213.54149210529n.s.
14U72069.1TNPO1Karyopherin beta2Interacts with nuclear localization signals to target nuclear proteins to the nucleus.5q13.22.0629866049n.s.
15BC004489.1HLA-CMajor histocompatibility complex, class I, CA central role in the immune system by presenting peptides derived from ER lumen.6p21.31.3078196106054n.s.
16L42024.1HLA-B39MHC, HLA-B39A central role in the immune system by presenting peptides derived from ER lumen.6p21.31.3578040114101n.s.
17NM_005516.1HLA-EMajor histocompatibility complex, class I, EA central role in the immune system by presenting peptides derived from ER lumen.6p21.31.762425243847n.s.
18NM_006096.1NDRG1N-myc downstream regulated gene 1Involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation.8q24.32.6017233449140.024
19AF313468.1lectin-1Dendritic cell-associated C-type lectin-1Diverse functions, such as cell adhesion, cell-cell signalling, glycoprotein turnover, and roles in inflammation and immune response.12p12.3-p13.23.61116341460.019
20U88964HEM45HEM45HIV-1 Tat upregulates the interferon-responsive gene expression of HEM45.15q263.2498232930.019
21NM_000418.1IL4R*Interleukin 4 receptorDevelopment of allergic reactions and have been shown to modulate the function of monocytes and macrophages.16p11.2-12.12.41251961590.014
22NM_015986.1CREME9Cytokine receptor-like molecule 9Thought to be involved in signal transduction.17q11.21.58433569500.015
23NM_002087.1GRN*GranulinA role in the development of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.17q21.321.7714453259780.034
Adhesion
24AK023406.1FLJ13344FLJ13344 fisHigh homology to the actin and microtubules binding protein ABP620.1p32-p312.49365691070.038
25U03271CAPZBF-actin capping protein beta subunitRegulates growth of the actin filament by capping the barbed end of growing actin filaments.1p36.11.351180916060n.s.
26NM_005572.1LMNALamin ACLamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression.1q21.2-q21.31.471353119844n.s.
27AB010427.2WDR1NORI-1May help induce the disassembly of actin filaments.4p16.12.11741815927<0.001
28NM_004893.1H2AFYH2A histone family, member YA member of the histone H2A family.5q31.3-q321.3918975267580.048
29NM_001101.2ACTBActin, betaConserved proteins that are involved in cell motility, structure and integrity.7p15-p121.441208641783420.026
30NM_000700.1ANXA1Annexin A1Located on the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane.9q12-q21.21.7435910640230.043
31NM_002160.1TNC*Hexabrachion (tenascin C, cytotactin) (HXB),Spliced tenascin-C has important roles in tumor progression of breast cancer.9q334.60181986940.038
32BF3389471–8UInterferon induced transmembrane protein 3Transmembrane protein.11p15.51.702058833223n.s.
33NM_002421.2MMP1*Matrix metalloproteinase 1Involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix in normal physiological processes (embryonic development, reproduction, and tissue remodeling), in disease processes (arthritis, metastasis).11q22.3> 10293180060.024
34J00269.1KRT6AHuman 56 k cytoskeletal type II keratinMember of the keratin gene family.12q12-q133.79426041611540.026
35NM_006825.1CKAP4Transmembrane proteinRequired for cell adhesion.12q24.111.6812780221540.023
36NM_005561.2LAMP1Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1Possible a role in tumor cell metastasis.13q341.282549533858n.s.
37NM_001793.1CDH3Cadherin 3, type 1, P-cadherin (placental)Calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoprotein, mutations in this gene have been associated with congential hypotrichosis with juvenile macular dystrophy.16q22.13.633819159340.043
38NM_004360.1CDH1*Cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin (epithelial)Calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoprotein, mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer.16q22.11.311877324888n.s.
39BC001920.1actin gammaActin, gamma 1Involved in various types of cell motility, and maintenance of the cytoskeleton.17q251.38108509152446n.s.
40NM_001614.2ACTG1Actin, gamma 1Involved in various types of cell motility, and maintenance of the cytoskeleton.17q251.43113681166361n.s.
41NM_004368.1CNN2Calponin 2Participates in smooth muscle contractio, cell adhesion and can bind actin.21q11.11.4340125822n.s.
42NM_004994.1MMP9Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (gelatinase B, collagenase)Involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix in normal physiological processes (embryonic development, reproduction, tissue remodeling), in disease processes (arthritis and metastasis).20q11.2-q13.14.70315016961n.s.
B) Down-regulated genes (76) in non-melanoma skin cancer.Microarray experimentsANOVA


No.Accession No.SymbolGeneFunctionLocalizationChange fold N/TMean of raw signal (normal)Mean of raw signal (AK&SCC)p-value

