Literature DB >> 16858619

Paternal occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Geir Mjøen1, Dag Ottar Saetre, Rolv T Lie, Tore Tynes, Karl Gerhard Blaasaas, Merete Hannevik, Lorentz M Irgens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the last decades, public concern that radiofrequency radiation (RFR) may be related to adverse reproductive outcomes has been emerging. Our objective was to assess associations between paternal occupational exposure to RFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes including birth defects using population-based data from Norway.
METHODS: Data on reproductive outcomes derived from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway were linked with data on paternal occupation derived from the general population censuses. An expert panel categorized occupations according to exposure. Using logistic regression, we analyzed 24 categories of birth defects as well as other adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: In the offspring of fathers most likely to have been exposed, increased risk was observed for preterm birth (odds ratio (OR): 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03, 1.15). In this group we also observed a decreased risk of cleft lip (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.97). In the medium exposed group, we observed increased risk for a category of "other defects" (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.22, 4.70), and a decreased risk for a category of "other syndromes" (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.99) and upper gastrointestinal defects (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.93).
CONCLUSION: The study is partly reassuring for occupationally exposed fathers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858619     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9030-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  30 in total

1.  Reproductive function in relation to duty assignments among military personnel.

Authors:  S M Schrader; R E Langford; T W Turner; M J Breitenstein; J C Clark; B L Jenkins; D O Lundy; S D Simon; T B Weyandt
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Is job title an adequate surrogate to measure magnetic field exposure?

Authors:  B Floderus
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Confronting the prenatal effects of active and passive tobacco smoking on the birth weight of children.

Authors:  W Jedrychowski; E Flak
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.163

4.  Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  M I Schmidt; B B Duncan; A J Reichelt; L Branchtein; M C Matos; A Costa e Forti; E R Spichler; J M Pousada; M M Teixeira; T Yamashita
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Teratogen update: electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  E Robert
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1996-12

6.  Survival and reproduction among males with birth defects and risk of recurrence in their children.

Authors:  R T Lie; A J Wilcox; R Skjaerven
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Smoking in Dutch pregnant women and birth weight.

Authors:  H P Adriaanse; J A Knottnerus; L R Delgado; H H Cox; G G Essed
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-06

8.  Paternal occupation and risk of birth defects in offspring.

Authors:  P G Schnitzer; A F Olshan; J D Erickson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  A critical review of epidemiologic studies of radiofrequency exposure and human cancers.

Authors:  J M Elwood
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure.

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; Adele Green; Leeka Kheifets; David Savitz; Anthony Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of paternal electromagnetic pulse exposure on the reproductive endocrine function of male offspring: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ming-Juan Yang; Hai-Yang Lang; Xia Miao; Hai-Qiang Liu; Yan-Jun Zhang; Ya-Feng Wang; Yong-Bin Chen; Jun-Ye Liu; Li-Hua Zeng; Guo-Zhen Guo
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Paternal factors associated with neonatal deaths and births with low weight: evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2006-2007.

Authors:  Rubeena Zakar; Muhammad Zakria Zakar; Nauman Aqil; Muazzam Nasrullah
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

3.  Development of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Assessment of Occupational Exposure to High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (3 kHz-300 GHz).

Authors:  Lucile Migault; Joseph D Bowman; Hans Kromhout; Jordi Figuerola; Isabelle Baldi; Ghislaine Bouvier; Michelle C Turner; Elisabeth Cardis; Javier Vila
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Paternal Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Causes Sex-Specific Differences in Body Weight Trajectory and Glucose Metabolism in Offspring Mice.

Authors:  Song Yan; Ying Ju; Jie Dong; Hui Lei; Jun Wang; Qian Xu; Yefei Ma; Jingjing Wang; Xiaohong Wang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  Valborg Baste; Trond Riise; Bente E Moen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Major birth defects in the Brazilian side of the triple border: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Suzana de Souza; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Cezar Rangel Pestana
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  Study of congenital malformations among the progeny of the personnel of an interforce military shooting range in Sardinia, Italy.

Authors:  Giannina Satta; Michela Ursi; Claudia Pili; Marcello Campagna; Pierluigi Cocco
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.275

8.  Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth? A systematic review.

Authors:  Metrecia L Terrell; Kathleen P Hartnett; Michele Marcus
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2011-04-20

Review 9.  Preconception Care: A New Standard of Care within Maternal Health Services.

Authors:  Stephen J Genuis; Rebecca A Genuis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Mapping the past, present and future research landscape of paternal effects.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Malgorzata Lagisz; Russell Bonduriansky; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 7.431

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.