Literature DB >> 16871437

Intraoperative peripherally inserted central venous catheter central venous pressure monitoring in abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction.

Elisabeth C McLemore1, Deron J Tessier, Mohamed Y Rady, Joel S Larson, Jeff T Mueller, William M Stone, Richard J Fowl, Bhavesh M Patel.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have found no clinically significant benefit to the perioperative use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs), and peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) have been reported to measure central venous pressure (CVP) accurately. The objective of this study was to determine whether the dynamic shifts in preload associated with elective reconstruction of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are accurately reflected by CVP measurements from open-ended PICCs compared to CVP measurements from concomitant indwelling PACs. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PICCs and PACs were placed preoperatively in five patients undergoing elective AAA reconstruction. CVP measurements were recorded every 15 min during the operation. Bland-Altman statistical analysis was used to determine the degree of agreement in data collected by the two measurement devices. Seventy-three paired measurements of CVP from concomitant indwelling PICCs and PACs obtained from five patients undergoing elective AAA reconstruction revealed PICC measurements to be higher than PAC measurements by 0.6 mm Hg (overall correlation coefficient 0.92). The difference between the two measurement devices was expected to be <3.4 mm Hg at least 95% of the time. The findings of this pilot study indicate that PICCs are an effective method for CVP monitoring in situations of dynamic systemic compliance and preload, such as those observed during elective AAA reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16871437     DOI: 10.1007/s10016-006-9108-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

1.  Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Scott T Rawson; Timothy T Dwyer; Chirag C Patel; Jo A Wick; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  An in vitro study comparing a peripherally inserted central catheter to a conventional central venous catheter: no difference in static and dynamic pressure transmission.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Timothy T Dwyer; Bethene L Gregg; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Comparison of the central venous pressure from internal jugular vein and the pressure measured from the peripherally inserted antecubital central catheter (PICCP) in liver transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Jung-Yeon Yun; So-Hee Park; Dae-Soon Cho; Hae-Jeung Jeung; Soon-Ae Lee; So Jin Seo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study.

Authors:  Sonia D'Arrigo; Claudio Sandroni; Sofia Cacciola; Antonio Maria Dell'Anna; Mauro Pittiruti; Maria Giuseppina Annetta; Cesare Colosimo; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.925

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.