Differentiation
1NM_004430.1EGR3Early growth response 3Participates in the transcriptional regulation of genes in controling biological rhythm.8p23-p212.2278333782n.s.
2NM_022969.1FGFR2Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2Influences mitogenesis and differentiation.10q262.0499675011n.s.
3BC001971.1p27, Kip1Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1BBinds to and prevents the activation of cyclin E-CDK2 or cyclin D-CDK4 complexes, and thus controls the cell cycle progression at G1.12p13.1-p121.4582345959n.s.
4AF309553.1REC14Meiotic recombination protein REC14Exact function unknown. Thought to be involved in differentiation.15q24.11.961614883950.027
5NM_001424.1EMP2Epithelial membrane protein 2A role in the control of cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and cell death.16p13.22.0021074110070.026
6NM_001983.1ERCC1*Excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiencyRepair protein expression is reduced in testis neoplasms.19q13.2-q13.31.7972224073n.s.
Apoptosis
7NM_016085.1APR-3n.s.Apoptosis related protein APR-3Involved in apoptosis, and may also be involved in hematopoietic development and differentiation.2p23.31.8521640118630.012
8AB055804.1MM-1 betaMM-1 betaAssists in the correct folding of other proteins, subunit is thought to repress the transcriptional activity of c-myc.12q121.643568222035n.s.
9NM_015965.1CGI-39*CGI-39 protein; cell death-regulatory protein GRIM19Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.19p13.21.43128889485n.s.
Proliferation
10BC003689.1HMG 17High-mobility group (non-histone chromosomal protein 17)Nucleosomal binding protein.1p36.11.224622938384n.s.
11NM_006694.1JTBJumping translocation breakpointUp-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1q211.3926313192830.030
12NM_001967.2EIF4A2Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4AProtein translation.3q281.9241342223410.019
13NM_005935.1MLLT2Myeloidlymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemiaInteraction with SIAH1 and SIAH2 proteins, the cell cycle control exerted by MLL-AF4 may be responsible of resistance to cell-death.4q211.82141468083n.s.
14AF279903.1EC4560S ribosomal protein L15A ribosomal protein that is a component of the 60S subunit.3p24.11.856078336597n.s.
15NM_002948.1RPL15Ribosomal protein L15A ribosomal protein that is a component of the 60S subunit, overexpressed in some esophageal tumors compared to normal matched tissues.3p24.11.797910946326n.s.
16NM_001023.1RPS20Ribosomal protein S20A ribosomal protein that is a component of the 40S subunit.8q121.357812658507n.s.
17NM_000995.1RPL34Ribosomal protein L34Component of the 60S subunit.4q251.859235652954n.s.
18NM_006098.1GNB2L1Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)Regulates G1/S progression by suppressing Src kinase activity.5q35.31.327371357754n.s.
19NM_007104.2RPL10ARibosomal protein L10aDownregulated in the thymus by cyclosporin-A (CsA), an immunosuppressive drug.6p21.3-p21.21.497717854218n.s.
20BC000734.1EIF3S6Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3Protein translation.8q22-q231.385170537233n.s.
21NM_003756.1EIF3S3Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3Protein translation, overexpression of EIF3S3 is associated with breast and prostate cancer.8q24.111.493872525795n.s.
22BC000524.1RPS6Ribosomal protein S6Protein synthesis, cytoplasmic ribosomal protein that is a component of the 40S subunit.9p211.239949983221n.s.
23NM_001417.1EIF4BEukaryotic translation initiation factor 4BStimulate the nuclease activity of herpes simplex virus.12q13.131.351518411509n.s.
24NM_000968.1RPL4Ribosomal protein L4Component of the 60S subunit.15q221.3011818092600n.s.
25NM_015920.1LOC5106540S ribosomal protein S27Similarity with ribosomal protein S27.15q22.11.6724852155170.043
26NM_001009.1RPS5Ribosomal protein S5Variable expression of this gene in colorectal cancers compared to adjacent normal tissues, although no correlation between the severity of this disease has been observed.19q13.41.5457497381100.033
27NM_016091.1HSPC025HSPC025Interacts with Int-6 and is associated with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3.22q1.4558905415620.043
28L22453.1TARBP-bHIV-1 TAR RNA binding protein (RPL3)Encodes a ribosomal protein that is a component of the 60S subunit; the protein can bind to the HIV-1 TAR mRNA, and the protein probably contributes to tat-mediated transactivation.22q131.478686559742n.s.
29NM_006013.1RPL10Ribosomal protein L10This gene encodes a ribosomal protein that is a component of the 60S subunit.Xq281.27127604102770n.s.
30NM_014315.1LCPhost cell factor homologTranscriptional coactivator which coordinates the assembly of enhancer complex through direct interactions with viral and cellular trans-activators.14q21.3-q22.11.921258867560.003
Metabolism
31NM_015958.1LOC51611CGI-30 proteinActivities of Dipthine synthase, methyltransferase, and transferase.1p21.21.6777394726n.s.
32NM_000847GSTA3Glutathione S-transferase A3Involved in cellular defense against toxic, carcinogenic, and pharmacologically active electrophilic compounds.6p12.15.0015571350.005
33NM_002633.1PGM1Phosphoglucomutase 1Regulatory enzyme in cellular glucose utilization and energy homeostasis.1p312.2222301101700.044
34BC006229.1CYC5bCytochrome c oxidase subunit VbTerminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.2cen-q132.001778091050.015
35NM_001862.1COX5BCytochrome c oxidase subunit VbTerminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.2cen-q131.8526820147370.035
36NM_002492.1NDUFB5NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplexA subunit of the multisubunit NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I).3q27.11.671889811821n.s.
37NM_021122.2FACL2Fatty-acid-Coenzyme A ligasePlays a role in lipid biosynthesis and fatty acid degradation.4q34-q352.503914215864n.s.
38BC005270.1ND4FS4NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 4Multisubunit enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a vital role in cellular ATP production.5q11.11.85109205956n.s.
39NM_001867.1COX7CCytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIcMitochondrial respiratory chain, catalyzes the electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c to oxygen.5q142.1755286262010.013
40BC003674.1NDUFA2NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplexMultisubunit enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a vital role in cellular ATP production.5q311.6795625854n.s.
41NM_014402.1QP-CLow molecular mass ubiquinone-binding proteinActivities of oxidoreductase, and ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase.5q31.11.693221019064n.s.
42BC001917.1MDH2Malate dehydrogenase 2, NAD (mitochondrial)Oxidation of malate to oxaloacetate (citric acid cycle).7p12.3-q11.21.302449019165n.s.
43NM_002489.1NDUFA4NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplexMultisubunit enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a vital role in cellular ATP production.7p21.31.592203814006n.s.
44NM_005004.1NDUFB8NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplexMultisubunit enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.10q23.2-q23.331.412537518105n.s.
45NM_004074.1COX8Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIITerminal enzyme of the respiratory chain.11q12-q131.372136015941n.s.
46NM_004549.1NDUFC2NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1Multisubunit enzyme complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.11q13.41.593392121642n.s.
47AF042165COX7CP1Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIcTerminal component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.13q14-q212.0840375199400.003
48NM_001861.1COX4Cytochrome c oxidase subunit IVMitochondrial respiratory chain.16q22-qter1.255419644561n.s.
49L47162.1FALDHHuman fatty aldehyde dehydrogenaseDetoxification of aldehydes generated by alcohol metabolism and lipid peroxidation.17p11.22.501642068980.038
50NM_000382.1ALDH3A2Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 familyDetoxification of aldehydes generated by alcohol metabolism and lipid peroxidation.17p11.23.331951358670.020
51NM_021074.1NDUFV2NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) flavoprotein 2Activities of NADH dehydrogenase, electron carrier, and oxidoreductase.18p11.31-p11.21.822084711262n.s.
52M22865.1CYb5Human cytochrome b5Cytochrome c oxidase activity.18q233.573617511654n.s.
53M22976.1cyt b5Human cytochrome b5, 3 endCytochrome c oxidase activity.18q233.70222886090n.s.
54NM_001914.1CYB5Cytochrome b-5Cytochrome c oxidase activity.18q233.333169410220n.s.
55NM_013387.1HSPC051Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complexActivities of oxidoreductase, and ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase.22cen-q12.31.431559211200n.s.
56NM_001866.1COX7BCytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIbEncoded by COX, the terminal component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, catalyzes the electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c to oxygen.Xq13.31.372986021796n.s.
57NM_004541.2NDUFA1NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplexCodes for an essential component of complex I of the respiratory chain, which transfers electrons from NADH to ubiquinone.Xq242.2725486114130.026
Cell communication
58BC002669.1NR2Nuclear receptor subfamily 2Predicted to encode proteins that are very similar in primary structure to receptors for steroid hormones or thyroid hormone (T3).19p13.11.5172134917n.s.
59NM_004182.1UXTUbiquitously-expressed transcriptInteracts with the N-terminus of the androgen receptor and plays a role in facilitating receptor-induced transcriptional activation.Xp11.23-p11.221.59116097489n.s.
60M92439.1LeuPHuman leucine-rich proteinActivate expression of MDR1 and MVP (key components of the cytotoxic defense network).2p211.9264293379n.s.
Adhesion
61NM_006893.1LGTNLigatinA role in neuroplasticity by modulating cell-cell interactions, intracellular adhesion, and protein binding at membrane surfaces.1q31-q321.7094445566n.s.
62M80927.1CHI3L1**Human glycoprotein -39Extracellular matrix structural constituent, sugar binding, and hydrolase activity.1q32.17.69312655550n.s.
63NM_015717.1LANGERINLangerhans cell specific c-type lectinExpressed only in Langerhans cells which are immature dendritic cells of the epidermis and mucosa.2p134.00458613230.023
64NM_007234.2DCTN3Dynactin 3 (p22)Involved in a diverse array of cellular functions, including ER-to-Golgi transport, the centripetal movement of lysosomes and endosomes, spindle formation, cytokinesis, chromosome movement, nuclear positioning, and axonogenesis.9p131.45136909694n.s.
65NM_018663.1LOC55895Peroxisomal membrane proteinPeroxisome organization and biogenesis (assembly and arrangement of peroxisome).12q24.333.4569282170n.s.
Detoxification
66NM_001512.1GSTA4Glutathione S-transferase A4Involved in cellular defense against toxic, carcinogenic, and pharmacologically active electrophilic compounds.6p12.11.412583818009n.s.
67NM_004528.1MGST3Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 3Involved in the production of leukotrienes and prostaglandin E, important mediators of inflammation.1q231.9622933120070.023
68NM_002413.1MGST2Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 2Catalyzes the conjugation of leukotriene A4 and reduced glutathione to produce leukotriene C4.4q28.31.82108886065n.s.
69NM_015917.1LOC51064Glutathione S-transferase subunit 13 homologActivities of glutathione transferase, protein disulfide oxidoreductase, and transferase.71.7594225458n.s.
70NM_001752.1CATCatalaseAbnormal expression of catalase in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium strongly suggests pathologic involvement of free radicals in endometriosis and adenomyosis.11p131.612766917923n.s.
71L19185NKEFBn.s.Human natural killer cell enhancing factorReduce hydrogen peroxide and alkyl hydroperoxides.19p13.22.503972317286n.s.
unknown
72NM_016098.1LOC51660HSPC040 proteinUnknown Function.6q273.331548146820.038
73AL356115KIAA1128KIAA1128 proteinUnknown Function.10q23.21.38126962934880.048
74AK022248FLJ12186FLJ12186Unknown Function.14q22.31.381526111116n.s.
75NM_004868.1GPSN2Glycoprotein, synaptic 2Unknown Function.19p13.121.691983011888n.s.
76AF151056.1HSPC222HSPC222Unknown Function.unknown1.5940513265660.030

