Literature DB >> 28442631

p53 dynamics in response to DNA damage vary across cell lines and are shaped by efficiency of DNA repair and activity of the kinase ATM.

Jacob Stewart-Ornstein1, Galit Lahav2.   

Abstract

Cellular systems show a wide range of signaling dynamics. Many of these dynamics are highly stereotyped, such as oscillations at a fixed frequency. However, most studies looking at the role of signaling dynamics focus on one or a few cell lines, leaving the diversity of dynamics across tissues or cell lines a largely unexplored question. We focused on the dynamics of the tumor suppressor protein p53, which regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. We established live-cell reporters for 12 cancer cell lines expressing wild-type p53 and quantified p53 dynamics in response to double-strand break-inducing DNA damage. In many of the tested cell lines, we found that p53 abundance oscillated in response to ionizing radiation or the DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic neocarzinostatin and that the periodicity of the oscillations was fixed. In other cell lines, p53 abundance dynamically changed in different ways, such as a single broad pulse or a continuous induction. By combining single-cell assays of p53 signaling dynamics, small-molecule screening in live cells, and mathematical modeling, we identified molecules that perturbed p53 dynamics and determined that cell-specific variation in the efficiency of DNA repair and the activity of the kinase ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) controlled the signaling landscape of p53 dynamics. Because the dynamics of wild-type p53 varied substantially between cell lines, our study highlights the limitation of using one line as a model system and emphasizes the importance of studying the dynamics of other signaling pathways across different cell lines and genetic backgrounds.
Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28442631      PMCID: PMC5504473          DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aah6671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Signal        ISSN: 1945-0877            Impact factor:   8.192


  26 in total

1.  Recurrent initiation: a mechanism for triggering p53 pulses in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Eric Batchelor; Caroline S Mock; Irun Bhan; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  An mTORC1-Mdm2-Drosha axis for miRNA biogenesis in response to glucose- and amino acid-deprivation.

Authors:  Peiying Ye; Yu Liu; Chong Chen; Fei Tang; Qi Wu; Xiang Wang; Chang-Gong Liu; Xiuping Liu; Runhua Liu; Yang Liu; Pan Zheng
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Dynamic response diversity of NFAT isoforms in individual living cells.

Authors:  Nissan Yissachar; Tali Sharar Fischler; Ariel A Cohen; Shlomit Reich-Zeliger; Dor Russ; Eric Shifrut; Ziv Porat; Nir Friedman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Inhibition of (ADP-ribose)n biosynthesis retards DNA repair but does not inhibit DNA repair synthesis.

Authors:  B W Durkacz; J Irwin; S Shall
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1981-08-31       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Dynamics of CDKN1A in Single Cells Defined by an Endogenous Fluorescent Tagging Toolkit.

Authors:  Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  S Banin; L Moyal; S Shieh; Y Taya; C W Anderson; L Chessa; N I Smorodinsky; C Prives; Y Reiss; Y Shiloh; Y Ziv
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage.

Authors:  R Maya; M Balass; S T Kim; D Shkedy; J F Leal; O Shifman; M Moas; T Buschmann; Z Ronai; Y Shiloh; M B Kastan; E Katzir; M Oren
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta inhibition enhances repair of DNA double-strand breaks in irradiated hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  Eddy S Yang; Somaira Nowsheen; Tong Wang; Dinesh K Thotala; Fen Xia
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Induction and repair of DNA damage in normal and ataxia-telangiectasia skin fibroblasts treated with neocarzinostatin.

Authors:  Y Shiloh; G P van der Schans; P H Lohman; Y Becker
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  DNA damage strength modulates a bimodal switch of p53 dynamics for cell-fate control.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Jia Chen; Siting Gan; Huaji Guan; Yuan Zhou; Qi Ouyang; Jue Shi
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  27 in total

1.  Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  José Reyes; Jia-Yun Chen; Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Kyle W Karhohs; Caroline S Mock; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Inferring Leading Interactions in the p53/Mdm2/Mdmx Circuit through Live-Cell Imaging and Modeling.

Authors:  Mathias L Heltberg; Sheng-Hong Chen; Alba Jiménez; Ashwini Jambhekar; Mogens H Jensen; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 10.304

3.  A Live-Cell Screen for Altered Erk Dynamics Reveals Principles of Proliferative Control.

Authors:  Alexander G Goglia; Maxwell Z Wilson; Siddhartha G Jena; Jillian Silbert; Lena P Basta; Danelle Devenport; Jared E Toettcher
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  Rucaparib Treatment Alters p53 Oscillations in Single Cells to Enhance DNA-Double-Strand-Break-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  Ryan L Hanson; Eric Batchelor
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Conservation and Divergence of p53 Oscillation Dynamics across Species.

Authors:  Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Ho Wa Jacky Cheng; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 6.  P53 at the start of the 21st century: lessons from elephants.

Authors:  Sue Haupt; Ygal Haupt
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-11-22

7.  Control of the Restriction Point by Rb and p21.

Authors:  Justin Moser; Iain Miller; Dylan Carter; Sabrina L Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Putting p53 in Context.

Authors:  Edward R Kastenhuber; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Understanding non-linear effects from Hill-type dynamics with application to decoding of p53 signaling.

Authors:  Xiaomin Shi; Jeffrey R Reimers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Expression of the Long Noncoding RNA DINO in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Cervical Cancer Cells Reactivates the Dormant TP53 Tumor Suppressor through ATM/CHK2 Signaling.

Authors:  Surendra Sharma; Karl Munger
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.