Literature DB >> 25844355

Follow-up results of acute portal and splenic vein thrombosis with or without anticoagulation therapy after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Chan Woo Cho1, Yang Jin Park1, Young-Wook Kim1, Sung Ho Choi1, Jin Seok Heo1, Dong Wook Choi1, Dong-Ik Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acute portal and splenic vein thrombosis (APSVT) after hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) surgery is a rare but serious complication and a treatment strategy has not been well established. To assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy for treating APSVT after HBP surgery.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 82 patients who were diagnosed with APSVT within 4 weeks after HBP surgery from October 2002 to November 2012 at a single institute. We assigned patients to the anticoagulation group (n = 32) or nonanticoagulation group (n = 50) and compared patient characteristics, complications, and the recanalization rate of APSVT between these two groups.
RESULTS: APSVT was diagnosed a mean of 8.6 ± 4.8 days after HBP surgery. Patients' characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no bleeding complications related to anticoagulation therapy. The 1-year cumulative recanalization rate of anticoagulation group and nonanticoagulation group were 71.4% and 34.1%, respectively, which is statistically significant (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). In Cox regression model for multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with the recanalization rate of APSVT after HBP surgery were anticoagulation therapy (P = 0.003; hazard ration [HR], 2.364; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.341-4.168), the absence of a vein reconstruction procedure (P = 0.027; HR, 2.557; 95% CI, 1.111-5.885), and operation type (liver resection rather than pancreatic resection; P = 0.005, HR, 2.350; 95% CI, 1.286-4.296).
CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation therapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with APSVT after HBP surgery. Further prospective studies of larger patient populations are necessary to confirm our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulants; Mesentery; Portal vein; Surgery; Thrombosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844355      PMCID: PMC4384288          DOI: 10.4174/astr.2015.88.4.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res        ISSN: 2288-6575            Impact factor:   1.859


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mesenteric venous thrombosis.

Authors:  S Kumar; M G Sarr; P S Kamath
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Portal vein thrombosis: a concise review.

Authors:  Abhasnee Sobhonslidsuk; K Rajender Reddy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Thrombolytic treatment of portal thrombosis.

Authors:  Piotr Malkowski; Jacek Pawlak; Bogdan Michalowicz; Jerzy Szczerban; Tadeusz Wroblewski; Elzbieta Leowska; Marek Krawczyk
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagán; Manuel Hernández-Guerra; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Acute superior mesenteric-portal vein thrombosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: treatment by operative thrombectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas J Zyromski; Thomas J Howard
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Recent portal or mesenteric venous thrombosis: increased recognition and frequent recanalization on anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  B Condat; F Pessione; M Helene Denninger; S Hillaire; D Valla
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Treatment of portal vein thrombosis by thrombectomy and regional thrombolysis.

Authors:  S Demertzis; B Ringe; D Gulba; H Rosenthal; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Current strategies to minimize the bleeding risk of warfarin.

Authors:  David Snipelisky; Fred Kusumoto
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Therapeutic anticoagulant does not modify thromboses rate vein after venous reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Mehdi Ouaïssi; Igor Sielezneff; Nicolas Pirro; Rémi Bon Mardion; Jean Batiste Chaix; Abdelrhame Merad; Stéphane Berdah; Vincent Moutardier; Silvia Cresti; Olivier Emungania; Loundou Anderson; Brunet Christian; Sastre Bernard
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and decreased portal vein angle are risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery.

Authors:  Manh-Thau Cao; Ryota Higuchi; Takehisa Yazawa; Shuichiro Uemura; Wataru Izumo; Yutaro Matsunaga; Yasuto Sato; Satoru Morita; Toru Furukawa; Hiroto Egawa; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Computed tomography evaluation of early post-operative complications of the Whipple procedure.

Authors:  Emre Emekli; Elif Gündoğdu
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.