Literature DB >> 16880257

T-bet negatively regulates autoimmune myocarditis by suppressing local production of interleukin 17.

Manu Rangachari1, Nora Mauermann, René R Marty, Stephan Dirnhofer, Michael O Kurrer, Vukoslav Komnenovic, Josef M Penninger, Urs Eriksson.   

Abstract

Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) appears after infectious heart disease, the most common cause of dilated cardiomyopathy in humans. Here we report that mice lacking T-bet, a T-box transcription factor required for T helper (Th)1 cell differentiation and interferon (IFN)-gamma production, develop severe autoimmune heart disease compared to T-bet+/+ control mice. Experiments in T-bet-/- IL-4-/- and T-bet-/- IL-4Ralpha-/- mice, as well as transfer of heart-specific Th1 and Th2 cell lines, showed that autoimmune heart disease develops independently of Th1 or Th2 polarization. Analysis of T-bet-/- IL-12Rbeta1-/- and T-bet-/- IL-12p35-/- mice then identified interleukin (IL)-23 as critical for EAM pathogenesis. In addition, T-bet-/- mice showed a marked increase in production of the IL-23-dependent cytokine IL-17 by heart-infiltrating lymphocytes, and in vivo IL-17 depletion markedly reduced EAM severity in T-bet-/- mice. Heart-infiltrating T-bet-/- CD8+ but not CD8- T cells secrete IFN-gamma, which inhibits IL-17 production and protects against severe EAM. In contrast, T-bet-/- CD8+ lymphocytes completely lost their capacity to release IFN-gamma within the heart. Collectively, these data show that severe IL-17-mediated EAM can develop in the absence of T-bet, and that T-bet can regulate autoimmunity via the control of nonspecific CD8+ T cell bystander functions in the inflamed target organ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16880257      PMCID: PMC2118365          DOI: 10.1084/jem.20052222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), often resulting from Coxsackievirus B3 and Chlamydia-triggered myocarditis, may be present in up to one quarter of all cases of heart failure (1, 2). Notably, many affected individuals develop heart antigen–specific autoantibody responses (3), and immunosuppressive therapy can improve heart function in DCM patients who display no evidence of viral or bacterial genomes in heart biopsies (4). Interestingly, peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with DCM could adoptively transfer disease to SCID mice lacking T and B cells (5). These observations suggest that postinfectious autoimmune mechanisms promote disease development. Experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) is a mouse model of postinfectious myocarditis and cardiomyopathy (6). EAM can be induced in susceptible mouse strains by immunization with self-peptides derived from the myosin α heavy chain (MyHC-α). EAM is a CD4+ T cell–mediated disease (6–8), but the relative contributions of the CD4+ Th1 and Th2 subsets are unclear (9–13). The majority of infiltrating cells in EAM are macrophages, suggesting that Th1 signals predominate. Signaling through the key Th2 cytokine IL-4 is dispensable for the development of EAM (10). Furthermore, the p40 subunit of the Th1-driving cytokine IL-12 and the β1 receptor subunit of the IL-12R are essential for disease progression (10, 11). However, in vivo IL-4 blockade has been shown to reduce disease severity (12). At the same time, loss of either IFN-γ or its receptor results in increased disease severity, implying that this key Th1 cytokine is a negative regulator of EAM (10, 11, 13). As IFN-γ signaling may not be absolutely required for the development of Th1 responses (14), we tested the disease susceptibility of mice lacking T-bet, a T-box transcription factor essential for Th1 lineage differentiation (15, 16). T-bet CD4+ T cells display a profound defect in IFN-γ production in vitro, and T-bet expression is critical for the development of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, Crohn's disease, type 1 diabetes, and atherosclerosis (17–21). Here we show that in marked contrast to other autoimmune models, mice lacking T-bet develop severe EAM. MyHC-α–specific CD4+ T cells trigger autoimmune myocarditis regardless of Th1 or Th2 commitment. Analysis of T-bet IL-12Rβ1 −/− and T-bet IL-12p35 mice and antibody depletion experiments showed that IL-23 and IL-17 are critical for EAM pathogenesis. Loss of T-bet results in increased IL-17 production in the inflamed heart, and this tissue-specific repression depends on CD8+ T cell–mediated bystander suppression. Our data indicate that T-bet expressed in the CD8+ T cell compartment is a negative regulator of autoimmune heart disease.

RESULTS

T-bet mice develop severe myocarditis

IFN-γ production characterizes Th1 cells, and IFN-γ secreted from Th1 cells strongly activates macrophages and actively represses transcription of IL-4 (22). Absence of IFN-γ receptor signaling, however, does not exclude Th1 commitment in EAM because CD4+ T cells from MyHC-α–immunized IFN-γR −/− mice were highly competent to produce IFN-γ upon in vitro restimulation (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20052222/DC1). We therefore clarified the role of Th1 responses in EAM using mice genetically deficient for T-bet, a T-box transcription factor essential for Th1 cell lineage commitment (15). Surprisingly, T-bet mice developed severe EAM after immunization with MyHC-α emulsified in CFA (Fig. 1, A and B, and Table I) as well as upon injection of activated MyHC-α–loaded, T-bet bone marrow–derived DCs (BMDCs) (Table I).
Figure 1.

T-bet and T-bet mice were immunized with MyHC-α peptide in CFA and killed 21 d later. (A) Severity scores of individual diseased T-bet versus T-bet mice: ***, P < 0.000001. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections from hearts of immunized mice. MyHC-α–immunized T-bet (top left), MyHC-α–immunized T-bet (top right), T-bet immunized with CFA alone (bottom left), and MyHC-α–immunized T-bet IL-4 .

Table I.

Myocarditis prevalence and severity in MyHC-α–immunized mice

Mice(genotype)ImmunizationDisease prevalence(no. diseased/no. treated)Mean score of diseased mice
T-bet −/− MyHC-α/CFA18/183.56a e h l r
T-bet +/+ MyHC-α/CFA16/19j m 2a b c d g k p
IL-4 −/− MyHC-α/CFA3/41.67b f
IL-4Rα −/− MyHC-α/CFA3/42c i
T-bet −/− IL-4 −/− MyHC-α/CFA4/43.75d e f
T-bet −/− IL-4Rα −/− MyHC-α/CFA5/53.8g h i
IL-12Rβ1 −/− MyHC-α/CFA0/4j n n.a.
IL-12p35 −/− MyHC-α/CFA5/51.6k l q
T-bet −/− IL-12Rβ1 −/− MyHC-α/CFA0/6m n o n.a.
T-bet −/− IL-12p35 −/− MyHC-α/CFA6/63.67p q r
T-bet +/+ MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet +/+ DCs4/51.5s t
T-bet −/− MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet +/+ DCs5/52.6s
T-bet +/+ MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet −/− DCs3/31.67t
IL-12p35 +/+ MyHC-α–pulsed IL-12p35 +/+ DCs4/41.87u
IL-12p35 +/+ MyHC-α–pulsed IL-12p35 −/− DCs4/42.25u

Hematoxylin and eosin sections were scored as described in Materials and methods. CFA/MyHC-α–immunized mice were killed on day 21, and DC-immunized mice were killed on day 10. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test unless otherwise indicated. n.a., not applicable.

