Literature DB >> 16857939

Receptor activation alters inner surface potential during phagocytosis.

Tony Yeung1, Mauricio Terebiznik, Liming Yu, John Silvius, Wasif M Abidi, Mark Philips, Tim Levine, Andras Kapus, Sergio Grinstein.   

Abstract

The surface potential of biological membranes varies according to their lipid composition. We devised genetically encoded probes to assess surface potential in intact cells. These probes revealed marked, localized alterations in the charge of the inner surface of the plasma membrane of macrophages during the course of phagocytosis. Hydrolysis of phosphoinositides and displacement of phosphatidylserine accounted for the change in surface potential at the phagosomal cup. Signaling molecules such as K-Ras, Rac1, and c-Src that are targeted to the membrane by electrostatic interactions were rapidly released from membrane subdomains where the surface charge was altered by lipid remodeling during phagocytosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16857939     DOI: 10.1126/science.1129551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  130 in total

1.  A quantitative fluorometric approach for measuring the interaction of RhoGDI with membranes and Rho GTPases.

Authors:  Jared Johnson; Richard A Cerione; Jon W Erickson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  The GDI-like solubilizing factor PDEδ sustains the spatial organization and signalling of Ras family proteins.

Authors:  Anchal Chandra; Hernán E Grecco; Venkat Pisupati; David Perera; Liam Cassidy; Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Shehab A Ismail; Christian Hedberg; Michael Hanzal-Bayer; Ashok R Venkitaraman; Alfred Wittinghofer; Philippe I H Bastiaens
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Loss of insulin-induced activation of TRPM6 magnesium channels results in impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy.

Authors:  Anil V Nair; Berthold Hocher; Sjoerd Verkaart; Femke van Zeeland; Thiemo Pfab; Torsten Slowinski; You-Peng Chen; Karl Peter Schlingmann; André Schaller; Sabina Gallati; René J Bindels; Martin Konrad; Joost G Hoenderop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and GEF-H1 mediate depolarization-induced Rho activation and paracellular permeability increase.

Authors:  Faiza Waheed; Pam Speight; Glenn Kawai; Qinghong Dan; András Kapus; Katalin Szászi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.249

5.  Charge of the mito brigade. Focus on "Changes in mitochondrial surface charge mediate recruitment of signaling molecules during apoptosis".

Authors:  George R Dubyak
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Differential requirement of lipid rafts for FcγRIIA mediated effector activities.

Authors:  Joshua A Vieth; Moo-Kyung Kim; Xiao Qing Pan; Alan D Schreiber; Randall G Worth
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 7.  Nanoscale membrane organization: where biochemistry meets advanced microscopy.

Authors:  Alessandra Cambi; Diane S Lidke
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.100

8.  Charge density influences C1 domain ligand affinity and membrane interactions.

Authors:  Jessica S Kelsey; Tamas Geczy; Nancy E Lewin; Noemi Kedei; Colin S Hill; Julia S Selezneva; Christopher J Valle; Wonhee Woo; Inna Gorshkova; Peter M Blumberg
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 9.  Decoding P4-ATPase substrate interactions.

Authors:  Bartholomew P Roland; Todd R Graham
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 10.  Cellular and molecular interactions of phosphoinositides and peripheral proteins.

Authors:  Robert V Stahelin; Jordan L Scott; Cary T Frick
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.