Literature DB >> 9717697

Reproductive function in relation to duty assignments among military personnel.

S M Schrader1, R E Langford, T W Turner, M J Breitenstein, J C Clark, B L Jenkins, D O Lundy, S D Simon, T B Weyandt.   

Abstract

As a follow-up to the pilot study of semen quality of soldiers with various military assignments a larger, more complete study was conducted. Soldiers were recruited at Fort Hood, Texas. Thirty-three men were exposed to radar as part of their duty assignment in the Signal Corps, 57 men were involved with firing the 155 mm howitzer (potential lead exposure), and 103 soldiers had neither lead nor radar exposure and served as the comparison control group. Both serum and urinary follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone and serum, salivary, and urine testosterone levels were determined in all men. A complete semen analysis was conducted on each soldier. For statistical analysis, the primary study variables were: sperm concentration, sperm/ejaculate, semen volume, percent normal morphology, percent motile, percent viable (both vital stain and hypoosmotic swelling), curvilinear velocity, straight-line velocity, linearity, sperm head length, width, area, and perimeter. Variables were adjusted for significant confounders (e.g., abstinence, sample age, race). No statistical differences (P < 0.05) were observed in any measurement. While these results are in agreement with two previous studies assessing soldiers firing the 155-mm howitzer, they contradict our previous report indicating that radar exposure caused a significant decrease in sperm numbers. A possible explanation is that the radar exposure in this study was that used in Signal Corps operations while the men in the previous study were using different radar as part of military intelligence operations. The data presented here in men firing the 155-mm howitzer combined with the results from the previous studies confirms that there are no deficits in semen quality in these men. The contradiction between the results of the radar exposure studies indicates that more data are needed to evaluate the relationship of military radar and male reproductive health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717697     DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6238(98)00023-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  6 in total

1.  Paternal occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Geir Mjøen; Dag Ottar Saetre; Rolv T Lie; Tore Tynes; Karl Gerhard Blaasaas; Merete Hannevik; Lorentz M Irgens
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Reproductive toxicology in occupational settings: an update.

Authors:  R Winker; H W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  Valborg Baste; Trond Riise; Bente E Moen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  5G mobile networks and health-a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz.

Authors:  Ken Karipidis; Rohan Mate; David Urban; Rick Tinker; Andrew Wood
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure.

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; Adele Green; Leeka Kheifets; David Savitz; Anthony Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Assessing the reproductive health of men with occupational exposures.

Authors:  Steven M Schrader; Katherine L Marlow
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.