P < 0.000001, T-bet versus T-bet .

P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-4 .

P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-4Rα .

P < 0.0008, T-bet versus T-bet IL-4 .

P < n.s., T-bet versus T-bet IL-4 .

P < 0.029, IL-4 versus T-bet IL-4 .

P < 0.0002, T-bet versus T-bet IL-4Rα .

P < n.s., T-bet versus T-bet IL-4Rα .

P < 0.036, IL-4Ra versus T-bet IL-4Ra .

P < 0.004, T-bet versus IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test).

P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-12p35 .

P < 0.0001, T-bet versus IL-12p35 .

P < 0.0005, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test).

P < n.s, IL-12Rβ1 versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test).

P < 0.000007, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test).

P < 0.002, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12p35 .

P < 0.009, IL-12p35 versus T-bet IL-12p35 .

P < n.s, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12p35 .

P < 0.0317, T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized) versus T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized).

P < n.s, T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized) versus T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized).

P < n.s., IL-12p35+/+ (IL-12p35 DC-immunized) versus IL-12p35+/+ (IL-12p35 DC-immunized).

T-bet and T-bet mice were immunized with MyHC-α peptide in CFA and killed 21 d later. (A) Severity scores of individual diseased T-bet versus T-bet mice: ***, P < 0.000001. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections from hearts of immunized mice. MyHC-α–immunized T-bet (top left), MyHC-α–immunized T-bet (top right), T-bet immunized with CFA alone (bottom left), and MyHC-α–immunized T-bet IL-4 . Myocarditis prevalence and severity in MyHC-α–immunized mice Hematoxylin and eosin sections were scored as described in Materials and methods. CFA/MyHC-α–immunized mice were killed on day 21, and DC-immunized mice were killed on day 10. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test unless otherwise indicated. n.a., not applicable. P < 0.000001, T-bet versus T-bet . P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-4 . P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-4Rα . P < 0.0008, T-bet versus T-bet IL-4 . P < n.s., T-bet versus T-bet IL-4 . P < 0.029, IL-4 versus T-bet IL-4 . P < 0.0002, T-bet versus T-bet IL-4Rα . P < n.s., T-bet versus T-bet IL-4Rα . P < 0.036, IL-4Ra versus T-bet IL-4Ra . P < 0.004, T-bet versus IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test). P < n.s, T-bet versus IL-12p35 . P < 0.0001, T-bet versus IL-12p35 . P < 0.0005, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test). P < n.s, IL-12Rβ1 versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test). P < 0.000007, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12Rβ1 (Fisher's exact test). P < 0.002, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12p35 . P < 0.009, IL-12p35 versus T-bet IL-12p35 . P < n.s, T-bet versus T-bet IL-12p35 . P < 0.0317, T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized) versus T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized). P < n.s, T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized) versus T-bet (T-bet DC-immunized). P < n.s., IL-12p35+/+ (IL-12p35 DC-immunized) versus IL-12p35+/+ (IL-12p35 DC-immunized). Inflammatory infiltrates in the hearts of immunized T-bet and T-bet mice consisted of granulocytes and mononuclear cells, including macrophages and lymphocytes. T-bet hearts showed slightly greater eosinophilia and less fibrosis as compared with T-bet hearts, suggesting a Th2-biased response (not depicted). Immunohistochemical analysis, however, showed no apparent differences in relative numbers of CD68+ macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells between diseased T-bet and T-bet hearts (Fig. 2). FACS analysis indicated that proportions of CD4+ versus CD8+ heart-infiltrating cells were also comparable in T-bet and T-bet mice (not depicted).
Figure 2.

Characterization of heart-infiltrating cells in Frozen heart sections from MyHC-α–immunized T-bet and T-bet mice were stained to determine proportions of infiltrating macrophages (CD68, right) and lymphocytes (CD4, second from left; CD8, second from right).

Characterization of heart-infiltrating cells in Frozen heart sections from MyHC-α–immunized T-bet and T-bet mice were stained to determine proportions of infiltrating macrophages (CD68, right) and lymphocytes (CD4, second from left; CD8, second from right). The increase in EAM severity observed in IFN-γ mice has been explained by impaired apoptosis of activated CD4+ T cells as well as by unrestricted expansion of CD4+CD44high T cells (23). However, we saw no evidence of impaired cell death in CD4+ T cells isolated from MyHC-α–immunized T-bet mice, nor did we observe any increase in the numbers of peripheral CD4+CD44high cells in these mice (not depicted). Furthermore, most T-bet mice, but none of the IFN-γR animals, slowly recovered from disease within 2 mo after immunization (not depicted), suggesting that loss of T-bet does not mimic IFN-γ deficiency in EAM.

T-bet mice develop an autoreactive Th2 response

Consistent with the idea of CD4+ T cell–mediated disease and enhanced disease severity in T-bet mice, in vitro recall responses of T-bet CD4+ T cells to MyHC-α were increased in comparison with T-bet controls (Fig. 3 A). To exclude the possibility that T-bet does not act as a Th1 transcription factor in BALB/c mice, we measured IFN-γ and IL-4 production in T-bet and T-bet CD4+ T cells. In fact, CD4+ T cells from immunized T-bet mice produced no IFN-γ but significant amounts of IL-4 relative to T-bet CD4+ T cells upon in vitro restimulation (Fig. 3 B). Furthermore, diseased T-bet mice displayed a complete lack of myosin-specific IgG2a, a Th1-dependent antibody isotype (Fig. 3 C). Collectively, these data indicate that Th1 differentiation is not required for the development of autoimmune myocarditis and confirm a Th2 phenotype of MyHC-α–specific T-bet CD4+ T cells.
Figure 3.

