Literature DB >> 1684669

Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision.

J Ross1, H D Speed.   

Abstract

After a preliminary study of visual evoked potentials (VEPS) to a test grating seen in the presence of masks at different orientations, psychophysical data are presented showing the effects of adaptation and of masking on thresholds for detecting the same test grating. The test is a vertical grating of spatial frequency 2 cycles per degree; adapting and masking gratings differ from the test either in orientation or in spatial frequency. The effects of adaptation and masking are explained by a single mechanism model that assumes: (i) adaptation and masking both alter the contrast response (or transducer) function of the mechanism that detects the test; (ii) masks, but not adaptors, stimulate the mechanism that detects the test; and (iii) a test is detectable when it raises response level by a constant amount. The model incorporates two distinct tuning functions, a broad adaptive contrast function and a narrow effective contrast function. It accounts adequately for all the data, including the location and size of the facilitative dip found in some masking functions, the constant slopes of the threshold elevation segments of adaptation functions and the varying slopes of masking functions. It also predicts the sometimes surprising joint effects of adaptation followed by masking and of two masks operating simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1684669     DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The observant mind: self-awareness of attentional status.

Authors:  Noriko Yamagishi; Stephen J Anderson; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; David J Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A multiplicative model for spatial interaction in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Jason C Park; Jennifer Salant; Sonya Thomas; Joy Hirsch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Release from cross-orientation suppression facilitates 3D shape perception.

Authors:  Andrea Li; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Knowledge-Driven Contrast Gain Control is Characterized by Two Distinct Electrocortical Markers.

Authors:  Bratislav V Misić; Bruce A Schneider; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Fang Fang; Allen M Y Cheong; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.