Literature DB >> 16882088

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle.

L R Schaeffer1.   

Abstract

Animals can be genotyped for thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at one time, where the SNPs are located at roughly 1-cM intervals throughout the genome. For each contiguous pair of SNPs there are four possible haplotypes that could be inherited from the sire. The effects of each interval on a trait can be estimated for all intervals simultaneously in a model where interval effects are random factors. Given the estimated effects of each haplotype for every interval in the genome, and given an animal's genotype, a 'genomic' estimated breeding value is obtained by summing the estimated effects for that genotype. The accuracy of that estimator of breeding values is around 80%. Because the genomic estimated breeding values can be calculated at birth, and because it has a high accuracy, a strategy that utilizes these advantages was compared with a traditional progeny testing strategy under a typical Canadian-like dairy cattle situation. Costs of proving bulls were reduced by 92% and genetic change was increased by a factor of 2. Genome-wide selection may become a popular tool for genetic improvement in livestock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882088     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  151 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Statistical modelling of growth using a mixed model with orthogonal polynomials.

Authors:  T Suchocki; J Szyda
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genomewide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations.

Authors:  C K Wong; R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes.

Authors:  M P L Calus; T H E Meuwissen; A P W de Roos; R F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.

Authors:  Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 7.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Selfing for the design of genomic selection experiments in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Jason LaCombe; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.

Authors:  Adriana García-Ruiz; John B Cole; Paul M VanRaden; George R Wiggans; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design.

Authors:  Sean Myles; Jason Peiffer; Patrick J Brown; Elhan S Ersoz; Zhiwu Zhang; Denise E Costich; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.