Literature DB >> 16871945

Decreased nasal mucosal sensitivity in older subjects.

Bozena B Wrobel1, Alexander G Bien, Eric H Holbrook, George E Meyer, Neil A Bratney, Jane Meza, Donald A Leopold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of the human nasal cavity mucosa to touch is not well understood. The site of receptors and mode of action responsible for the sensation of the nasal airflow is a topic of controversy. Previous studies have suggested that the skin-lined nasal vestibule is more sensitive to airflow than the mucosa of the nasal cavity. A possible decline in nasal sensitivity to airflow in older subjects has not been studied.
METHODS: The threshold of the mucosal sensitivity to jets of air was assessed in 76 subjects with healthy nasal cavities. A total of 141 nostrils were tested, 67 in younger patients and 74 in older patients.
RESULTS: Statistically significant (p < 0.001) increases in thresholds were found for all points tested for older patients compared with the younger patients. In general, the more sensitive locations were in the nasal vestibule. The nasal cavity mucosa in the inferior meatus was slightly more sensitive than the middle meatus.
CONCLUSION: We have measured the threshold to touch (air jet sensitivity) in nine places in each of 141 nasal cavities and determined that the variability and sensitivity of these measurements among people varies by age and the distance from the nostril. Older subjects were found to have a higher threshold for the sensation of airflow, and the nasal vestibule was found to be more sensitive than the rest of the nasal cavity mucosa with the inferior meatus slightly more sensitive then the middle meatus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871945     DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol        ISSN: 1050-6586


  10 in total

Review 1.  Rhinitis sicca, dry nose and atrophic rhinitis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tanja Hildenbrand; Rainer K Weber; Detlef Brehmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Alexander A Farag; James Leach; Bhakthi Deshpande; Adam Jacobowitz; Kanghyun Kim; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Investigation of the abnormal nasal aerodynamics and trigeminal functions among empty nose syndrome patients.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Alexander A Farag; Guillermo Maza; Sam McGhee; Michael A Ciccone; Bhakthi Deshpande; Edmund A Pribitkin; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Perception of better nasal patency correlates with increased mucosal cooling after surgery for nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Corbin D Sullivan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis of aggressive turbinate reductions: is it a culprit of empty nose syndrome?

Authors:  Jennifer Malik; Chengyu Li; Guillermo Maza; Alexander A Farag; Jillian P Krebs; Sam McGhee; Gabriela Zappitelli; Bhakthi Deshpande; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Acellular dermal (alloderm) grafts versus silastic sheets implants for management of empty nose syndrome.

Authors:  Magdy Eisa Saafan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Kara Blacker; Brian Lyman; Pamela Dalton; Beverly J Cowart; Edmund A Pribitkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Turbinate reduction with complete preservation of mucosa and submucosa during rhinoplasty.

Authors:  M Rudes; F Schwan; F Klass; H G Gassner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Kara Blacker; Yuehao Luo; Bruce Bryant; Jianbo Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Numerical simulation of airflow fields in two typical nasal structures of empty nose syndrome: a computational fluid dynamics study.

Authors:  Meng-Yang Di; Zhe Jiang; Zhi-Qiang Gao; Zhi Li; Yi-Ran An; Wei Lv
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.