Literature DB >> 16846295

Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.

Valérie Goffaux1, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

Faces are perceived holistically, a phenomenon best illustrated when the processing of a face feature is affected by the other features. Here, the authors tested the hypothesis that the holistic perception of a face mainly relies on its low spatial frequencies. Holistic face perception was tested in two classical paradigms: the whole-part advantage (Experiment 1) and the composite face effect (Experiments 2-4). Holistic effects were equally large or larger for low-pass filtered faces as compared to full-spectrum faces and significantly larger than for high-pass filtered faces. The disproportionate composite effect found for low-pass filtered faces was not observed when holistic perception was disrupted by inversion (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 showed that the composite face effect was enhanced only for low spatial frequencies, but not for intermediate spatial frequencies known be critical for face recognition. These findings indicate that holistic face perception is largely supported by low spatial frequencies. They also suggest that holistic processing precedes the analysis of local features during face perception. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846295     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  102 in total

1.  Decoding simulated neurodynamics predicts the perceptual consequences of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jianing V Shi; Jim Wielaard; R Theodore Smith; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

3.  Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression.

Authors:  Andrea Butler; Ipek Oruc; Christopher J Fox; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

6.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli.

Authors:  Artyom Zinchenko; Hyojung Kim; Adrian Danek; Hermann J Müller; Dragan Rangelov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-01

8.  The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Xiaobai Li; Kari Chow; Jia Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Diana Omigie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The composite task reveals stronger holistic processing in children than adults for child faces.

Authors:  Tirta Susilo; Kate Crookes; Elinor McKone; Hannah Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.