BACKGROUND: There is conflicting literature on the relationship between prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) and arrhythmic events, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), in heart failure patients with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of prolonged QRSd relative to arrhythmic outcomes in medically and ICD-treated patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II. METHODS: Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for ejection fraction, heart failure class, and blood urea nitrogen, we estimated the association of prolonged QRSd >/=140 ms with SCD in the medically treated arm and SCD or first appropriate ICD therapy for rapid ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF; cycle length </=260 ms) in the ICD-treated arm. RESULTS: In the medically treated arm, prolonged QRSd was a significant independent predictor of SCD (hazard ratio 2.12; 95% confidence interval 1.20-3.76; P = .01). However, in the ICD-treated arm, prolonged QRSd did not predict SCD or rapid VT/VF (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.47-1.24; P = .28). The difference in the prognostic effect of prolonged QRSd in these two groups was significant (P<.01). These results were not affected by varying the cycle length that defines rapid VT/VF or the duration that defines QRSd prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and EF </=30%, prolonged QRSd does not predict SCD/VT/VF in ICD-treated patients but does predict SCD in medically treated patients. This underscores the nonequivalence of VT/VF and SCD and the need for caution in inferring risk of SCD when using nonrandomized databases that include only patients with ICDs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is conflicting literature on the relationship between prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) and arrhythmic events, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), in heart failurepatients with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of prolonged QRSd relative to arrhythmic outcomes in medically and ICD-treated patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II. METHODS: Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for ejection fraction, heart failure class, and blood ureanitrogen, we estimated the association of prolonged QRSd >/=140 ms with SCD in the medically treated arm and SCD or first appropriate ICD therapy for rapid ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF; cycle length </=260 ms) in the ICD-treated arm. RESULTS: In the medically treated arm, prolonged QRSd was a significant independent predictor of SCD (hazard ratio 2.12; 95% confidence interval 1.20-3.76; P = .01). However, in the ICD-treated arm, prolonged QRSd did not predict SCD or rapid VT/VF (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.47-1.24; P = .28). The difference in the prognostic effect of prolonged QRSd in these two groups was significant (P<.01). These results were not affected by varying the cycle length that defines rapid VT/VF or the duration that defines QRSd prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and EF </=30%, prolonged QRSd does not predict SCD/VT/VF in ICD-treated patients but does predict SCD in medically treated patients. This underscores the nonequivalence of VT/VF and SCD and the need for caution in inferring risk of SCD when using nonrandomized databases that include only patients with ICDs.
Authors: B J Maron; W K Shen; M S Link; A E Epstein; A K Almquist; J P Daubert; G H Bardy; S Favale; R F Rea; G Boriani; N A Estes; P Spirito Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amit B Guttigoli; Brian F Wilner; Kenneth M Stein; Steven M Markowitz; Sei Iwai; Bindi K Shah; Ravi K Yarlagadda; Bruce B Lerman; Suneet Mittal Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D Böcker; D Bänsch; A Heinecke; M Weber; J Brunn; D Hammel; M Borggrefe; G Breithardt; M Block Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-10-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Domenico Corrado; Loira Leoni; Mark S Link; Paolo Della Bella; Fiorenzo Gaita; Antonio Curnis; Jorge Uriarte Salerno; Diran Igidbashian; Antonio Raviele; Marcello Disertori; Gabriele Zanotto; Roberto Verlato; Giuseppe Vergara; Pietro Delise; Pietro Turrini; Cristina Basso; Franco Naccarella; Francesco Maddalena; N A Mark Estes; Gianfranco Buja; Gaetano Thiene Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark T Kearney; Azfar Zaman; Dwain L Eckberg; Amanda J Lee; Keith A A Fox; Ajay M Shah; Robin J Prescott; William E Shell; Elizabeth Charuvastra; Timothy S Callahan; W Paul Brooksby; D Justin Wright; Nicholas P Gall; James Nolan Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Peter J Zimetbaum; Alfred E Buxton; William Batsford; John D Fisher; Gail E Hafley; Kerry L Lee; Michael F O'Toole; Richard L Page; Matthew Reynolds; Mark E Josephson Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Henry Greenberg; Robert B Case; Arthur J Moss; Mary W Brown; Elizabeth R Carroll; Mark L Andrews Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-04-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alfred E Buxton; Kerry L Lee; Gail E Hafley; Luis A Pires; John D Fisher; Michael R Gold; Mark E Josephson; Michael H Lehmann; Eric N Prystowsky Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Tor Biering-Sørensen; Muammar Kabir; Jonathan W Waks; Jason Thomas; Wendy S Post; Elsayed Z Soliman; Alfred E Buxton; Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-03
Authors: Larisa G Tereshchenko; Lichy Han; Alan Cheng; Joseph E Marine; David D Spragg; Sunil Sinha; Darshan Dalal; Hugh Calkins; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Barry J Fetics; Joseph E Marine; David D Spragg; Sunil Sinha; Hugh Calkins; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Jonathan P Piccini; Sana M Al-Khatib; Anne S Hellkamp; Kevin J Anstrom; Jeanne E Poole; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Seth R Bender; Daniel J Friedman; Steven M Markowitz; Bruce B Lerman; Peter M Okin Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Darwin Jeyaraj; Xiaoping Wan; Eckhard Ficker; Julian E Stelzer; Isabelle Deschenes; Haiyan Liu; Lance D Wilson; Keith F Decker; Tamer H Said; Mukesh K Jain; Yoram Rudy; David S Rosenbaum Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 4.733