The accession number, the symbol, the description of the genes, their function, their chromosome localization, the change fold, the raw signal (mean value), and the p values of the ANOVA analysis are shown. The accession numbers in bold represent the 42 genes identified by PAM and ANOVA (p < 0.05), which were significantly differentially expressed. The symbols marked in bold represent the genes verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

A) Up-regulated genes (42) in non-melanoma skin cancer.

B) Down-regulated genes (76) in non – melanoma skin cancer.

* significant expression difference verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

** positive with two different affymetrix numbers (209395_at and 209396_s_at).

No., numbers; T, Tumor (AK and SCC), N, normal skin; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; n.s., not significant.

Genes identified by Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) differentially expressed in normal skin compared to non-melanoma skin cancer. The accession number, the symbol, the description of the genes, their function, their chromosome localization, the change fold, the raw signal (mean value), and the p values of the ANOVA analysis are shown. The accession numbers in bold represent the 42 genes identified by PAM and ANOVA (p < 0.05), which were significantly differentially expressed. The symbols marked in bold represent the genes verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. A) Up-regulated genes (42) in non-melanoma skin cancer. B) Down-regulated genes (76) in non – melanoma skin cancer. * significant expression difference verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. ** positive with two different affymetrix numbers (209395_at and 209396_s_at). No., numbers; T, Tumor (AK and SCC), N, normal skin; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; n.s., not significant. Hierarchical clustering was performed with the identified 118 genes based on similarities of expression levels independently of the assigned class (normal skin, AK or SCC). Gene trees display gene similarities as a dendrogram, a tree-like structure made up of branches. This nested structure forces all genes to be related to a certain level, with larger branches representing the more distantly related genes (Figure 1). The gene CHI3L1 was detected with two different affymetrix numbers and are included twice in the cluster map (Figure 1). The "Condition Tree" groups samples together based on similar expression profiles by standard correlation with the GeneSpring software 6.1 resulting in two classes. The specimens with the pooled RNA (normal and AK) grouped together with the non-pooled RNA in class 1 (normal skin) and class 2 (AK and SCC) (Figure 1). In class 1, all 6 normal skin specimens grouped together, and class 2 consisted of 4 AK and 5 SCC. Thus, statistical differences in the expression levels of such genes were not detected in carcinoma in situ (AK) vs. invasive cancer (SCC). Furthermore, the pooled normal skin specimens from 5 immunosuppressed patients grouped together with 5 non-pooled normal skin specimens from immunocompetent patients (Figure 1). Thus, the expression levels of the selected genes were independent of systemic immunosuppression.
Figure 1

