Literature DB >> 6367942

Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes.

J E Ware.   

Abstract

The focus of assessment of disease impact is moving beyond survival and biomedical outcomes to include a comprehensive set of health status and quality of life concepts. We have discussed four socially relevant concepts that can be thought of as dimensions of health status or well being: physiologic status, personal (physical) functioning, mental health, and social well-being. Quality of life was also discussed briefly as a very global concept encompassing these health status dimensions and a broader set of concepts including finances, housing, and employment. Five categories of measures based on manifest content were also discussed, including measures of disease/diagnostic status, personal functioning, mental health, general health perceptions, and social/role functioning. The physiologic dimension of health is very heterogeneous and includes many concepts and measures that vary largely independently of each other and that differ in terms of their impact on the other dimensions of health status. The physical, mental, and social dimensions of health and well-being also can be measured many different ways, and each can be broken down into distinct concepts that may vary in importance from one study to another. Of these three concepts, social well-being is the most heterogeneous. To assist investigators searching for valid measures of specific health status and quality of life concepts, we recommended formal estimations of measurement models. A preliminary model of 15 health status measures was presented to illustrate the usefulness of such a model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6367942     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.1984.53.s10.2316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  33 in total

1.  The contextual model of HRQoL: a paradigm for expanding the HRQoL framework.

Authors:  Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Examining predictive models of HRQOL in a population-based, multiethnic sample of women with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Judith S Tejero; Jinsook Kim; Geraldine V Padilla; Gerhard Hellemann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The satisfaction of Latina breast cancer survivors with their healthcare and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Kimberly A Wildes; Alexander R Miller; Sandra San Miguel de Majors; Pamela M Otto; Amelie G Ramirez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Methods of assessing the effect of drug therapy on quality of life.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Quality of life measures in cancer chemotherapy: methodology and implications.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ) for assessing quality of life in pediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  Bernadette Henry; Pierre Aussage; Cécile Grosskopf; Jean-Marie Goehrs
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The frequency of social dysfunction in a general population sample and in patients with mental disorders. A comparison using the Social Interview Schedule (SIS).

Authors:  H Hecht; H U Wittchen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Describing the health-related quality of life impact of HIV infection: findings from a study using the HIV Overview of Problems--Evaluation System (HOPES).

Authors:  P A Ganz; C A Coscarelli Schag; B Kahn; L Petersen; K Hirji
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Quality of life during clinical trials: conceptual model for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS).

Authors:  P J Hollen; R J Gralla; M G Kris; C Cox
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  To be young, Black, and living with breast cancer: a systematic review of health-related quality of life in young Black breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Cleo A Samuel; Laura C Pinheiro; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Jennifer S Walker; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Shekinah A Fashaw; Cheryl Woods-Giscombe; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.