Literature DB >> 16889473

Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer.

Craig K Abbey1, Miguel P Eckstein.   

Abstract

We consider three simple forced-choice visual tasks--detection, contrast discrimination, and identification--in Gaussian white noise. The three tasks are designed so that the difference signal in all three cases is the same difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) profile. The distribution of the image noise implies that the ideal observer uses the same DOG filter to perform all three tasks. But do human observers also use the same visual strategy to perform these tasks? We use classification image analysis to evaluate the visual strategies of human observers. We find significantly different subject classification images across the three tasks. The domain of greatest variability appears to be low spatial frequencies [<5 cycles per degree (cpd)]. In this range, we find frequency enhancement in the detection task, and frequency suppression and reversal in the contrast discrimination task. In the identification task, subject classification images agree reasonably well with the ideal observer filter. We evaluate the effect of nonlinear transducers and intrinsic spatial uncertainty to explain divergence from the ideal observer found in detection and contrast discrimination tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16889473     DOI: 10.1167/6.4.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  19 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Detection of changes in luminance distributions.

Authors:  Thomas Y Lee; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Search in 1/f 2.8 Filtered Noise and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Phantoms.

Authors:  Aditya Jonnalagadda; Miguel A Lago; Bruno Barufaldi; Predrag R Bakic; Craig K Abbey; Andrew D Maidment; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Efficient visual-search model observers for PET.

Authors:  H C Gifford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The surprisingly high human efficiency at learning to recognize faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Foveated Model Observers for Visual Search in 3D Medical Images.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, non-linearity.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.