CD4 CD4+ T cells from T-bet (blue bars) and T-bet mice (red bars) were restimulated with either MyHC-α or control OVA peptide. (A) Proliferative responses after 48 h, and (B) IFN-γ and IL-4 production in supernatants after 40 h of restimulation, representative of three independent experiments. (C) Serum MyHC-α autoantibody responses from immunized T-bet (blue) and T-bet (red) mice at day 21. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

CD4 CD4+ T cells from T-bet (blue bars) and T-bet mice (red bars) were restimulated with either MyHC-α or control OVA peptide. (A) Proliferative responses after 48 h, and (B) IFN-γ and IL-4 production in supernatants after 40 h of restimulation, representative of three independent experiments. (C) Serum MyHC-α autoantibody responses from immunized T-bet (blue) and T-bet (red) mice at day 21. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

EAM develops regardless of Th1 or Th2 differentiation

IL-4 is a key determinant of Th2 differentiation (24). To test the possibility that the exaggerated production of IL-4 seen from T-bet CD4+ T cells could increase disease severity, we crossed T-bet mutant mice onto IL-4– and IL-4Rα–deficient strains. Intriguingly, both T-bet IL-4 and T-bet IL4-Rα mice developed severe EAM relative to T-bet and IL-4 or IL4-Rα controls. However, disease in T-bet IL-4 and T-bet IL-4Rα mice was comparable in severity to that seen in T-bet mice (Fig. 1 B and Table I). This demonstrates that the exacerbated disease seen in T-bet mice is not due to increased IL-4 signaling. To directly examine the pathogenic role of MyHC-α–specific CD4+ T cells, we derived MyHC-α–specific CD4+ lines from immunized T-bet and T-bet mice. T-bet CD4+ T cell lines were skewed toward a Th1 phenotype, as they produced large amounts of IFN-γ, but no IL-4, upon restimulation. In contrast, T-bet lines were Th2 skewed, as they produced no IFN-γ yet generated high levels of IL-4 (Fig. 4 A). Adoptive transfer of both T-bet and T-bet lines induced myocarditis of comparable disease severity in T-bet recipient mice (Fig. 4 B). These data suggest that EAM can develop regardless of whether Th1 or Th2 signals predominate in MyHC-α–specific CD4+ T cells.
Figure 4.

Th1 as well as Th2 CD4 (A) MyHC-α–specific lines were generated by subjecting CD4+ splenocytes from immunized T-bet (blue) or T-bet (red) mice to multiple rounds of antigen restimulation followed by rest in minimal IL-2. Supernatant was collected for ELISA 48 h after the third antigen restimulation. ***, P < 0.0001. One representative experiment is shown. (B) Both MyHC-α–specific Th1 cell lines (left) and Th2 cell lines (right) are pathogenic in wild-type recipient mice. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections: bar: 50 μm.

Th1 as well as Th2 CD4 (A) MyHC-α–specific lines were generated by subjecting CD4+ splenocytes from immunized T-bet (blue) or T-bet (red) mice to multiple rounds of antigen restimulation followed by rest in minimal IL-2. Supernatant was collected for ELISA 48 h after the third antigen restimulation. ***, P < 0.0001. One representative experiment is shown. (B) Both MyHC-α–specific Th1 cell lines (left) and Th2 cell lines (right) are pathogenic in wild-type recipient mice. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections: bar: 50 μm.

Myocarditis induction in T-bet mice is IL-23 dependent

IL-12 is produced in large amounts by activated DCs and macrophages, and it strongly induces Th1 differentiation (25). By inducing the up-regulation of IL-12Rβ2, T-bet can increase Th1 cell sensitivity to IL-12 and thereby stabilize Th1 lineage commitment (26, 27). In addition, IL-12p40 −/− and IL-12Rβ1 −/− mice are resistant to EAM (10, 11). However, IL-12 shares the p40 subunit with the related cytokine IL-23, and the IL-23 receptor heterodimer contains IL-12Rβ1. Indeed, many of the immunological and pathogenic functions initially attributed to IL-12 have now been described as IL-23 dependent (28). We therefore sought to examine whether the severe EAM that develops in the absence of T-bet could be regulated by either IL-12 or IL-23. We crossed T-bet mice onto an IL-12p35–deficient strain, which specifically lacks IL-12. IL-12p35 mice developed disease of a severity comparable to wild-type mice, whereas T-bet IL-12p35 mice developed severe EAM at a level similar to T-bet mice (Table I). DCs are a major source of IL-12 production (28); however, activated and MyHC-α–pulsed IL-12p35 BMDCs were as capable as IL-12p35 +/+ counterparts of inducing myocarditis in wild-type recipients (Table I). We then examined the effect of loss of T-bet on an IL-12Rβ1 strain, which lacks both the IL-12 and the IL-23 receptors. Strikingly, IL-12Rβ1 −/− and T-bet IL-12Rβ1 mice were resistant to EAM (Table I). These data show that IL-23, rather than IL-12, is a key pathogenic cytokine in EAM. Moreover, they indicate that loss of IL-23 signaling can abrogate the development of exacerbated EAM seen in T-bet mice.

Increased IL-17 in the heart, but not peripheral lymphoid tissue, of immunized T-bet mice

Recent findings suggest that IL-23 plays an important role in the expansion of an IL-17–producing subset of CD4+ T cells (ThIL-17) in vitro (29, 30). These cells play an essential role in the infectious response (31, 32) as well as in autoimmunity (33–35). Further data have shown that the ThIL-17 lineage is distinct from Th1, and that IFN-γ and T-bet can repress CD4+ T cell production of IL-17 (30, 35). In light of our finding that deficiency in IL-23 signaling could rescue T-bet mice from severe EAM, we examined whether increased generation of ThIL-17 cells could explain the exacerbated disease seen in T-bet mice. Restimulation of CD4+ T cells from both T-bet and T-bet mice resulted in small numbers of IL-17+CD4+ T cells that were IFN-γ− (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20052222/DC1). Despite the identification of ThIL-17 as a distinct CD4+ effector T cell lineage, a proportion of IL-17+ T cells can still produce IFN-γ (30). Indeed, our MyHC-α–specific, pathogenic T-bet and T-bet CD4+ T cell lines, which produce elevated levels of IFN-γ and IL-4, respectively, both secreted significant but comparable amounts of IL-17 (Fig. 4 A). These findings suggest that although IL-17 production from MyHC-α–specific CD4+ T cells may play a role in EAM in the absence of classical Th1 and Th2 signals, T-bet does not repress the generation of such cells. Given that IL-17 promotes the infiltration of neutrophils to local sites of inflammation (36), we asked whether heart-infiltrating T cells are competent to release IL-17 in immunized mice. Surprisingly, heart-infiltrating CD3+ T cells from immunized T-bet mice made significantly more IL-17 than those taken from T-bet counterparts (Fig. 5 A). In vivo depletion of IL-17 in immunized T-bet mice markedly reduced EAM severity relative to nondepleted T-bet controls (Fig. 5 B). These data suggest that the heightened disease severity seen in T-bet mice may be explained by an increase in T cell–mediated IL-17 production in the heart.
Figure 5.

