Literature DB >> 16875960

Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro.

Ahad Rahim1, Sarah L Taylor, Nigel L Bush, Gail R ter Haar, Jeffrey C Bamber, Colin D Porter.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)/microbubble-mediated gene delivery is a technology with many potential advantages suited to clinical application. Previous studies have demonstrated transfection but many are unsatisfactory in respect to the exposure apparatus, lack of definition of the US field or the limitations on parameters that can be explored using clinical diagnostic US machines. We investigated individual exposure parameters using a system minimising experimental artefacts and allowing control of many parameters of the US field. Using a 1-MHz transducer we systematically varied US parameters, the duration of exposure and the microbubble and DNA concentrations to optimise gene delivery. Delivery was achieved, using lipid microbubbles (SonoVue) and clinically acceptable US exposures, to adherent cells at efficiencies of approximately 4%. The acoustic pressure amplitude (0.25 MPa peak-negative), pulse repetition frequency (1-kHz) and duration of exposure (10 s) were important in optimising gene delivery with minimal impact on cell viability. These findings support the hypothesis that varying the physical parameters of US-mediated gene delivery has an affect on both efficiency and cell viability. These data are the first in terms of their thorough exploration of the US parameter space and will be the basis for more-informed approaches to developing clinical applications of this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875960     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  39 in total

1.  Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability.

Authors:  Ji-Zhen Zhang; Jasdeep K Saggar; Zhao-Li Zhou; Bing Hu
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Efficient microbubble- and ultrasound-mediated plasmid DNA delivery into a specific rat liver lobe via a targeted injection and acoustic exposure using a novel ultrasound system.

Authors:  Shuxian Song; Misty Noble; Samuel Sun; Liping Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Carol H Miao
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction facilitates gene transfection in rat C6 glioma cells.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Wang; Chang-Jun Wu; Chun-Mei Zhang; Qian-Yi Qiu; Miao Zheng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Fan; Ronald E Kumon; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2014-04

5.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  [Summary of technical principles of contrast sonography and future perspectives].

Authors:  C Greis
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development of therapeutic microbubbles for enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery.

Authors:  Ryan R Sun; Misty L Noble; Samuel S Sun; Shuxian Song; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.