Literature DB >> 24650644

Development of therapeutic microbubbles for enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery.

Ryan R Sun1, Misty L Noble1, Samuel S Sun1, Shuxian Song1, Carol H Miao2.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-mediated gene delivery has emerged as a promising non-viral method for safe and selective gene delivery. When enhanced by the cavitation of microbubbles (MBs), US exposure can induce sonoporation that transiently increases cell membrane permeability for localized delivery of DNA. The present study explores the effect of generalizable MB customizations on MB facilitation of gene transfer compared to Definity®, a clinically available contrast agent. These modifications are 1) increased MB shell acyl chain length (RN18) for elevated stability and 2) addition of positive charge on MB (RC5K) for greater DNA associability. The MB types were compared in their ability to facilitate transfection of luciferase and GFP reporter plasmid DNA in vitro and in vivo under various conditions of US intensity, MB dosage, and pretreatment MB-DNA incubation. The results indicated that both RN18 and RC5K were more efficient than Definity®, and that the cationic RC5K can induce even greater transgene expression by increasing payload capacity with prior DNA incubation without compromising cell viability. These findings could be applied to enhance MB functions in a wide range of therapeutic US/MB gene and drug delivery approach. With further designs, MB customizations have the potential to advance this technology closer to clinical application.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic cavitation; Microbubbles; Nonviral gene transfer; Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24650644      PMCID: PMC4038297          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  48 in total

1.  Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound.

Authors:  K Tachibana; T Uchida; K Ogawa; N Yamashita; K Tamura
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Enhancement of transfection by physical concentration of DNA at the cell surface.

Authors:  D Luo; W M Saltzman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles.

Authors:  Jonathan P Christiansen; Brent A French; Alexander L Klibanov; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Contrast ultrasound targeted drug and gene delivery: an update on a new therapeutic modality.

Authors:  Richard J Price; Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.457

5.  Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  Hai-Dong Liang; Qi Long Lu; Shao-An Xue; Michael Halliwell; Tetsuya Kodama; David O Cosgrove; Hans J Stauss; Terence A Partridge; Martin J K Blomley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Augmentation of cardiac protein delivery using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction.

Authors:  Raffi Bekeredjian; Shuyuan Chen; Paul A Grayburn; Ralph V Shohet
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Enhanced transfection efficiency into macrophages and dendritic cells by a combination method using mannosylated lipoplexes and bubble liposomes with ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Keita Un; Shigeru Kawakami; Ryo Suzuki; Kazuo Maruyama; Fumiyoshi Yamashita; Mitsuru Hashida
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  Optimization of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer: comparison of contrast agents and ultrasound modalities.

Authors:  Sorin V Pislaru; Cristina Pislaru; Randall R Kinnick; Ripudamanjit Singh; Rajiv Gulati; James F Greenleaf; Robert D Simari
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Y Taniyama; K Tachibana; K Hiraoka; M Aoki; S Yamamoto; K Matsumoto; T Nakamura; T Ogihara; Y Kaneda; R Morishita
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  An efficient gene transfer method mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney.

Authors:  Hiromi Koike; Naruya Tomita; Haruhito Azuma; Yoshiaki Taniyama; Keita Yamasaki; Yasuo Kunugiza; Katsuro Tachibana; Toshio Ogihara; Ryuichi Morishita
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.565

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.

Authors:  Hangyu Lin; Junfang Chen; Chuanpin Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Use of Theranostic Strategies in Myocardial Cavitation-Enabled Therapy.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Chunyan Dou; Xiaofang Lu; Yiying I Zhu; Mario L Fabiilli; Gabe E Owens; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain.

Authors:  James-Kevin Y Tan; Binhan Pham; Yujin Zong; Camilo Perez; Don O Maris; Ashton Hemphill; Carol H Miao; Thomas J Matula; Pierre D Mourad; Hua Wei; Drew L Sellers; Philip J Horner; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Prolonging pulse duration in ultrasound-mediated gene delivery lowers acoustic pressure threshold for efficient gene transfer to cells and small animals.

Authors:  Dominic M Tran; James Harrang; Shuxian Song; Jeremy Chen; Bryn M Smith; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Sequential release of nanoparticle payloads from ultrasonically burstable capsules.

Authors:  Stephen Kennedy; Jennifer Hu; Cathal Kearney; Hadas Skaat; Luo Gu; Marco Gentili; Herman Vandenburgh; David Mooney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Spatial and Temporal Control of Cavitation Allows High In Vitro Transfection Efficiency in the Absence of Transfection Reagents or Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Kamel Chettab; Stéphanie Roux; Doriane Mathé; Emeline Cros-Perrial; Maxime Lafond; Cyril Lafon; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Louis Mestas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Nathan S S Atkinson; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 8.  Functional micro/nanobubbles for ultrasound medicine and visualizable guidance.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Yihong Li; Zhe Liu; Xinyong Ma; Wenxin He; Chenxi Liu
Journal:  Sci China Chem       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 9.445

Review 9.  Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery.

Authors:  Vera Paefgen; Dennis Doleschel; Fabian Kiessling
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Activation of dormant secondary metabolite production by introducing neomycin resistance into the deep-sea fungus, Aspergillus versicolor ZBY-3.

Authors:  Yuan Dong; Cheng-Bin Cui; Chang-Wei Li; Wei Hua; Chang-Jing Wu; Tian-Jiao Zhu; Qian-Qun Gu
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.