Heart-infiltrating (A) Cytokine production profile of T-bet heart-infiltrating T cells. Infiltrating CD3+ cells were isolated from the hearts of immunized T-bet (blue) or T-bet (red) mice and restimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 24 h. Production of indicated cytokines was assessed by supernatant ELISA. *, P < 0.005. A representative of two individual experiments is shown. (B) T-bet mice were immunized with 50 μg MyHC-α and injected with either 100 μg anti–mouse IL-17 or with 100 μl PBS on days 9, 12, and 15. Mice were killed on day 17. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections: bar, 200 μm.

Heart-infiltrating (A) Cytokine production profile of T-bet heart-infiltrating T cells. Infiltrating CD3+ cells were isolated from the hearts of immunized T-bet (blue) or T-bet (red) mice and restimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 24 h. Production of indicated cytokines was assessed by supernatant ELISA. *, P < 0.005. A representative of two individual experiments is shown. (B) T-bet mice were immunized with 50 μg MyHC-α and injected with either 100 μg anti–mouse IL-17 or with 100 μl PBS on days 9, 12, and 15. Mice were killed on day 17. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections: bar, 200 μm.

Normal function of T-bet BMDCs and regulatory T (T reg) cells

Peripheral CD4+ cells from T-bet – and T-bet –immunized mice produced comparable levels of IL-17 (Fig. S2 and Fig. 4). We therefore examined whether loss of T-bet in a different compartment might be responsible for the increase in EAM severity observed in T-bet mice. Because T-bet expression is up-regulated in stimulated DCs (37, 38), we first evaluated the pathogenicity of activated, MyHC-α–loaded T-bet DCs using a model of DC-induced autoimmune myocarditis (7, 39). Stimulated and MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet BMDCs were as pathogenic as T-bet BMDCs (Fig. 6 A and Table I). T-bet BMDCs produced similar amounts of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-12p40, and up-regulated MHC class II and CD80 to comparable levels, as wild-type controls upon in vitro stimulation (not depicted). Thus, in our model system of DC-induced EAM, loss of T-bet in DCs does not enhance autoimmune heart disease.
Figure 6.

(A) T-bet mice were immunized with activated, MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet or T-bet BMDCs. (B) T-bet CD4+CD25− T cells (Teff) were stimulated with anti-CD3 with or without T-bet or T-bet CD4+CD25+ cells (Treg). Proliferation was measured at 72 h by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

(A) T-bet mice were immunized with activated, MyHC-α–pulsed T-bet or T-bet BMDCs. (B) T-bet CD4+CD25− T cells (Teff) were stimulated with anti-CD3 with or without T-bet or T-bet CD4+CD25+ cells (Treg). Proliferation was measured at 72 h by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Data are representative of three independent experiments. We next examined the potential role of T-bet in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. CD4+CD25+ T reg cells suppress proliferation of CD4+CD25− effector T cells in vitro and in vivo (40). Furthermore, Afanasyeva et al. (23) recently described impaired apoptosis of CD4+CD25+ T cells in IFN-γ−/− mice using the EAM model. T-bet CD4+CD25+ T reg cells were as capable as their T-bet counterparts of suppressing the proliferation of CD4+CD25− effector cells (Fig. 6 B). This data, as well as that of others (17), indicates that loss of T-bet does not affect the suppressive function of CD4+CD25+ T reg cells in vitro.

Loss of T-bet in the CD8+ compartment exacerbates EAM

Besides CD4+ T cells, CD8+ cells are also found in the heart infiltrates of diseased mice (Fig. 2), and T-bet is expressed in CD8+ T cells (16, 20, 41). It is unclear whether CD8+ cells promote or modulate EAM pathogenesis (42, 43). A direct pathogenic role for CD8+ T cells has been shown in transgenic mice expressing a class I–restricted OVA-derived peptide specifically in cardiomyocytes (43). In nontransgenic mice, however, EAM is CD4+ T cell dependent and CD8+ T cells do not mediate disease (7). In contrast, it appears that the loss of CD8+ T cells exacerbates rather than protects against EAM as CD8-deficient mice develop exacerbated disease (42). We first examined the functional capabilities of T-bet CD8+ T cells by several methods. CD8+ T cells from immunized T-bet and T-bet mice did not respond in vitro to irradiated splenocytes pulsed with whole myosin (not depicted), excluding antigenic spreading to class I–restricted myosin epitopes as a pathogenic mechanism. Furthermore, T-bet CD8+ T cells mediated cytotoxic lysis of allogeneic targets to a similar degree as T-bet counterparts (Fig. S3 A, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20052222/DC1). IFN-γ has been shown to inhibit the generation of IL-17+ CD4+ T cells in vitro (30, 35). We therefore assessed the ability of T-bet CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-γ. In agreement with previous findings (16), we found that peripheral T-bet CD8+ T cells display apparently normal IFN-γ production upon polyclonal stimulation, regardless of whether they were taken from naive mice (Fig. S3 B) or from immunized ones (not depicted). As T-bet heart-infiltrating lymphocytes produced exacerbated IL-17, we examined IFN-γ production from T-bet and T-bet T cells isolated from the hearts of immunized mice. Intriguingly, we found that heart-infiltrating CD3+ T cells from immunized T-bet mice generated substantial amounts of IFN-γ when stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28, whereas heart infiltrating CD3+ cells from their T-bet counterparts did not (Fig. 5 A). This finding differed from the situation in the periphery: anti-CD3/anti-CD28–stimulated splenocytes from immunized T-bet mice could be induced to make IFN-γ (Fig. S3 C). Furthermore, heart-infiltrating T-bet , but not T-bet , CD8+ T cells also released IFN-γ in a TCR-independent manner when cultured in conditioned supernatants from LPS-activated BMDCs (not depicted). Importantly, CD3+CD8+, and not CD3+CD8−, T cells were the only heart-infiltrating cells capable of releasing IFN-γ in an antigen-independent manner in T-bet mice (Fig. 7 A). This finding suggests that T cell–specific production of IFN-γ in the inflamed heart is restricted to the CD8+ compartment; furthermore, this function is T-bet dependent. Of note, we found no differences in the production of the immunosuppressive cytokines TGF-β (Fig. 5 A) and IL-10 (not depicted) between heart-infiltrating T-bet and T-bet CD3+ T cells.
Figure 7.

