Literature DB >> 16845547

Influence of tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on clinical outcome using single-row Mason-Allen suture technique: a prospective, MRI controlled study.

Sven Lichtenberg1, Dennis Liem, Petra Magosch, Peter Habermeyer.   

Abstract

The reported functional results of rotator cuff repair performed arthroscopically have been good. Only little is known about the cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair and how it influences the outcome. The aim of the study is to set a baseline of what rate of healing response respectively re-tears to expect and how cuff integrity alters the outcome. Fifty-three consecutive patients with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear were arthroscopically operated and their tendons repaired. All pre- and postoperative data were prospectively collected. At a minimum follow-up after 24 months (average 26.4 months), the integrity of the cuff was evaluated by an open magnetic resonance imaging and the patients' function and satisfaction were documented and graded to the sex- and age-related Constant-score also using a dynamometer for strength testing. The re-tear rate was 24.5% with 13 non-healed tendons. The Constant-score of all patients improved significantly. The scores of the patients with a re-tear were significantly lower than those of the patient with an intact cuff. That was due to a less good performance in strength testing. The other categories of the Constant-score did not show any differences. The age of the patients with a re-tear was significantly higher. With the exception of age, we did not find any negative prognostic factor for a re-tear, and with the exception of re-tear no other factor influenced the Constant-score. Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair yields a re-tear rate of 25% which is comparable with the results of open or mini/open repair. Cuff integrity influences postoperative strength and Constant-score. Patients older than 65 years show a higher re-tear rate. Therapeutic Level IV is the level of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16845547     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0132-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair.

Authors:  S S Burkhart; S M Danaceau; C E Pearce
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.

Authors:  Markus Thomas Scheibel; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior (supraspinatus/subscapularis) rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Classification of biceps subluxation/instability.

Authors:  William F Bennett
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Association of osteopenia of the humeral head with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Dominik C Meyer; Sandro F Fucentese; Bruno Koller; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Peter J Millett; Carlos A Guanche; Stephen A Santangelo; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

Authors:  D T Harryman; L A Mack; K Y Wang; S E Jackins; M L Richardson; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up.

Authors:  Franklin Wilson; Viktor Hinov; Gayl Adams
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  [Reconstruction of big rotator cuff ruptures. A new technique of tendon refixation with the corkscrew suture anchor system].

Authors:  M A Kessler; S Lichtenberg; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Outcome of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Watson; David H Sonnabend
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Christian Gerhardt; Jianhai Chen; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Shane Nho; Anthony Romeo; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The acromial index is not predictive for failed rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Patricio Melean; Sven Lichtenberg; Fredy Montoya; Stephan Riedmann; Petra Magosch; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.

Authors:  P Randelli; P Spennacchio; V Ragone; P Arrigoni; A Casella; P Cabitza
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

5.  A comparison of early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Michael E Hantes; Georgios K Karidakis; Mariana Vlychou; Sokratis Varitimidis; Zoe Dailiana; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Salma Chaudhury; Stephen E Gwilym; Jane Moser; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparison of tenocytes and mesenchymal stem cells seeded on biodegradable scaffolds in a full-size tendon defect model.

Authors:  M F Pietschmann; B Frankewycz; P Schmitz; D Docheva; B Sievers; V Jansson; M Schieker; P E Müller
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Effect of anterior supraspinatus tendon partial-thickness tears on infraspinatus tendon strain through a range of joint rotation angles.

Authors:  Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Andrew F Kuntz; Soung-Yon Kim; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.