Literature DB >> 16875236

Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance.

Lisa Davidson1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging of the tongue is increasingly common in speech production research. However, there has been little standardization regarding the quantification and statistical analysis of ultrasound data. In linguistic studies, researchers may want to determine whether the tongue shape for an articulation under two different conditions (e.g., consonants in word-final versus word-medial position) is the same or different. This paper demonstrates how the smoothing spline ANOVA (SS ANOVA) can be applied to the comparison of tongue curves [Gu, Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models (Springer, New York, 2002)]. The SS ANOVA is a technique for determining whether or not there are significant differences between the smoothing splines that are the best fits for two data sets being compared. If the interaction term of the SS ANOVA model is statistically significant, then the groups have different shapes. Since the interaction may be significant even if only a small section of the curves are different (i.e., the tongue root is the same, but the tip of one group is raised), Bayesian confidence intervals are used to determine which sections of the curves are statistically different. SS ANOVAs are illustrated with some data comparing obstruents produced in word-final and word-medial coda position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875236     DOI: 10.1121/1.2205133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy.

Authors:  Alison G Bruderer; D Kyle Danielson; Padmapriya Kandhadai; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Pitch planning in English and Taiwanese Mandarin: evidence from startle-elicited responses.

Authors:  Chenhao Chiu; Bryan Gick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Patricia McCabe; Mark Tiede; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Sibilant Fricative Merging in Taiwan Mandarin: An Investigation of Tongue Postures using Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Chenhao Chiu; Po-Chun Wei; Masaki Noguchi; Noriko Yamane
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Liquid coarticulation in child and adult speech.

Authors:  Phil J Howson; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  Proc Int Congr Phon Sci       Date:  2019-08

7.  Methods for quantifying tongue shape and complexity using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Katherine M Dawson; Mark K Tiede; D H Whalen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  The Acquisition of Articulatory Timing for Liquids: Evidence From Child and Adult Speech.

Authors:  Phil J Howson; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Visual Speech Perception Cues Constrain Patterns of Articulatory Variation and Sound Change.

Authors:  Jonathan Havenhill; Youngah Do
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  What anticipatory coarticulation in children tells us about speech motor control maturity.

Authors:  Guillaume Barbier; Pascal Perrier; Yohan Payan; Mark K Tiede; Silvain Gerber; Joseph S Perkell; Lucie Ménard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.