Heart-infiltrating (A) Heart-infiltrating mononuclear cells from immunized mice were restimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28, stained for CD3, CD8, and intracellular IFN-γ, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Blue boxes and histograms, T-bet ; red boxes and histograms, T-bet . A representative of two individual experiments is shown. (B) SCID mice were reconstituted with either T-bet CD4+ plus T-bet CD8+ or T-bet CD4+ plus T-bet CD8+ and immunized. Mice were killed 21 d later. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of hearts from mice receiving T-bet CD8+ cells (right) versus mice receiving T-bet CD8+ cells (left) are shown. Bars, (top) 1 mm; (bottom) 100 μm.

Heart-infiltrating (A) Heart-infiltrating mononuclear cells from immunized mice were restimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28, stained for CD3, CD8, and intracellular IFN-γ, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Blue boxes and histograms, T-bet ; red boxes and histograms, T-bet . A representative of two individual experiments is shown. (B) SCID mice were reconstituted with either T-bet CD4+ plus T-bet CD8+ or T-bet CD4+ plus T-bet CD8+ and immunized. Mice were killed 21 d later. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of hearts from mice receiving T-bet CD8+ cells (right) versus mice receiving T-bet CD8+ cells (left) are shown. Bars, (top) 1 mm; (bottom) 100 μm. A role for tissue-resident CD8+ T cells in mediating noncognate bystander suppression has recently been described in a model of allergic airway inflammation (44). In this model, bystander suppression depended on IFN-γ production by lung resident memory CD8+ T cells. Together with the fact that IFN-γ negatively regulates autoimmune myocarditis (10, 11, 13), our findings suggest that loss of the IFN-γ–producing capacity of T-bet CD8+ T cells might play an important role in the enhanced disease severity in T-bet mice. To resolve this question in vivo, we simultaneously immunized SCID mice with the autoimmune MyHC-α peptide and reconstituted them with naive T-bet CD4+ cells plus either T-bet or T-bet naive CD8+ cells. Intriguingly, mice that received T-bet CD8+ cells developed significantly more severe disease than those receiving T-bet CD8+ cells (Fig. 7 B and Table II). One explanation for these findings could be that T-bet CD8+ T cells have a proliferative defect in vivo, thereby leading to excessive expansion of cotransferred T-bet CD4+ T cells and subsequently to exacerbated disease. To exclude this possibility, we CFSE labeled T-bet and T-bet CD8+ and transferred them to SCID mice. T-bet and T-bet CD8+ cells diluted CFSE to comparable levels upon transfer (not depicted), demonstrating that T-bet CD8+ cells proliferate normally in lymphopenic hosts. Taken with the knowledge that genetic ablation of the CD8+ T cell compartment exacerbates autoimmune myocarditis (42), our results demonstrate that CD8+ T cells display down-regulatory properties rather than disease-promoting roles in EAM, and that these suppressive functions are impaired in the absence of T-bet.
Table II.

Myocarditis prevalence and disease severity in SCID mice reconstituted with T-bet CD4+ T cells and T-bet versus T-bet CD8 T cells

RecipientReconstitutionImmunizationDisease prevalence(no. diseased/no. treated)Mean score of diseased mice
SCID T-bet +/+ CD4+ T cellsMyHC-α/CFA4/151a
T-bet +/+ CD8+ T cells
SCID T-bet +/+ CD4+ T cellsMyHC-α/CFA6/132.3a
T-bet −/− CD8+ T cells

SCID mice were reconstituted with T-bet CD4+ cells and either T-bet or T-bet CD8+ cells (2:1 ratio of CD4+/CD8+). Recipients were immunized with MyHC-α at the time of reconstitution and killed 21 d later.

P < 0.02 (Mann Whitney U).

Myocarditis prevalence and disease severity in SCID mice reconstituted with T-bet CD4+ T cells and T-bet versus T-bet CD8 T cells SCID mice were reconstituted with T-bet CD4+ cells and either T-bet or T-bet CD8+ cells (2:1 ratio of CD4+/CD8+). Recipients were immunized with MyHC-α at the time of reconstitution and killed 21 d later. P < 0.02 (Mann Whitney U). In conclusion, expression of T-bet in heart-infiltrating CD8+ T cells appears critical for their ability to mediate antigen-nonspecific bystander suppression of local inflammation in the EAM model. This observation parallels the impaired release of IFN-γ and the increased production of IL-17 from heart-infiltrating T-bet T cells.

