BACKGROUND: Elevated γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a new risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but its impact on ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurrence and survival in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Considering that GGT levels are gender-dependent, female ICD recipients were excluded from our database because of the low incidence of events. In a retrospective analysis, appropriate ICD therapy (both shocks and antitachycardia pacing due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias) occurred in 31.9% of 320 male patients who had received an ICD for primary prevention (median follow-up of 2.3 years), and in 55.1% of 423 male patients who had received an ICD for secondary prevention (median follow-up of 3.9 years). Compared to normal low GGT plasma levels (below 28 U/L), total mortality but not risk for appropriate ICD therapy was elevated for higher GGT categories (p for trend = 0.004 in primary prevention and p for trend = 0.002 in secondary prevention, respectively). In Cox regression analysis, elevated GGT (>56 U/L) remained an independent predictor of death both in primary (p = 0.011) and in secondary prevention (p = 0.006). Patients with elevated GGT and renal insufficiency defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) suffered from excess total mortality jeopardizing the benefit of ICD therapy. CONCLUSION: Elevation of GGT is an important adverse prognostic parameter in ICD patients. A possible role of GGT for improved patient selection for ICD therapy deserves further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Elevated γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a new risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but its impact on ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurrence and survival in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Considering that GGT levels are gender-dependent, female ICD recipients were excluded from our database because of the low incidence of events. In a retrospective analysis, appropriate ICD therapy (both shocks and antitachycardia pacing due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias) occurred in 31.9% of 320 male patients who had received an ICD for primary prevention (median follow-up of 2.3 years), and in 55.1% of 423 male patients who had received an ICD for secondary prevention (median follow-up of 3.9 years). Compared to normal low GGT plasma levels (below 28 U/L), total mortality but not risk for appropriate ICD therapy was elevated for higher GGT categories (p for trend = 0.004 in primary prevention and p for trend = 0.002 in secondary prevention, respectively). In Cox regression analysis, elevated GGT (>56 U/L) remained an independent predictor of death both in primary (p = 0.011) and in secondary prevention (p = 0.006). Patients with elevated GGT and renal insufficiency defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) suffered from excess total mortality jeopardizing the benefit of ICD therapy. CONCLUSION: Elevation of GGT is an important adverse prognostic parameter in ICDpatients. A possible role of GGT for improved patient selection for ICD therapy deserves further investigation.
Authors: Ilan Goldenberg; Anant K Vyas; W Jackson Hall; Arthur J Moss; Hongyue Wang; Hua He; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Mark L Andrews Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wolfgang Dichtl; Wolfgang Vogel; Karin M Dunst; Wilhelm Grander; Hannes F Alber; Matthias Frick; Herwig Antretter; Günther Laufer; Otmar Pachinger; Gerhard Pölzl Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Heather Bloom; Brian Heeke; Angel Leon; Fernando Mera; David Delurgio; John Beshai; Jonathan Langberg Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Johannes Blumer; Thomas Wolber; Jens Hellermann; Johannes Holzmeister; Christian Binggeli; Firat Duru; Corinna Brunckhorst Journal: Int Heart J Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Leonard Bergau; Tobias Tichelbäcker; Barbora Kessel; Lars Lüthje; Thomas H Fischer; Tim Friede; Markus Zabel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240