Literature DB >> 16885345

Real-time evaluation of p53 oscillatory behavior in vivo using bioluminescent imaging.

Daniel A Hamstra1, Mahaveer S Bhojani, Laura B Griffin, Bharathi Laxman, Brian D Ross, Alnawaz Rehemtulla.   

Abstract

p53 is a key mediator of cellular response to stress, and, although its function has been carefully evaluated in vitro, noninvasive evaluation of the transcriptional activity of p53 in live animals has not been reported. To this end, we developed a transgenic mouse model wherein the firefly luciferase gene expression was dependent on the p53-responsive P2 promoter from the murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene. Bioluminescence activity following ionizing radiation was shown to be dose, time, and p53 dependent. In addition, expression of both p53 and its activated form as well as the expression of p53 target genes (MDM2 and p21) correlated with bioluminescence activity. Temporal evaluation of p53 activity following ionizing radiation showed a distinct oscillatory pattern, which confirmed the oscillations observed previously in cultured cells. In addition, the kinetics of oscillations were altered by pretreatment with radiation-modifying agents. These results show the use of this mouse model in enhancing our understanding of the transcriptional role of p53 in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885345     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  36 in total

1.  Using targeted transgenic reporter mice to study promoter-specific p53 transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Amanda M Goh; Chin Yan Lim; Poh Cheang Chiam; Ling Li; Michael B Mann; Karen M Mann; Sergio Menendez; David P Lane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transcription factor oscillations induce differential gene expressions.

Authors:  Keng Boon Wee; Wee Kheng Yio; Uttam Surana; Keng Hwee Chiam
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Population robustness arising from cellular heterogeneity.

Authors:  Pawel Paszek; Sheila Ryan; Louise Ashall; Kate Sillitoe; Claire V Harper; David G Spiller; David A Rand; Michael R H White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recurrent initiation: a mechanism for triggering p53 pulses in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Eric Batchelor; Caroline S Mock; Irun Bhan; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Computational analysis of dynamical responses to the intrinsic pathway of programmed cell death.

Authors:  Tongli Zhang; Paul Brazhnik; John J Tyson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage vary across cell lines and are shaped by efficiency of DNA repair and activity of the kinase ATM.

Authors:  Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.192

7.  Fourier analysis and systems identification of the p53 feedback loop.

Authors:  Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Erez Dekel; Eric Batchelor; Galit Lahav; Uri Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Encoding and decoding cellular information through signaling dynamics.

Authors:  Jeremy E Purvis; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Predicted functions of MdmX in fine-tuning the response of p53 to DNA damage.

Authors:  Sohyoung Kim; Mirit I Aladjem; Geoffrey B McFadden; Kurt W Kohn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Stress-specific response of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop.

Authors:  Alexander Hunziker; Mogens H Jensen; Sandeep Krishna
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.