DISCUSSION

To date, it has been unclear whether EAM is a Th1- or Th2-mediated disease. Although mice lacking IL-4 signaling could develop EAM, the same was also true for mice deficient in IFN-γ or IFN-γR (10, 11, 13). However, our data and that of others (45) indicate that Th1 responses can progress in the absence of IFN-γ signaling. We therefore examined the development of EAM in mice lacking the T-box transcription factor T-bet, which is critical for Th1 differentiation (15) and essential for CD4+ cell tissue infiltration in Th1-mediated models of inflammation (46). Our findings showed that in sharp contrast to other autoimmune disease models (17–21, 47), T-bet mice developed EAM of exacerbated severity relative to T-bet controls. Although T-bet mice were previously described to develop transiently increased disease severity relative to wild-type controls in a model of Staphylococcus aureus–induced arthritis (48), these mice also suffered from greatly increased bacterial load, making it likely that increased arthritis severity was due to impaired infectious clearance rather than to autoimmune mechanisms. We therefore describe the first model in which T-bet negatively regulates autoimmune disease. As expected, immunized T-bet mice developed defective Th1 responses, as measured by the presence of MyHC-α–specific, IgG2a isotype autoantibodies and by IFN-γ production by restimulated CD4+ T cells. We then found that T-bet IL-12p35 mice were also highly susceptible to EAM, excluding the possibility that IL-12 can promote severe Th1-driven autoimmunity in the absence of T-bet. At the same time, Th1- and Th2-polarized, MyHC-α–specific CD4+ T cell lines were equally effective in transferring disease to healthy recipients, and both T-bet IL-4 and T-bet IL-4Rα −/− mice still developed severe myocarditis. Therefore, our results describe EAM as an autoimmune disease that can develop independently of Th1/Th2 dysregulation. However, we cannot exclude that Th1 or Th2 polarization might contribute to the broad pattern of different morphologic phenotypes and clinical courses in patients with inflammatory heart disease of different causes (1, 49). Interestingly, IL-23 signaling was absolutely required for EAM development, as IL-12Rβ1 −/− and T-bet IL-12Rβ1 −/− mice, but not IL-12p35 and T-bet IL-12p35 mice, were protected from disease. IL-23 is essential for the generation of IL-17–producing CD4+ T cells in vivo, and IL-17 is a pathogenic cytokine critical for the progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (34). IL-17–producing CD4+ T cells (ThIL-17) have been described as representing an effector cell type independent from Th1 or Th2 cells (30, 35, 50). Although recent evidence argues against a role for IL-23 in the initiation of ThIL-17 differentiation (51), it is clear that IL-23 is at least essential for the expansion or survival of ThIL-17 cells in vivo. We therefore examined whether loss of T-bet could increase IL-17 production, and by extension disease severity, in our EAM model. However, both CD4+ T cells from immunized T-bet and T-bet mice, as well as in vitro–expanded and pathogenic MyHC-α–specific Th1 T-bet and Th2 T-bet CD4+ T cell lines, produced comparable levels of IL-17. This suggested that although IL-17 production might characterize pathogenic CD4+ T cells in EAM, T-bet did not repress IL-17 production in the peripheral CD4+ compartment. However, in contrast to peripheral T cells, we observed that IL-17 production from heart-infiltrating T cells was markedly greater in immunized T-bet mice as compared with T-bet controls. IL-17 can act on stromal endothelial cells in inflamed tissue to induce secretion of neutrophil-attracting factors, such as IL-8, CXCL1, and GM-CSF (36). This suggests that the heart-localized up-regulation of IL-17 production in T-bet mice could be pathologically relevant. Indeed, depletion of IL-17 in vivo markedly reduced EAM severity in T-bet mice. Recent reports have suggested that loss of T-bet results in increased IL-17 production from CD4+ T cells in vitro (30) and from restimulated draining LN cells taken from MOG peptide–immunized mice (35). Our data strongly suggest a direct pathogenic role for IL-17+CD4+ T cells in EAM. Furthermore, they establish for the first time that T-bet–mediated repression of IL-17 can modulate the severity of an autoimmune disease. IFN-γ can inhibit the production of IL-17 from CD4+ T cells. We therefore analyzed the capacity of heart-infiltrating T cells to produce IFN-γ. In T-bet mice, heart-infiltrating CD3+CD8+, but not CD3+CD8−, cells made IFN-γ upon polyclonal stimulation. Intriguingly, CD8+ T cells appear to be responsible for almost all of the IFN-γ released within the diseased heart of wild-type mice in autoimmune myocarditis. This secretion might act to suppress local production of IL-17. Furthermore, CD8+ T cells from both immunized T-bet and T-bet mice could not proliferate in response to whole myosin, suggesting that heart-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in EAM secrete IFN-γ in an antigen-nonspecific manner. Importantly, T-bet heart-infiltrating T cells were wholly deficient in their capacity to produce IFN-γ yet were still able to produce other cytokines, such as TGF-β and TNF-α. This absence of infiltrating lymphocyte-specific production of IFN-γ parallels the observed increase in IL-17 production in T-bet hearts. Although IFN-γ has been well described as the prototypical Th1 effector cytokine, it is becoming clear that it also possesses immunomodulatory properties. IFN-γ can induce APC expression of immunoregulatory molecules, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, and IFN-γ is essential for the generation of T reg cells with in vivo suppressive function (52). IFN-γ production is suppressed in arthritic joints despite significant T cell infiltration, suggesting that local down-regulation of IFN-γ production contributes to autoimmune inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (53), and IFN-γ −/− and IFN-γR −/− mice are highly susceptible to severe EAM (10, 11, 13). Bystander, noncognate CD8+-mediated production of IFN-γ has also been implicated in the suppression of inflammation; CD8+ T cells directed against an influenza-derived epitope were able to protect against OVA-mediated allergic airway inflammation (44). We found that although cotransfer of T-bet CD8+ T cells with T-bet CD4+ T cells resulted in minimal disease in immunized SCID recipients, transfer of T-bet CD8+ T cells and T-bet CD4+ T cells caused significantly more severe EAM. These findings point toward a critical T-bet–dependent role of CD8+ T cells in modulating autoimmune myocarditis severity. Our findings that organ-infiltrating but not peripheral T-bet CD8+ T cells lack the capacity to release IFN-γ complement recent findings that antigen-specific, pancreatic LN–localized T-bet CD8+ T cells lose the capacity to release IFN-γ and to mediate disease in the rat insulin promoter–lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus transgenic model of autoimmune diabetes (20). In contrast to autoimmune myocarditis, however, the transgenic autoimmune diabetes model depends on a T-bet– and IFN-γ–dependent T cell response against an MHC class I–restricted antigen. Nevertheless, it might be that the common defect in IFN-γ production by organ-infiltrating T-bet CD8+ T cells results in impaired cytotoxicity in an MHC class I–restricted immune response, yet leads to impaired bystander suppression in an MHC class II–mediated disease model. We propose that the defect of heart-infiltrating T-bet CD8+ T cells to release IFN-γ impairs their capacity to suppress local inflammation in EAM. Although we and others have found that peripheral T-bet CD8+ T cells can produce IFN-γ, the question arises as to why heart-infiltrating CD8+ cells require T-bet expression to produce IFN-γ. Peripheral TCR-transgenic T-bet CD8+ cells display defective IFN-γ production upon stimulation with specific peptide, suggesting that upon strong TCR stimulation, other factors can compensate for the loss of T-bet in driving IFN-γ (54). Recently, the transcription factor Eomes was identified as an inducer of IFN-γ in CD8+ T cells (54, 55). Although Eomes and other factors may have functions that overlap with T-bet in peripheral CD8+ cells, our data show that T-bet is clearly essential for IFN-γ production from heart-infiltrating CD8+ cells. It is possible that upon migration to the heart, CD8+ T cells undergo a process of epigenetic reprogramming that renders T-bet essential for IFN-γ generation. Alternately, heart-infiltrating CD8+ cells may arise from a subset of peripheral CD8+ T cells that absolutely require T-bet for the production of IFN-γ. Further research is required to distinguish between these and other scenarios. Clinical studies suggest that inflammation is a major factor contributing to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Here we have shown that mice lacking T-bet are highly susceptible to autoimmune myocarditis. Polymorphisms in the gene encoding T-bet as well as its promoter have been associated with differential susceptibility to asthma in human subjects (56–58). Epidemiological studies have found a significant association between idiopathic DCM and a history of asthma (59, 60), making it tempting to speculate that loss of T-bet may provide a common molecular mechanism underlying these pathologies. Intriguingly, induction of EAM appears to be independent of classical Th1 or Th2 effector responses and is rather mediated by a subset of CD4+ T cells characterized by IL-17 production. Indeed, the ablation of Th1 signaling in T-bet mice results in severe EAM, in part by the abolition of a T-bet–dependent, CD8+ T cell–mediated mechanism of inflammatory suppression. T-bet plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune diseases (17–21, 47) and has thus been proposed as a potential target of immunomodulatory therapy (61). However, the findings presented here imply that care must be taken in manipulating Th1 and Th2 responses in the treatment of autoimmune diseases so as to avoid potentially devastating side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice.