Cluster map analysis of 118 genes identified by PAM of 15 different specimens resulting in two classes (9 neoplastic skin lesions and 6 normal skin). Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) using nearest shrunken centroids was performed with 22,283 genes, which were present on the microarray platform (Affymetrix) to identify genes best characterizing normal skin, actinic keratosis (AK), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Hierarchical clustering was performed with 118 genes identified by PAM (CHI3L1 was detected with two independent Affymetrix probes and are included twice, marked with an asterisk). Thirteen genes verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR are marked in bold. Each color patch represents the normalized expression level of one gene in each group, with a continuum of expression levels from dark blue (lowest) to dark red (highest). The minimal set of informative genes is given by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) symbols. Group (1–9) are non-melanoma skin cancer AK (1, 5, 6, and 8), and SCC (2–4, 7, and 9) showing different expression levels compared with six cases of normal skin (10–15). Numbers 6 and 10 were specimens with pooled RNAs.

Cluster map analysis of 118 genes identified by PAM of 15 different specimens resulting in two classes (9 neoplastic skin lesions and 6 normal skin). Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) using nearest shrunken centroids was performed with 22,283 genes, which were present on the microarray platform (Affymetrix) to identify genes best characterizing normal skin, actinic keratosis (AK), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Hierarchical clustering was performed with 118 genes identified by PAM (CHI3L1 was detected with two independent Affymetrix probes and are included twice, marked with an asterisk). Thirteen genes verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR are marked in bold. Each color patch represents the normalized expression level of one gene in each group, with a continuum of expression levels from dark blue (lowest) to dark red (highest). The minimal set of informative genes is given by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) symbols. Group (1–9) are non-melanoma skin cancer AK (1, 5, 6, and 8), and SCC (2–4, 7, and 9) showing different expression levels compared with six cases of normal skin (10–15). Numbers 6 and 10 were specimens with pooled RNAs. ANOVA analysis identified 364 genes including 7 EST, which were significantly differentially expressed between normal skin, AK, and cutaneous SCC (p < 0.05). Using p < 0.15 the gene list contained 2,197 genes including 42 EST. The overall agreement rate of the identified genes by ANOVA using p < 0.05 or p < 0.15 and PAM was 36% (42 of 118) or 78% (92 of 118), respectively. To identify potentially dysregulated genes between AK and SCC, we have performed ANOVA analysis in these two groups (p < 0.05), and no gene was significantly differentially expressed in AK compared with SCC. For further analysis we have used the 118 genes that have been identified by PAM and the 42 significantly differentially expressed genes identified by both methods are highlighted in Table 2. A higher expression level in skin tumors vs. normal skin was observed for 42 genes. Of these genes 19 (45%) were involved in adhesion, 13 (31%) in cell communication, 6 (14%) in metabolism, two in differentiation (5%), and one each in apoptosis (2%) and in proliferation (2%). In contrast, a lower expression rate was observed for 76 genes and 27 (36%) were involved in metabolism, 21 (28%) in proliferation, 6 (8%) each in differentiation, and detoxification, 5 (7%) in adhesion, 3 (4%) each in apoptosis, and cell communication, and 5 (7%) were of unknown functions.

Verification of selected genes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR

To verify the different expression levels of mRNA measured by microarray technology, we selected 13 up- or down-regulated genes with low through high change folds from the list of differentially expressed genes. These included 9 genes with a higher (change folds by microarray analysis 1.31 – >10) and 4 with a lower expression level (change folds by microarray analysis 1.43 – 2.50) in neoplastic skin lesions vs. normal skin (Table 2). Gene specific intron-flanking primers were designed for 9 up-regulated genes (RAB31, MAP4K4, IL-1RN, NMI, IL-4R, GRN, TNC, MMP1, and CDH1) and 4 down-regulated genes (ERCC1, APR-3, CGI-39, and NKEFB) (Table 3). Unspecific PCR products were not obtained for all genes shown by electrophoresis of the PCR amplicons in agarose gels. Gene-specificity of all 13 genes was confirmed by sequencing of the PCR product of each gene. The results of the real-time RT-PCR were consistent with the microarray data (Figure 2). All genes showed the predicted expression level either higher or lower in normal skin vs. skin cancer. The real-time RT-PCR data confirmed significant expression differences in 11 of 13 genes (85%) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). APR-3 and NKEFB showed the predicted lower expression level in skin tumors vs. normal skin (median values 0.85 vs. 1.12, p = 0.14, median values 1.0 vs. 2.16, p = 0.11). Furthermore, we reanalyzed 3 of 13 genes with an increased number of specimens of immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with normal skin (n ≥ 21), AK (n = 11), and SCC (n = 15). The change folds by microarray analysis of the three up-regulated genes MMP1, TNC, and RAB31 were >10, 4.6, and 3.3, respectively. The median expression rate by real-time RT-PCR in normal skin (N) vs. AK vs. SCC of MMP1 was 0.1 vs. 0.5 vs. 2.9 (N vs. SCC, p ≤ 0.001), of TNC 0.7 vs. 2.1 vs. 14.0 (N vs. SCC, p ≤ 0.001), and of RAB31 0.9 vs. 1.7 vs. 6.3 ((N vs. SCC, p ≤ 0.001), respectively.
Table 3

Forward and reverse primer sequences for quantitative real-time RT-PCR to verify differentially expressed genes.

