BACKGROUND: The value of mesentericoportal vein resection (VR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma still remains controversial. METHODS: From 1989 to 2003, 45 consecutive patients with pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma underwent PD with mesentericoportal VR due to intraoperative macroscopic involvement of the superior mesenteric or portal vein (VR+ group). They were compared with 88 patients who underwent PD for adenocarcinoma without VR over the same time period (VR- group) and matched for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathological diagnosis, and nodal involvement. Preoperative features, intraoperative parameters, postoperative course, and survival were compared between the VR+ group and VR- group. Factors that may influence survival were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mortality, morbidity, and mean hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (VR+ 4.4%, 56%, and 22.6 days, respectively; VR- 5.7%, 64%, 24.6 days, respectively). In the group VR+, vein invasion was histologically proven in 29 (64%) patients. Three-year global survival and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ between the two groups: VR+ 22% and 14%, respectively; VR- 25% and 21%, respectively (log-rank: P=0.69 and P=0.39, respectively). Neither VR nor histologically proven vein involvement significantly impacted survival duration. On multivariate analysis, tumor-free margin was the most important prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Vein resection during PD can be performed safely. Patients with adenocarcinoma who require VR during PD have a survival not different from that of patients who undergo standard PD. Macroscopic isolated mesentericoportal vein involvement is not a contraindication for PD in patients with adenocarcinoma provided disease-free margins can be obtained.
BACKGROUND: The value of mesentericoportal vein resection (VR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma still remains controversial. METHODS: From 1989 to 2003, 45 consecutive patients with pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma underwent PD with mesentericoportal VR due to intraoperative macroscopic involvement of the superior mesenteric or portal vein (VR+ group). They were compared with 88 patients who underwent PD for adenocarcinoma without VR over the same time period (VR- group) and matched for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathological diagnosis, and nodal involvement. Preoperative features, intraoperative parameters, postoperative course, and survival were compared between the VR+ group and VR- group. Factors that may influence survival were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mortality, morbidity, and mean hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (VR+ 4.4%, 56%, and 22.6 days, respectively; VR- 5.7%, 64%, 24.6 days, respectively). In the group VR+, vein invasion was histologically proven in 29 (64%) patients. Three-year global survival and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ between the two groups: VR+ 22% and 14%, respectively; VR- 25% and 21%, respectively (log-rank: P=0.69 and P=0.39, respectively). Neither VR nor histologically proven vein involvement significantly impacted survival duration. On multivariate analysis, tumor-free margin was the most important prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Vein resection during PD can be performed safely. Patients with adenocarcinoma who require VR during PD have a survival not different from that of patients who undergo standard PD. Macroscopic isolated mesentericoportal vein involvement is not a contraindication for PD in patients with adenocarcinoma provided disease-free margins can be obtained.
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alexander Stojadinovic; Ari Brooks; Axel Hoos; David P Jaques; Kevin C Conlon; Murray F Brennan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Thomas J Howard; Nicholas Villanustre; Seth A Moore; John DeWitt; Julia LeBlanc; Dean Maglinte; Lee McHenry Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Manju D Chandrasegaram; Guy D Eslick; Wayne Lee; Mark E Brooke-Smith; Rob Padbury; Christopher S Worthley; John W Chen; John A Windsor Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Vyacheslav I Egorov; Roman V Petrov; Elena N Solodinina; Gregory G Karmazanovsky; Natalia S Starostina; Natalia A Kuruschkina Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-04-27
Authors: Chan Woo Cho; Yang Jin Park; Young-Wook Kim; Sung Ho Choi; Jin Seok Heo; Dong Wook Choi; Dong-Ik Kim Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 1.859
Authors: Roberto L Meniconi; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Giovanni Vennarecci; Pasquale Lepiane; Marco Colasanti; Andrea Laurenzi; Lidia Colace; Roberto Santoro Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 3.452