T-bet mice have been described previously (62) and were a gift from L. Glimcher (Harvard University, Boston, MA). IL-4−/−, IL-4Rα−/−, IFN-γR−/−, IL-12Rβ1−/−, IL-12p35−/−, and CB17.SCID mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. All mice were backcrossed to the BALB/c strain for >10 generations and were used at 6–8 wk of age. All experiments were conducted in accordance with Canadian, Austrian, or Swiss federal laws and institutional guidelines.

Immunization protocols.

Mice were immunized with 100 μg of the MyHC-α peptide (MyHC-α614–634) Ac-SLKLMATLFSTYASAD-OH emulsified 1:1 in PBS/CFA (1 mg/ml; H37Ra; Difco Laboratories) as described previously (63). For DC immunization, BMDCs were pulsed for 2 h with 10 μg/ml MyHC-α peptide and stimulated for another 4 h with 0.1 μg/ml LPS (O111:B4; Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 μg/ml anti-CD40 (BD Biosciences) (7). Recipient mice received 2.5 × 105 pulsed and activated BMDCs i.p. for three consecutive days and were killed 10 d after the first injection. In IL-17 depletion experiments, mice were immunized with 50 μg MyHC-α/CFA, injected with either anti–mouse IL-17 (R&D Systems) or PBS on days 9, 12, and 15, and killed on day 17.

Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and detection of autoantibodies.

Myocarditis was scored on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections using grades from 0 to 4: 0, no inflammatory infiltrates; 1, small foci of inflammatory cells between myocytes; 2, larger foci of >100 inflammatory cells; 3, >10% of a cross section involved; 4, >30% of a cross section involved (7). For immunohistochemistry, OCT (Sakura Finetek) - embedded frozen heart sections were fixed in acetone and processed for antibody staining according to standard protocols. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD4 (YTS 191), anti-CD8 (YTS 169; BD Biosciences), and anti-CD68 (FA-11; Serotec). Autoantibody responses were determined by ELISA as described previously (7) using alkaline phosphatase–labeled goat anti–mouse IgM and IgG subclass antibodies (SouthernBiotech).

T cell functions.

CD4+ and CD8+ cells were purified using magnetic beads (CD4+ and CD8+ T cell isolation kits; Miltenyi Biotec). 5–10 × 104 CD4+ T cells were restimulated for 72 h on 2 μg/ml MyHC-α peptide–pulsed, irradiated (20 Gy) syngeneic splenocytes (2 × 105). In some experiments, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were stimulated with either 1 μg/ml each of plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (BD Biosciences) or with 1 μg/ml soluble anti-CD3 on 2 × 105 irradiated syngeneic splenocytes. For T reg cell assays, CD4+ T cells were sorted into CD4+CD25− (effector T cell) and CD4+CD25+(T reg cell) populations using a high-speed cell sorter (FACSAria; BD Biosciences). 5 × 104 effector T cells were cocultured with T reg cells on 2 × 105 irradiated syngeneic splenocytes in the presence or absence of 1 μg/ml soluble anti-CD3 (BD Biosciences) for 72 h. [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured as a readout for proliferation responses. For some analyses of heart-infiltrating T cell cytokine production, cells were either stimulated in the presence of soluble anti-CD3/anti-CD28 or cultured for 72 h in supernatants from mature, LPS-stimulated BMDC cultures (conditioned medium). IFN-γ levels in conditioned medium were always below the detection limits of our ELISA kits (<50 pg/ml). Cytokine levels were measured using commercially available Quantikine ELISA kits for detection of IFN-γ, TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p40, and IL-17 (R&D Systems). For analysis of in vivo expansion, CD8+ T cells were incubated for 10 min with 10 μM CFSE (Invitrogen) at 37°C before injection.

MyHC-α–specific Th1 or Th2 CD4+ lines and adoptive transfer.

CD4+ T cells were purified from diseased T-bet or T-bet mice and cultured with irradiated (20 Gy) splenocytes at a 1:2 ratio in the presence of 2 μg/ml MyHC-α for 7 d. Cells were then washed and rested in the presence of 10 U/ml of recombinant IL-2 for an additional 7 d. This pulse/rest cycle was repeated at least three times. Finally, CD4+ T cells were restimulated for 4 d before i.p. injection of 107 CD4+ T cells per syngeneic recipient. For reconstitution of SCID mice, naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated and 5 × 106 CD4+ and 2.5 × 106 CD8+ T cells were injected i.p. into same-day immunized recipients.

FACS analysis.

Cell suspensions were stained using fluorochrome-conjugated mouse-specific antibodies against CD3, CD4, CD8α, CD8β, CD11c, CD80, MHC class II (I-Ad), CD25, IFN-γ, and IL-17. All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Before intracellular staining, cells were restimulated for 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 500 ng/ml ionomycin in the presence of 1 μg/ml GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences). Intracellular staining was conducted using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Samples were analyzed on a FACSCalibur cell sorter (BD Biosciences) using Weasel (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia) or FlowJo (TreeStar) software.

Cytotoxicity assays.

