Literature DB >> 16858671

Comparison of errors associated with single- and multi-bolus injection protocols in low-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced tracer kinetic analysis.

Caleb Roberts1, David L Buckley, Geoff J M Parker.   

Abstract

Accurate sampling of the arterial input function (AIF) in low-temporal-resolution quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies is crucial for accurate and reproducible parameter estimation. However, when conventional AIFs are sampled at low temporal resolution, they introduce an unpredictable degree of error. An alternative double contrast agent (CA) bolus injection protocol designed to compensate for temporal mis-sampling of the AIF and tissue uptake curve was simulated in addition to a commonly used single CA bolus injection protocol. A range of tissue uptake curves for each AIF form were generated using a distributed parameter model, and Monte Carlo simulation studies were performed over a range of offset times (to mimic temporal mis-sampling), temporal resolutions and SNR in order to compare the performance of both AIF forms in compartmental modeling. Insufficient data sampling of the single bolus AIF at temporal resolutions in excess of 9 s leads to large errors, which can be reduced by employing an additional, appropriately administered, second CA bolus injection. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858671     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  11 in total

1.  Incorporating the effects of transcytolemmal water exchange in a reference region model for DCE-MRI analysis: theory, simulations, and experimental results.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Jeffrey J Luci; Laura M DeBusk; P Charles Lin; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Blood-brain barrier imaging in human neuropathologies.

Authors:  Ronel Veksler; Ilan Shelef; Alon Friedman
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 3.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer.

Authors:  Michael Ingrisch; Steven Sourbron
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis.

Authors:  Greg O Cron; Claire Foottit; Thomas E Yankeelov; Leonard I Avruch; Mark E Schweitzer; Ian Cameron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Use of cardiac output to improve measurement of input function in quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Louisa Bokacheva; Qun Chen; Pippa Storey; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Functional MRI of the kidneys.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Feasibility of using limited-population-based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data.

Authors:  Ya Wang; Wei Huang; David M Panicek; Lawrence H Schwartz; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Melanie Freed; Kerryanne Winters; Sungheon G Kim
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  DCE-MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma-clinical and therapeutic image biomarker.

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Temporal sampling requirements for reference region modeling of DCE-MRI data in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine R Planey; E Brian Welch; Lei Xu; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; J Christopher Gatenby; Darla Freehardt; Ingrid Mayer; Ingrid Meszeoly; Mark Kelley; Julie Means-Powell; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.