OBJECTIVE: Low bone mass often leads to osteoporosis and increased risk of bone fractures. Soda consumption may contribute to imbalances that lead to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and general bone health. We examined the relationship between soda consumption and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal American-Indian women, an at-risk population because of nutritional and other lifestyle-related factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using logistic regression to examine associations between soda consumption and osteoporosis, and linear regression to examine the association between soda consumption and BMD, with and without adjustment for demographic and lifestyle factors. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel was performed to estimate BMD (g/cm2). SETTING: American-Indian communities in the Northern Plains and Southwestern USA. SUBJECTS: A total of 438 postmenopausal American-Indian women. RESULTS: Women with osteoporosis were significantly older and had lower BMI, average daily soda intakes, BMD levels and use of hormones than women without osteoporosis (P < 0·05). Soda consumption was not associated with increased odds of osteoporosis in either unadjusted or adjusted models (P > 0·05), although age (increased), BMI (decreased) and past hormone use (decreased) were all significantly associated with osteoporosis risk (P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the present study did not find associations between soda consumption and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal American-Indian women, analyses did confirm confounding between soda consumption and age and BMI. This suggests that any potential effects of soda consumption on bone health are largely mediated through these factors.
OBJECTIVE: Low bone mass often leads to osteoporosis and increased risk of bone fractures. Soda consumption may contribute to imbalances that lead to decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and general bone health. We examined the relationship between soda consumption and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal American-Indian women, an at-risk population because of nutritional and other lifestyle-related factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using logistic regression to examine associations between soda consumption and osteoporosis, and linear regression to examine the association between soda consumption and BMD, with and without adjustment for demographic and lifestyle factors. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel was performed to estimate BMD (g/cm2). SETTING: American-Indian communities in the Northern Plains and Southwestern USA. SUBJECTS: A total of 438 postmenopausal American-Indian women. RESULTS:Women with osteoporosis were significantly older and had lower BMI, average daily soda intakes, BMD levels and use of hormones than women without osteoporosis (P < 0·05). Soda consumption was not associated with increased odds of osteoporosis in either unadjusted or adjusted models (P > 0·05), although age (increased), BMI (decreased) and past hormone use (decreased) were all significantly associated with osteoporosis risk (P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the present study did not find associations between soda consumption and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal American-Indian women, analyses did confirm confounding between soda consumption and age and BMI. This suggests that any potential effects of soda consumption on bone health are largely mediated through these factors.
Authors: F B Hu; E Rimm; S A Smith-Warner; D Feskanich; M J Stampfer; A Ascherio; L Sampson; W C Willett Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: E Mazariegos-Ramos; F Guerrero-Romero; M Rodríguez-Morán; G Lazcano-Burciaga; R Paniagua; D Amato Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Gladys Barrera; Daniel Bunout; Vivien Gattás; María Pía de la Maza; Laura Leiva; Sandra Hirsch Journal: Nutrition Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: C McGartland; P J Robson; L Murray; G Cran; M J Savage; D Watkins; M Rooney; C Boreham Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: M L Slattery; M C Schumacher; A P Lanier; S Edwards; R Edwards; M A Murtaugh; J Sandidge; G E Day; D Kaufman; S Kanekar; L Tom-Orme; J A Henderson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 4.897