T-bet and T-bet (H-2d) BALB/c mice were primed by i.p. injection of allogeneic (H-2b) spleen-derived DCs. CD8+ T cells were isolated from primed mice using a biotinylated anti-CD8β antibody (BD Biosciences) and anti-biotin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). After in vitro restimulation on irradiated H-2b splenocytes, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells were used as effector cells in a calcein release assay using calcein-loaded EL-4 H-2b target cells. Spontaneous calcein release (SR) was determined by the addition of medium, and maximal release (MR) was determined by the addition of lysis buffer to target cells. Calcein release was measured after 2 h of incubation in a fluorescence multiwell plate reader (SpectraMax Gemini XS; Molecular Devices). Percent-specific lysis was calculated as (sample release-SR)/(MR-SR)×100%.

Isolation of heart-infiltrating cells.

Heart-infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated as described previously (64) with the following modifications: Collagenase D (Worthington Biochemical Corporation) was used at a concentration of 0.895 mg/ml, and tissue suspensions were passed sequentially through 70- and 40-μm cell strainers (BD Falcon), and finally through 15-μm self-assembled strainers (Sefar AG).

Statistics.

The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the evaluation of severity scores. Dichotomous data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Proliferation responses and cytokine levels were compared using ANOVA and Student's t test. Statistical analysis was conducted using Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software).

Online supplemental material.

Fig. S1 shows that CD4+ T cells taken from MyHC-α–immunized IFN-γR −/− mice at day 21 are capable of producing IFN-γ upon antigenic restimulation. Fig. S2 shows that a small number of CD4+ T cells from both T-bet and T-bet MyHC-α–immunized mice develop into IL-17 producers upon antigenic restimulation. Fig. S3 A shows that T-bet and T-bet CD8+ T cells can mediate cytotoxic lysis of allogeneic target cells to a comparable degree, and Fig. S3 B shows that naive peripheral T-bet and T-bet CD8+ T cells produce similar levels of IFN-γ upon polyclonal stimulation. Fig. S3 C shows that whole splenocytes from MyHC-α–immunized T-bet mice can produce significant, albeit reduced, levels of IFN-γ upon both antigenic and anti-CD3/anti-CD28 restimulation.
  62 in total

1.  T(H)-17: a giant step from T(H)1 and T(H)2.

Authors:  Thomas A Wynn
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Experimental autoimmune myocarditis in A/J mice is an interleukin-4-dependent disease with a Th2 phenotype.

Authors:  M Afanasyeva; Y Wang; Z Kaya; S Park; M J Zilliox; B H Schofield; S L Hill; N R Rose
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17.

Authors:  Heon Park; Zhaoxia Li; Xuexian O Yang; Seon Hee Chang; Roza Nurieva; Yi-Hong Wang; Ying Wang; Leroy Hood; Zhou Zhu; Qiang Tian; Chen Dong
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2005-10-02       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Understanding the IL-23-IL-17 immune pathway.

Authors:  Brent S McKenzie; Robert A Kastelein; Daniel J Cua
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 5.  T-cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis villains or accomplices?

Authors:  R W Kinne; E Palombo-Kinne; F Emmrich
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1997-04-12

6.  T-bet polymorphisms are associated with asthma and airway hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  Benjamin A Raby; Eun-Sook Hwang; Kristel Van Steen; Kelan Tantisira; Stanford Peng; Augusto Litonjua; Ross Lazarus; Cosmas Giallourakis; John D Rioux; David Sparrow; Edwin K Silverman; Laurie H Glimcher; Scott T Weiss
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Role of T-bet in commitment of TH1 cells before IL-12-dependent selection.

Authors:  A C Mullen; F A High; A S Hutchins; H W Lee; A V Villarino; D M Livingston; A L Kung; N Cereb; T P Yao; S Y Yang; S L Reiner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  TGFbeta in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells.

Authors:  Marc Veldhoen; Richard J Hocking; Christopher J Atkins; Richard M Locksley; Brigitta Stockinger
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Interferon gamma: a crucial role in the function of induced regulatory T cells in vivo.

Authors:  Kathryn J Wood; Birgit Sawitzki
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 16.687

10.  T-bet is required for optimal proinflammatory CD4+ T-cell trafficking.

Authors:  Graham M Lord; Ravi M Rao; Hyeryun Choe; Brandon M Sullivan; Andrew H Lichtman; F William Luscinskas; Laurie H Glimcher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  92 in total

1.  Susceptibility to autoimmune myocarditis is associated with intrinsic differences in CD4(+) T cells.

Authors:  P Chen; G C Baldeviano; D L Ligons; M V Talor; J G Barin; N R Rose; D Cihakova
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Attenuation of acute graft-versus-host disease in the absence of the transcription factor RORγt.

Authors:  LeShara M Fulton; Michael J Carlson; James M Coghill; Laura E Ott; Michelle L West; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari; Dan R Littman; Bruce R Blazar; Jonathan S Serody
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 is needed for sequential recruitment of T-helper 1 (Th1) and local generation of Th17 T cells in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Brown; Paul Cheresh; Zheng Zhang; Hyunji Ryu; Elizabeth Managlia; Terrence A Barrett
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.325

4.  STAT1-activating cytokines limit Th17 responses through both T-bet-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Alejandro V Villarino; Eugenio Gallo; Abul K Abbas
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Regulation and function of proinflammatory TH17 cells.

Authors:  Gustavo J Martinez; Roza I Nurieva; Xuexian O Yang; Chen Dong
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Identification of cardiac troponin I sequence motifs leading to heart failure by induction of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis.

Authors:  Ziya Kaya; Stefan Göser; Sebastian J Buss; Florian Leuschner; Renate Ottl; Jin Li; Mirko Völkers; Stefan Zittrich; Gabriele Pfitzer; Noel R Rose; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Th17 cells facilitate the humoral immune response in patients with acute viral myocarditis.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Ai-Lin Cao; Miao Yu; Qiong-Wen Lin; Xian Yu; Jing-Hui Zhang; Min Wang; He-Ping Guo; Yu-Hua Liao
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 8.  IL-17RC: a partner in IL-17 signaling and beyond.

Authors:  Allen W Ho; Sarah L Gaffen
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 9.623

9.  Interplay between effector Th17 and regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Amit Awasthi; Gopal Murugaiyan; Vijay K Kuchroo
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 10.  Cardiac troponins and autoimmunity: their role in the pathogenesis of myocarditis and of heart failure.

Authors:  Ziya Kaya; Hugo A Katus; Noel R Rose
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.