GeneForward (5'-3')Reverse (5'-3')
APR-3GGT TCT GAT TTC GTC CCT GACAG CAT TAG CTC TCG TGT CG
CDH1TGA AGG TGA CAG AGC CTC TGG ATTGG GTG AAT TCG GGC TTG TT
CGI-39CGT CAA AGG TGA AGC AGG ACATT ATG CTC CAG TGC CCG TA
ERCC1GGG AAT TTG GCG ACG TAA TTCGCG GAG GCT GAG GAA CAG
GRNCAG TGG GAA GTA TGG CTG CTTTA GTG AGG AGG TCC GTG GT

IL-1RNGGA AGA TGT GCC TGT CCT GTCGC TTG TCC TGC TTT CTG TT
IL4RCAC CTG CCT CTG TCT CAC TGA AGGC CGC CCA AGT CAT TC
MAP4K4CTG GTC ACT TGG ATG GTG TGAGA CCG AAC AGA GGC AAA GA
MMP1CTT GCA CTG AGA AAG AAG ACA AAG GACA CCC CAG AAC AGC AGC A
NKEFBACC CAG GAA AGG GCA GACTTC TAG GTG GAG GCA TTG AGA

NMIGAC ACA CTG CGT GAA GAT CAATCC AAT CTC CAC AAA CGT GA
RAB31TGA CCA CAA CAT CAG CCC TAAAT GAA ACC GTT CCT GAC CA
TNCACT GTG GAC GGA ACC AAG ACTGT GGT GAA TGA CCC TGA GA
RPS9ATC CGC CAG CGC CAT ATCA ATG TGC TTC TGG GAA TCC
Figure 2

Verification of 13 genes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Expression levels were based on the amount of the target RNA relatively to the endogenous control gene RPS9 in order to normalize the amount and quality of total RNA. Relative expression levels of a) 9 up-regulated genes, b) 4 down-regulated genes, and c) 3 up-regulated genes in epithelial skin cancer vs. normal skin. c) Three genes were re-analyzed with an increased number of different specimens of immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients (see Methods section 'Patients'). Statistical analysis was performed with the U-Test by Wilcoxon, Mann, and Whitney. N, normal skin; T, AK and cutaneous SCC; n.s., not significant; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Forward and reverse primer sequences for quantitative real-time RT-PCR to verify differentially expressed genes. Verification of 13 genes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Expression levels were based on the amount of the target RNA relatively to the endogenous control gene RPS9 in order to normalize the amount and quality of total RNA. Relative expression levels of a) 9 up-regulated genes, b) 4 down-regulated genes, and c) 3 up-regulated genes in epithelial skin cancer vs. normal skin. c) Three genes were re-analyzed with an increased number of different specimens of immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients (see Methods section 'Patients'). Statistical analysis was performed with the U-Test by Wilcoxon, Mann, and Whitney. N, normal skin; T, AK and cutaneous SCC; n.s., not significant; AK, actinic keratosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Discussion

We have examined the expression levels of 22,283 genes in human biopsies of normal skin and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (AK, and SCC) by microarray technology. One hundred and eighteen genes were differentially expressed in normal skin vs. skin cancer and fulfilled the criteria used for PAM based cluster map analysis. Expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays is a useful tool to identify tumors, to distinguish different tumor entities, and to differentiate between progressing and non-progressing neoplastic lesions [7,15-18]. In this study, we used mRNA from skin biopsies without microdissection resulting in high RNA amounts and subsequently no amplification of the RNA transcripts were required. On the other hand, we cannot avoid a mixture of dysplastic and non-dysplastic cells in our specimens. A mixture of normal epithelial cells and tumor cells are most likely present in cancerous lesions (AK) but are unlikely in normal skin specimens. If the tumor specimen contained normal and dysplastic cells, an increased gene expression in cancer vs. normal skin or vice versa was not detected by microarray analysis. Thus, the number of differentially expressed genes detected in our study represent a subset of all differentially expressed genes in skin cancer and genes showing only low differences are most likely to be unidentified. The number of differentially expressed genes in normal tissue vs. colon cancer and breast cancer was 548 and 700, respectively [7,8]. In our study, we detected 118 genes excluding EST best characterizing normal skin and epithelial skin cancer. These genes represent approximately 20% of all genes expected to be differentially expressed in skin cancer. So far, only one study examined the expression profile in human biopsies of NMSC and skin cancer cell lines by microarray analyzing approximately 7,400 genes [14]. Although there was only a minimal overlap between human tissue and cell lines, five genes were differentially expressed both in vivo and in vitro, namely fibronectin 1, annexin A5, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, zink-finger protein 254, and huntingtin-associated protein interacting protein. Of these genes the calcium and phospholipid-binding protein annexin 5 was over-expressed (ratio 2.1) and annexin 1 showed a slightly over-expression in cutaneous SCC. In our study using another approach annexin 1 was over-expressed in AK and cutaneous SCC (change fold 1.74) showing that 1 of 5 genes (20%) differentially expressed in the study of Dooley and colleagues [14] could be confirmed. Lamin A and C showed a significant higher expression in AK and SCC compared with normal skin analyzed by immunohistochemistry [19], and these genes were also up-regulated in our study. Furthermore, enzymes of the mitochondrial chain namely cytochrome c oxidase, cytochrome b, and NADH dehydrogenase were the majority of down-regulated genes. In prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia, a high mutation rate of NADH subunits of the respiratory chain complex I was observed similar to lung and head and neck cancer [20]. Delsite and colleagues [21] examined breast cancer cell lines and suggested that a lack of mitochondrial genes leads to increased oxidative stress, reduced DNA repair, and genetic instability. Furthermore, mitochondrial dysfunction leads to an increased production of reactive oxygene species (ROS), inhibition of apoptosis, activation of oncogenes, and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, and thus is involved during carcinogenesis [22,23]. In our study, the majority of these enzymes was down-regulated in NMSC, indicating that mitochondrial dysfunction is possible associated with cutaneous SCC. The reliability of the identified 118 genes by microarray technology was verified and confirmed by real-time RT-PCR analyzing 13 genes, and the following discussion is based on these genes.

