Literature DB >> 16877603

The management of failed ankle replacement.

R Kotnis1, C Pasapula, F Anwar, P H Cooke, R J Sharp.   

Abstract

Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877603     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.16768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  24 in total

1.  [Total ankle replacement for varus deformity].

Authors:  M Knupp; L Bolliger; A Barg; B Hintermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement].

Authors:  N Espinosa; S H Wirth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis].

Authors:  M D Wimmer; M Hettchen; M M Ploeger; B Hintermann; D C Wirtz; A Barg
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Complications and results of the arthrodesis after total ankle arthroplasty failure: a retrospective monocentric study of 12 cases.

Authors:  F Egrise; J Parot; C Bauer; F Galliot; M Kirsch; D Mainard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-28

7.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement : Two-stage revision with bone augmentation of osseous defects and secondary prosthesis implantation].

Authors:  A Barg; M Wiewiorski; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Cornelis Doets; Arthur W Zürcher
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Total ankle prostheses in rheumatoid arthropathy: Outcome in 52 patients followed for 1-9 years.

Authors:  Huub J L van der Heide; Bernard Schutte; Jan Willem K Louwerens; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.