Literature DB >> 16885253

A cross-cultural survey of residents' perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority.

H Kobayashi1, M Pian-Smith, M Sato, R Sawa, T Takeshita, D Raemer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify perceived barriers to residents' questioning or challenging their seniors, to determine how these barriers affect decisions, and to assess how these barriers differ across cultures.
METHOD: A written questionnaire was administered to residents in teaching hospitals in the US and Japan to assess factors affecting residents' willingness to question or challenge their superiors. The responses were analyzed for statistical significance of differences between the two cultures and to determine the importance of issues affecting decisions.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 175 US and 65 Japanese residents, with an overall response rate of 71%. Trainees from both countries believe that questioning and challenging contribute to safety. The perceived importance of specific beliefs about the workplace differed across cultures in seven out of 22 questions. Residents' decisions to make a challenge were related to the relationships and perceived response of the superiors. There was no statistical difference between the US and Japanese residents in terms of the threshold for challenging their seniors.
CONCLUSION: We have identified attributes of residents' beliefs of communication, including several cross-cultural differences in the importance of values and issues affecting one's decision to question or challenge. In contrast, there was no difference in the threshold for challenging seniors by the Japanese and US residents studied. Changes in organizational and professional culture may be as important, if not more so, than national culture to encourage "speaking up". Residents should be encouraged to overcome barriers to challenging, and training programs should foster improved relationships and communication between trainers and trainees.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885253      PMCID: PMC2564023          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  10 in total

1.  How effective is cockpit resource management training? Exploring issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination.

Authors:  R L Helmreich; T R Chidester; H C Foushee; S Gregorich; J A Wilhelm
Journal:  Flight Saf Dig       Date:  1990-05

2.  Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload.

Authors:  J B Sexton; R L Helmreich
Journal:  Hum Perf Extrem Environ       Date:  2000-10

3.  Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sutcliffe; Elizabeth Lewton; Marilynn M Rosenthal
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  A 38-year-old woman with fetal loss and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin P Sachs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  How internal medicine residents resolve conflicts with attending physicians.

Authors:  N J Farber; J L Weiner; E G Boyer; E J Robinson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Cockpit resource management: exploring the attitude-performance linkage.

Authors:  R L Helmreich; H C Foushee; R Benson; W Russini
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1986-12

7.  Communication barriers between attending physicians and residents.

Authors:  J D McCue; K J Beach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Professional liability issues in graduate medical education.

Authors:  Allen Kachalia; David M Studdert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.

Authors:  L Lingard; S Espin; S Whyte; G Regehr; G R Baker; R Reznick; J Bohnen; B Orser; D Doran; E Grober
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

10.  Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education.

Authors:  Richard H Blum; Daniel B Raemer; John S Carroll; Neelakantan Sunder; David M Felstein; Jeffrey B Cooper
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.251

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Culture, communication and safety: lessons from the airline industry.

Authors:  Lori G d'Agincourt-Canning; Niranjan Kissoon; Mona Singal; Alexander F Pitfield
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Communication skills training on how to break bad news for Japanese nurses in oncology: effects of training on nurses' confidence and perceived effectiveness.

Authors:  Sakiko Fukui; Keiko Ogawa; Naoshi Fukui
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Cross-cultural Comparison of Pharmacy Students' Attitudes, Knowledge, Practice, and Barriers Regarding Evidence-based Medicine.

Authors:  Aya F Ozaki; Sari Nakagawa; Cynthia A Jackevicius
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  [Do residents and nurses communicate safety relevant concerns? : simulation study on the influence of the authority gradient].

Authors:  M St Pierre; A Scholler; D Strembski; G Breuer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review.

Authors:  Ayako Okuyama; Cordula Wagner; Bart Bijnen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Silence that can be dangerous: a vignette study to assess healthcare professionals' likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach; Katrin Gehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff's decisions to speak up about safety concerns.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach; Katrin Gehring
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Perception of medical professionalism among the surgical community in the University of Nairobi: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Daniel Kinyuru Ojuka; Joyce M Olenja; Nimrod J Mwango'mbe; Eunbae B Yang; Jana B Macleod
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Karen Mattick; Mark Pearson; Nicola Brennan; Simon Briscoe; Geoff Wong
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers.

Authors:  Sigall K Bell; Stephanie D Roche; Ariel Mueller; Erica Dente; Kristin O'Reilly; Barbara Sarnoff Lee; Kenneth Sands; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.