Literature DB >> 16890214

Modeling response signal and response time data.

Roger Ratcliff1.   

Abstract

The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) and the leaky competing accumulator model (LCA, Usher & McClelland, 2001) were tested against two-choice data collected from the same subjects with the standard response time procedure and the response signal procedure. In the response signal procedure, a stimulus is presented and then, at one of a number of experimenter-determined times, a signal to respond is presented. The models were fit to the data from the two procedures simultaneously under the assumption that responses in the response signal procedure were based on a mixture of decision processes that had already terminated at response boundaries before the signal and decision processes that had not yet terminated. In the latter case, decisions were based on partial information in one variant of each model or on guessing in a second variant. Both variants of the diffusion model fit the data well and both fit better than either variant of the LCA model, although the differences in numerical goodness-of-fit measures were not large enough to allow decisive selection between the models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16890214      PMCID: PMC2397556          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  38 in total

1.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

2.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Pablo Gomez; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-06

3.  Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff; Bradley J Wolfgang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

8.  Structure and process in semantic memory: new evidence based on speed-accuracy decomposition.

Authors:  J Kounios; A M Osman; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1987-03

9.  Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions.

Authors:  B Espinoza-Varas; C S Watson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-02

10.  Semantic memory retrieval: analysis by speed accuracy tradeoff functions.

Authors:  A T Corbett; W A Wickelgren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  73 in total

1.  Cortical topography of intracortical inhibition influences the speed of decision making.

Authors:  Claudia Wilimzig; Patrick Ragert; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Michaël A Stevens; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Inhibition in superior colliculus neurons in a brightness discrimination task?

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Yukako T Hasegawa; Ryohei P Hasegawa; Russ Childers; Philip L Smith; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Marc W Howard; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.