9 genes up-regulated in NMSC (CDH1, MAP4K4, IL-1RN, IL-4R, NMI, GRN, RAB31, TNC, and MMP1)

CDH1 (E-Cadherin) is a representative of the classic cadherin family and a calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoprotein, mutations are correlated with a variety of cancers and loss of function may lead to cancer progression and metastasis [24]. In our study we observed an over-expression of CDH1 in skin cancer vs. normal skin, although a lower expression rate was expected. This may be due to a wrongly identified gene, a loss of function due to mutations, a post-transcriptional regulation of this gene or another mechanism in skin cancer vs. other cancers. MAP4K4 is a representative of the serine/threonine protein kinase family activating MAPK8/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [25]. JNK signal transduction pathway participates in the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of osteoblasts and is functionally operative in the malignant transformation of osteoblasts and the subsequent development and progression of human osteosarcomas [26]. IL-1RN (interleukin 1 receptor antagonist), IL-4R (interleukin 4 receptor), NMI (N-Myc and Stat interactor), and GRN (granulin) are genes involved in cell communications. IL-1RN is a representative of the interleukin 1 cytokine family inhibiting the activities of IL-1A and IL-1B, and modulates a variety of interleukin 1 related immune and inflammatory responses [27]. The homozygous genotype IL-1RN*2/2 of the IL-RN gene was strongly associated with early-stage gastric cancer [28]. IL-4R develop allergic reactions, modulate the function of monocytes and macrophages and has been shown over-expressed in a variety of human cancer cells in vitro and in vivo like melanoma, breast, ovarian, renal, and head and neck [29]. NMI interacts with the oncogenes C-myc and N-myc and other transcription factors containing a ZIP, HLH, or HLH-Zip motif first isolated and characterized by Bao and Zervos [30]. In addition, NMI interacts with all Stats except of Stat2 and augments Stat-mediated transcription in response to cytokines IL-2 and IFN-gamma [31]. A novel pathogenic mechanism of the transcription factor complex NMI, BRCA1 and c-Myc is the activation of telomerase, which is a key enzyme in carcinogenesis [32]. The growth factor GRN stimulates progression and metastasis of breast cancer and is involved in a variety of cancers such as clear cell renal carcinoma, invasive ovarian carcinoma and glioblastoma [33]. In our study all 5 genes showing different functions in tumorigenesis were also over-expressed in skin cancer. Rab31 represent a family of monomeric GTP-binding proteins and belongs to the Ras family [34,35]. Ras is a proto-oncogene, which is evolutionary conserved and is involved in various cancers [36], but the precise role of Ras, especially Ha-ras in NMSC is unknown. TNC is an extracellular matrix protein with anti-adhesive effects, and involved in tissue interactions during fetal development and oncogenesis. TNC was associated with breast and lung cancer [37] and was over-expressed in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are involved in extracellular matrix degradation and cancer invasion [38,39]. Tsukifuji and colleagues [40] reported an over-expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-3 in skin cancer (16 Ak, 6 AK with SCC, and 15 SCC). We detected an increased expression rate of MMP-1 and MMP-9 in skin cancer and both genes showed the highest expression rate in AK/SCC indicated by the change-folds of MMP-1 (<10), and MMP-9 (4.70) by microarray analysis. All three genes are considered to be involved in a variety of cancers, they were over-expressed in our study and may play a role in the cancerogenesis of NMSC, and thus are interesting candidates for further studies.

4 genes down-regulated in NMSC (ERCC1, APR-3, CGI-39, and NKEFB)

ERCC1 has a high homology with the yeast excision repair protein RAD10 [41], is reduced in testis neoplasms [42] and ovarian cancer cell lines [43]. APR-3 is considered to be involved in apoptosis and was identified using subtractive hybridization strategy in order to clone apoptosis-related genes [44]. NKEFB encodes a representative of the peroxiredoxin (Prx) family of antioxidant enzymes and may play a role in cancer development [45]. Prx II was strongly expressed in mature endothelial cells of benign vascular tumors, whereas it was weakly or not expressed in immature endothelial cells in malignant tumors of Kaposi's sarcoma and angiosarcoma [46]. In our study these genes were also down-regulated in skin cancer, and thus were consistent with the expected expression level observed in other carcinoma.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified 42 genes up-regulated and 76 genes down-regulated in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (AK and SCC) vs. normal skin, which represent approximately 20% of the genes differentially expressed in skin cancer. The majority of genes which known functions in other cancers was consistent with our results of differentially expressed genes in NMSC. These 118 genes either individually or more likely together or a subset of these genes may prove useful for diagnostic approaches.

Methods

Patients

Biopsies were obtained from 5 organ-transplanted (TX) recipients (3 kidney, 1 heart, and 1 liver, 58–73 years, median age 66 years) each normal skin, AK, and SCC. The time since transplantation ranged from 2 through 23 years (median 11 years), and no rejection was observed. All patients had multiple NMSC, such as AK, SCC and/or basal cell carcinoma, and lesions were mainly located on sun-exposed areas. The specimens from TX recipients of 5 normal skin and 2 AK specimens were pooled due to the low RNA amount of the individual specimens that was not sufficient for further microarray analyses. Furthermore, we have included 5 normal skin specimens from age-matched non-immunosuppressed individuals (17–74 years, median age 61 years). Thus, we have analyzed 6 normal skin, 4 AK, and 5 SCC specimens by microarray technology (Table 1). All clinical specimens were collected under standardized conditions by the same clinician (TF). From each organ-transplanted patient, punch biopsies (diameter 4 mm) of normal tissue, AK, and SCC were collected. Half of the tissue was transferred to liquid nitrogen within 2 minutes of resection and stored at -70°C until RNA isolation was performed. The other half of each biopsy was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological evaluation. All clinical diagnoses, normal skin, AK, and SCC were confirmed by histology. The same 15 RNA specimens (or representative subsets) were used for quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR of 13 selected genes for verification (Figure 2). Furthermore, 3 of these 13 genes MMP1, RAB31, and TNC were additionally examined by real-time RT-PCR with different specimens. For this analysis we used specimens of 22 normal skin (50–79 years, median age 63 years, including one immunosuppressed patient), of 11 AK (55–83 years, median age 63 years, including 7 immunosuppressed patients), and of 15 SCC patients (46–84 years, median age 61 years, including 7 immunosuppressed patients). The RNA amount of one normal skin specimen was not sufficient for TNC analysis, reducing the number of samples from 22 to 21 in this analysis. The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the Charite, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (number Si. 248).

