Literature DB >> 8036100

Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions.

B Espinoza-Varas1, C S Watson.   

Abstract

The effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions were examined. The stimuli comprised two, partly overlapping, "normal" distributions of either two-digit numbers or tonal frequencies. Individual stimuli were randomly sampled from the distributions, and subjects had to decide from which distribution the stimulus was sampled. The decision goal was to maximize the expected gain using three different payoff matrices. Decision latencies with and without prior knowledge of optimal decision criteria were measured. In a control task, subjects were asked only to label stimuli as being either above or below the optimal criteria (without regard for a posteriori probabilities or expected gain). The relation between criterion and latency was examined by means of a trial-by-trial analysis of the stimuli and the responses. Response latency was inversely related both to the distance between the stimulus and the decision criterion and to the probability of the response elicited by the stimulus. Response latencies showed a maximum at the criterion in all conditions. These results were obtained with different stimulus modalities (tones or numbers), different discriminability levels within the auditory modality, and different decision tasks. It is proposed that the decision criterion is the primary determinant of response latencies of binary decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8036100     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  CATEGORIZING EXTERNALLY DISTRIBUTED STIMULUS SAMPLES FOR THREE CONTINUA.

Authors:  W LEE; M JANKE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-10

2.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.

Authors:  R J AUDLEY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Response latency models for signal detection.

Authors:  R Pike
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Reaction time in the detection of vibrotactile signals.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; J H Wright; M B Evans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

5.  Reaction-time distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise.

Authors:  E C Carterette; M P Friedman; R Cosmides
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory--a direct solution.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; E Alf
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  More on the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; M J Hacker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

10.  Judgments of sameness and difference: experiments on decision time.

Authors:  D Bindra; J A Williams; J S Wise
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-12-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Reaction time signatures of discriminative processes: differential effects of stimulus similarity and incentive.

Authors:  Donald S Blough
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Children are not like older adults: a diffusion model analysis of developmental changes in speeded responses.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jessica Love; Clarissa A Thompson; John E Opfer
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-12-21

4.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

5.  Modeling unidimensional categorization in monkeys.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff; Anil Cherian; Mark Segraves
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Modeling response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

10.  Comparing categorization models.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.