Literature DB >> 16885299

Comparative, collaborative, and on-site validation of a TaqMan PCR method as a tool for certified production of fresh, campylobacter-free chickens.

M Krause1, M H Josefsen, M Lund, N R Jacobsen, L Brorsen, M Moos, A Stockmarr, J Hoorfar.   

Abstract

Certified Campylobacter-free poultry products have been produced in Denmark since 2002, the first example of fresh (unprocessed and nonfrozen) chickens labeled "Campylobacter free." This success occurred partly through use of a 4-hour gel-based PCR testing scheme on fecal swabs. In this study, a faster, real-time PCR approach was validated in comparative and collaborative trials, based on recommendations from the Nordic system for validation of alternative microbiological methods (NordVal). The comparative real-time PCR trial was performed in comparison to two reference culture protocols on naturally contaminated samples (99 shoe covers, 101 cloacal swabs, 102 neck skins from abattoirs, and 100 retail neck skins). Culturing included enrichment in both Bolton and Preston broths followed by isolation on Preston agar and mCCDA. In one or both culture protocols, 169 samples were identified as positive. The comparative trial resulted in relative accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 98%, 95%, and 97%, respectively. The collaborative trial included nine laboratories testing neck skin, cloacal swab, and shoe cover samples, spiked with low, medium, and high concentrations of Campylobacter jejuni. Valid results were obtained from six of the participating laboratories. Accuracy for high levels was 100% for neck skin and cloacal swab samples. For low levels, accuracy was 100% and 92% for neck skin and cloacal swab samples, respectively; however, detection in shoe cover samples failed. A second collaborative trial, with an optimized DNA extraction procedure, gave 100% accuracy results for all three spiking levels. Finally, on-site validation at the abattoir on a flock basis was performed on 400 samples. Real-time PCR correctly identified 10 of 20 flocks as positive; thus, the method fulfilled the NordVal validation criteria and has since been implemented at a major abattoir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885299      PMCID: PMC1538729          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00291-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  14 in total

1.  A case-control study of risk factors for sporadic campylobacter infections in Denmark.

Authors:  J Neimann; J Engberg; K Mølbak; H C Wegener
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Towards an international standard for PCR-based detection of foodborne thermotolerant campylobacters: interaction of enrichment media and pre-PCR treatment on carcass rinse samples.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; P S Lübeck; F Hansen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Marianne Lund; Steen Nordentoft; Karl Pedersen; Mogens Madsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A real-time PCR assay for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni in foods after enrichment culture.

Authors:  Andrew D Sails; Andrew J Fox; Frederick J Bolton; David R A Wareing; David L A Greenway
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of three enrichment media for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from foods.

Authors:  C L Baylis; S MacPhee; K W Martin; T J Humphrey; R P Betts
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 6.  Outbreaks of campylobacter infection: rare events for a common pathogen.

Authors:  R G Pebody; M J Ryan; P G Wall
Journal:  Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev       Date:  1997-03-07

7.  Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in turkey samples: evaluation of two automated enzyme immunoassays and conventional microbiological techniques.

Authors:  B Borck; H Stryhn; A K Ersbøll; K Pedersen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Direct real-time PCR quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken fecal and cecal samples by integrated cell concentration and DNA purification.

Authors:  Knut Rudi; Hilde Kristin Høidal; Tone Katla; Birgit Klungseth Johansen; John Nordal; Kjetill S Jakobsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Enrichment followed by quantitative PCR both for rapid detection and as a tool for quantitative risk assessment of food-borne thermotolerant campylobacters.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; N R Jacobsen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  A LightCycler real-time PCR hybridization probe assay for detecting food-borne thermophilic Campylobacter.

Authors:  Sylvie Perelle; Mathilde Josefsen; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Françoise Dilasser; Joël Grout; Patrick Fach
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  10 in total

1.  Optimization of a 12-hour TaqMan PCR-based method for detection of Salmonella bacteria in meat.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; M Krause; F Hansen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in commercial turkey flocks: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Isaac P Kashoma; Anand Kumar; Yasser M Sanad; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Rudovick R Kazwala; Rebecca Garabed; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Rapid quantification of viable Campylobacter bacteria on chicken carcasses, using real-time PCR and propidium monoazide treatment, as a tool for quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; C Löfström; T B Hansen; L S Christensen; J E Olsen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Risk factors for infection with Campylobacter jejuni flaA genotypes.

Authors:  L E Unicomb; L C O'Reilly; M D Kirk; R J Stafford; H V Smith; N G Becker; M S Patel; G L Gilbert
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence genes of thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from broiler production chain.

Authors:  Tassiana Ramires; Mauricéia Greici de Oliveira; Natalie Rauber Kleinubing; Simone de Fátima Rauber Würfel; Marcia Magalhães Mata; Mariana Almeida Iglesias; Graciela Volz Lopes; Odir Antônio Dellagostin; Wladimir Padilha da Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.476

6.  Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review.

Authors:  Joana Silva; Daniela Leite; Mariana Fernandes; Cristina Mena; Paul Anthony Gibbs; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Genotypic and phenotypic properties of cattle-associated Campylobacter and their implications to public health in the USA.

Authors:  Yasser M Sanad; Issmat I Kassem; Melanie Abley; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Jeffrey T LeJeune; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Towards diagnostic metagenomics of Campylobacter in fecal samples.

Authors:  Sandra Christine Andersen; Kristoffer Kiil; Christoffer Bugge Harder; Mathilde Hasseldam Josefsen; Søren Persson; Eva Møller Nielsen; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Validation of a same-day real-time PCR method for screening of meat and carcass swabs for Salmonella.

Authors:  Charlotta Löfström; Michael Krause; Mathilde H Josefsen; Flemming Hansen; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Gene-Based Pathogen Detection: Can We Use qPCR to Predict the Outcome of Diagnostic Metagenomics?

Authors:  Sandra Christine Andersen; Mette Sofie Rousing Fachmann; Kristoffer Kiil; Eva Møller Nielsen; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.