RNA isolation and microarray hybridization

Total RNA was isolated using a modified RNeasy Micro Kit protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The modification included the homogenization of the frozen tissue in 300 μl of buffer RLT (Qiagen) with 20 ng Glycogen (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using a rotar-stator homogenizer "Ultra Turrax T25" (Janke & Kunkel, Staufen, Germany). The homogenized tissue was digested with 10 μl Proteinase K (10 mg ml-1) (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 55°C for 15 min. Subsequently the sample was digested with DNase I (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Quantification of isolated RNA was performed using UV-spectroscopy and the quality was determined both by A260/A280 ratio and Agilent bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Five microgram total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with 5 pmol μl-1 T7-oligo(dT)24 primer and was performed at 43°C for 90 minutes with the "Superscript First-Strand Synthesis-System" for RT-PCR (Invitrogen). Second-strand synthesis was performed with complete cDNA. The cDNA solution was incubated at 16°C for 2 hours followed by an incubation step for 20 min with 6 U T4-DNA polymerase at 16°C and the reaction was stopped using 10 μl of 0.5 M EDTA. The double stranded cDNA was purified by phenol/chloroform, ethanol precipitated and the pellet was resuspended in 12 μl of DEPC water. Labeled cRNA was generated from the cDNA sample by an in vitro transcription reaction that was supplemented with biotin-11-CTP and biotin-16-UTP (Enzo Diagnostics, Farmingdale, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer. The cRNA was quantified by A260, and the quality was determined using the labchip bioanalyzer (Agilent). Only cRNA specimens with a high quality were selected for further analyses. Fragmented cRNA (15 μg) was used to prepare 300 μl hybridization cocktail (100 mM MES, 1 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 0.01% Tween-20) containing 0.1 mg ml-1 of herring sperm DNA, and 0.5 mg ml-1 acetylated bovine serum albumine. Control cRNA was used in order to compare hybridization efficiencies between arrays and to standardize the quantification of measured transcript levels and was included as component of the 'Eukaryotic Hybridization Control kit' (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cocktails were heated to 95°C for 5 minutes, equilibrated at 45°C for 5 minutes, and clarified by centrifugation. The cocktail was hybridized to HG U133A arrays (Affymetrix) at 45°C for 16 hours. The arrays were washed and stained with a streptavidin-conjugated fluor using the GeneChip fluidics station protocol EukGE-WS2 (Affymetrix) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Arrays were scanned with an argon-ion laser confocal scanner (Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara, CA) with detection at 570 nm. Data were extracted using Microarray Suite version 5.0 (Affymetrix) and linearly scaled to achieve an average intensity of 2,500 per gene. Text files were exported to determine the intensity of each interrogating oligonucleotide perfect match probe cells or mismatch probe cells. In addition, the ratios of 5'- and 3'-ends of mRNA were analyzed of six randomly selected specimens (two of each group) using microarray test-chips (Test3 Array) containing 24 human housekeeping/maintenance genes (Affymetrix) and RNA degradation was not observed.

Bioinformatic analysis

The Data Mining Tool 3.0 (Affymetrix) and GeneSpring software package 6.1 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA, USA) were used for different replicates and statistical analyses were performed in order to compare between cancer stages. For each hybridization, the intensities were normalized in three steps, (1) data transformation, (2) per chip, and (3) per gene. (1) All values below 300 were set to 300, (2) each chip was normalized to the 50th percentile of the measurements, and (3) the median of the intensities of each probe sets representing one gene of all 15 microarray experiments was taken. The normalized values were used for further analyses. All processings from raw data, normalized raw data and p-detection values of the microarray experiments to the final tables and figures and a description of the method are provided as supplemental material with the series number GSE2503 [47]. Thus, the entire process of analysis is completely transparent and the description of the methodology used is according to the MIAME standard (minimum information about a microarray experiment). We used PAM for classification of tumors and identifications of genes that were significantly different expressed between three groups. PAM is a statistical technique for class prediction from gene expression data using nearest shrunken centroids. The technique has advantages in accuracy, especially when more than two classes are considered to be examined [48,49] as it is required for this study. PAM ranks genes using a panelized t-statistic and uses soft-thresholding to identify a gene set for classification. Data analysis was performed with 22,283 genes of all 15 specimens depending on their class (normal skin, AK, or SCC). The number of genes used was controlled by a thresholding parameter, which was determined with a 10-fold cross-validation. We used the imputation engine method with the k-nearest neighbor (n = 10), and the threshold 3.5 was chosen to minimize the overall error rate. This cross validation also allows a judgment of the classification quality. For the detailed mathematic procedure, see Tibshirani et al. [48]. In addition, we have independently applied the ANOVA model using two different p-values (p < 0.05 and p < 0.15) to identify dysregulated genes between three groups (normal skin, AK, and SCC) and two groups (AK and SCC) to focus on differences between these two groups. Multiple testing corrections were performed by the false discovery rate of Benjamini and Hochberg for all analyses. Hierarchical clustering was performed with the genes best characterizing normal skin and NMSC identified by PAM. Genes of all 15 specimens with different expression profiles were grouped by standard correlation with GeneSpring software package 6.1. Hierarchical clustering of the genes was based on similarities of expression levels.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR with the LightCycler system (Roche) was used as an independent method to validate the microarray expression data and to assess quantitative gene expression. Thirteen genes were selected including 9 up-regulated and 4 down-regulated genes in NMSC with low, moderate, and high change folds. In addition, 3 of the 13 genes (MMP1, RAB31, and TNC) were verified with an increased number of different specimens of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients (22 normal skin, 11 AK, and 15 SCC) (see Methods section 'Patients'). RT was performed with the "Superscript First-Strand Synthesis-System" (Invitrogen) using oligo-dT as described by the manufacturer. The concentration of cDNA was quantified with "OliGreen ssDNA Quantitation Kit" (Molecular Probes, Leiden, Netherlands). Specific PCR primers for the target genes were designed using the Primer3 software program [50], and synthesized by Metabion (Planegg-Martinsried, Germany). The primers of each gene were located in different exons to exclude DNA contamination. Amplification mix (20 μl) contained 20 ng of cDNA, 500 nM of each primer, 2 μl LightCycler FastStart Reaction Mix Syber Green I (Roche), 3 mM MgCl2 and sterile double distilled water. The concentration of MgCl2 varied depending on each specific primer pair between 3–5 mM. PCR reaction was initiated with 10 min denaturation at 95°C followed by 40 cycles (95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 5 sec, and 72°C for 10 sec). Fluorescence detection was performed immediately at the end of each annealing step and the purity of each amplification product was confirmed by generating melting curves. All specific RT-PCR products of target genes were purified by gel extraction and confirmed by sequencing with gene specific primers (Table 3) using the DNA sequencing kit and the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). A negative control without reverse transcriptase was included in each PCR experiment. The expression of RPS9 was used to control equal RNA loading and to normalize relative expression data for all other genes analyzed. The copy ratio of each analyzed cDNA was determined as the mean of two experiments. The U-Test of Wilcoxon, Mann, and Whitney was applied for estimation of differentially expressed transcripts identified by real-time RT-PCR. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant for alpha.

