AIMS: Identification of risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) occurrence in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is reasonable, because ICD patients with multiple risk factors might benefit from more aggressive anti-arrhythmic therapy for the prevention of arrhythmic events. Furthermore, in the era of prophylactic ICD therapy and limited healthcare resources, additional markers are needed for improved patient selection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thus, in Prospective Analysis of Risk Factor for Appropriate ICD Therapy (PROFIT), we prospectively analyzed the role of ejection fraction (EF), N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, atrial fibrillation, and QRS-duration as independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence in 250 ICD patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that EF<40% (log-rank P=0.001), NT-proBNP levels higher than median (>or=405 ng/L; log-rank P=0.04), QRS-duration >or=150 ms (log-rank P=0.016), permanent atrial fibrillation (log-rank P=0.008), and higher NYHA class (log-rank P=0.029) were associated with VT/VF occurrence. By multivariate Cox regression analysis EF, QRS-duration and atrial fibrillation remained significantly associated with appropriate VT/VF therapy, whereas there was no relationship among NT-proBNP, NYHA class, and VT/VF occurrence. Stratifying patients according to the number of their independent risk factors (EF<40%, AF, QRS-width>or=150 ms) showed that patients with greater than or equal to two risk factors had a 100% 2-year risk of VT/VF occurrence, whereas patients with no or one risk factor had a 19.3 and 25% 2-year risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EF<40%, permanent atrial fibrillation, and QRS>or=150 ms are independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence in predominantly secondary prophylactic ICD patients. Combining all independent predictors, we developed a risk score for VT/VF occurrence identifying a subgroup of patients with two or more risk factors who had a 100% 2-year risk. Future studies will reveal if this risk score helps to identify ICD patients suitable for empirical anti-arrhythmic therapy and to improve patient selection for prophylactic ICD therapy.
AIMS: Identification of risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) occurrence in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is reasonable, because ICDpatients with multiple risk factors might benefit from more aggressive anti-arrhythmic therapy for the prevention of arrhythmic events. Furthermore, in the era of prophylactic ICD therapy and limited healthcare resources, additional markers are needed for improved patient selection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thus, in Prospective Analysis of Risk Factor for Appropriate ICD Therapy (PROFIT), we prospectively analyzed the role of ejection fraction (EF), N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, atrial fibrillation, and QRS-duration as independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence in 250 ICDpatients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that EF<40% (log-rank P=0.001), NT-proBNP levels higher than median (>or=405 ng/L; log-rank P=0.04), QRS-duration >or=150 ms (log-rank P=0.016), permanent atrial fibrillation (log-rank P=0.008), and higher NYHA class (log-rank P=0.029) were associated with VT/VF occurrence. By multivariate Cox regression analysis EF, QRS-duration and atrial fibrillation remained significantly associated with appropriate VT/VF therapy, whereas there was no relationship among NT-proBNP, NYHA class, and VT/VF occurrence. Stratifying patients according to the number of their independent risk factors (EF<40%, AF, QRS-width>or=150 ms) showed that patients with greater than or equal to two risk factors had a 100% 2-year risk of VT/VF occurrence, whereas patients with no or one risk factor had a 19.3 and 25% 2-year risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EF<40%, permanent atrial fibrillation, and QRS>or=150 ms are independent predictors for VT/VF occurrence in predominantly secondary prophylactic ICDpatients. Combining all independent predictors, we developed a risk score for VT/VF occurrence identifying a subgroup of patients with two or more risk factors who had a 100% 2-year risk. Future studies will reveal if this risk score helps to identify ICDpatients suitable for empirical anti-arrhythmic therapy and to improve patient selection for prophylactic ICD therapy.
Authors: T Deneke; T Lawo; J Reinecke; C Buttler; P H Grewe; D-I Shin; B Gerritse; A Mügge; B Lemke; A Kloppe Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2011-12
Authors: Wolfgang Dichtl; Thomas Wolber; Ursula Paoli; Thomas Theurl; Simon Brüllmann; Markus Stühlinger; Thomas Berger; Karin Spuller; Alexander Strasak; Otmar Pachinger; Laurent Haegeli; Firat Duru; Florian Hintringer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Ritesh Dhar; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; N A Mark Estes; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; James P Daubert; Henry Greenberg; Robert B Case; David M Kent Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-02-16 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Firas J Al Badarin; Alan P Wimmer; Kevin F Kennedy; Arnold F Jacobson; Timothy M Bateman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Teresa Strisciuglio; Giuseppe Ammirati; Valerio Pergola; Lucio Addeo; Maria Angela Losi; Aniello Viggiano; Livio Imparato; Vincenzo Russo; Enrico Melillo; Gerardo Nigro; Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio D'Onofrio; Giovanni Esposito; Antonio Rapacciuolo Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Hanno Oswald; Benjamin Husemann; Ajmal Gardiwal; Christoph Lissel; Maximilian A Pichlmaier; Ulrich Luesebrink; Thorben Koenig; Gunnar Klein Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2009-03-15