Literature DB >> 16887791

Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?

Beth K Rush1, Deanna M Barch, Todd S Braver.   

Abstract

Age-related deficits in context processing were examined in relationship to two predominant theories of cognitive aging (the Inhibitory Deficit and Processing Speed Models). Older and younger adults completed a measure of context processing (AX Continuous Performance Test (CPT) task) as well as a computerized battery of inhibitory tasks: Stroop, garden path sentences, go no-go, and the stop-signal paradigm. Participants also completed a simple processing speed task. After controlling for baseline differences in processing speed, age effects were detected on the AX-CPT. Smaller, but significant age effects were noted on the Stroop and stop-signal tasks, but no significant age effects were found on the garden path sentence and go no-go tasks. Intertask correlations were weak, providing little evidence for a homogenous or uniform construct of inhibition. The sensitivity of the AX-CPT to cognitive aging is discussed in the context of existing theories of cognitive aging. The authors suggest that deficits in context processing and utilization may underlie cognitive aging phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16887791     DOI: 10.1080/13825580600680703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  50 in total

1.  Learning to ignore distracters.

Authors:  Ellen Rozek; Susan Kemper; Joan McDowd
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  Separating the fish from the sharks: a longitudinal study of preschool response inhibition.

Authors:  Sandra A Wiebe; Tiffany D Sheffield; Kimberly Andrews Espy
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-04-25

Review 3.  Session II: Mechanisms of age-related cognitive change and targets for intervention: neural circuits, networks, and plasticity.

Authors:  Charles DeCarli; Claudia Kawas; John H Morrison; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Reisa A Sperling; Clinton B Wright
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Age-related increases in Stroop interference: delineation of general slowing based on behavioral and white matter analyses.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Lisa Zschutschke; Armin Scheurich; Florian Schmitz; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging.

Authors:  Jessica L Paxton; Deanna M Barch; Caroline A Racine; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.