Abbreviations

AK, actinic keratosis; EST, expressed sequence tag; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; RT, reverse transcription; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TX, organ transplant; UV, ultraviolett radiation; PAM, predicition analysis of microarrays

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
  48 in total

1.  Malignant transformation of solar keratoses to squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R Marks; G Rennie; T S Selwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  U Alon; N Barkai; D A Notterman; K Gish; S Ybarra; D Mack; A J Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cloning and sequence analysis of candidate human natural killer-enhancing factor genes.

Authors:  H Shau; L H Butterfield; R Chiu; A Kim
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers.

Authors:  C M Perou; S S Jeffrey; M van de Rijn; C A Rees; M B Eisen; D T Ross; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S X Zhu; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells.

Authors:  L Zhang; W Zhou; V E Velculescu; S E Kern; R H Hruban; S R Hamilton; B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Molecular cloning of two novel rab genes from human melanocytes.

Authors:  D Chen; J Guo; T Miki; M Tachibana; W A Gahl
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 7.  Molecules in focus: tenascin-C.

Authors:  E J Mackie
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.085

8.  Isolation and characterization of Nmi, a novel partner of Myc proteins.

Authors:  J Bao; A S Zervos
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Functional association of Nmi with Stat5 and Stat1 in IL-2- and IFNgamma-mediated signaling.

Authors:  M Zhu; S John; M Berg; W J Leonard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-01-08       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1, -2 and -3 in squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis.

Authors:  R Tsukifuji; K Tagawa; A Hatamochi; H Shinkai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  51 in total

1.  Development of amidine-based sphingosine kinase 1 nanomolar inhibitors and reduction of sphingosine 1-phosphate in human leukemia cells.

Authors:  Andrew J Kennedy; Thomas P Mathews; Yugesh Kharel; Saundra D Field; Morgan L Moyer; James E East; Joseph D Houck; Kevin R Lynch; Timothy L Macdonald
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Antitumorigenesis of antioxidants in a transgenic Rac1 model of Kaposi's sarcoma.

Authors:  Qi Ma; Lucas E Cavallin; Bin Yan; Shoukang Zhu; Elda Margarita Duran; Huili Wang; Laura P Hale; Chunming Dong; Ethel Cesarman; Enrique A Mesri; Pascal J Goldschmidt-Clermont
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The p53 target Wig-1: a regulator of mRNA stability and stem cell fate?

Authors:  A Vilborg; C Bersani; M T Wilhelm; K G Wiman
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Cytokine-induced tumor suppressors: a GRIM story.

Authors:  Dhan V Kalvakolanu; Shreeram C Nallar; Sudhakar Kalakonda
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.861

5.  Differential expression of degradome components in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Nijaguna B Prasad; Anne C Fischer; Alice Y Chuang; Jerry M Wright; Ting Yang; Hua-Ling Tsai; William H Westra; Nanette J Liegeois; Allan D Hess; Anthony P Tufaro
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Akt3 induces oxidative stress and DNA damage by activating the NADPH oxidase via phosphorylation of p47phox.

Authors:  Christos Polytarchou; Maria Hatziapostolou; Tung On Yau; Niki Christodoulou; Philip W Hinds; Filippos Kottakis; Ioannis Sanidas; Philip N Tsichlis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Role of Fibroblast Growth Factor-Binding Protein 1 in Skin Carcinogenesis and Inflammation.

Authors:  Marcel Oliver Schmidt; Khalid Ammar Garman; Yong Gu Lee; Chong Zuo; Patrick James Beck; Mingjun Tan; Juan Antonio Aguilar-Pimentel; Markus Ollert; Carsten Schmidt-Weber; Helmut Fuchs; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Hrabe de Angelis; Elena Tassi; Anna Tate Riegel; Anton Wellstein
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  The role of YY1 in reduced HP1alpha gene expression in invasive human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jason G Lieberthal; Marissa Kaminsky; Christopher N Parkhurst; Naoko Tanese
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  PAI-1 Regulates the Invasive Phenotype in Human Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Freytag; Cynthia E Wilkins-Port; Craig E Higgins; J Andrew Carlson; Agnes Noel; Jean-Michel Foidart; Stephen P Higgins; Rohan Samarakoon; Paul J Higgins
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 10.  Targeting SphK1 as a new strategy against cancer.

Authors:  Dai Shida; Kazuaki Takabe; Dmitri Kapitonov; Sheldon Milstien; Sarah Spiegel
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.465

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.