Literature DB >> 16845283

Assessment of cardiac function using multidetector row computed tomography.

Sarwar H Orakzai1, Raza H Orakzai, Khurram Nasir, Matthew J Budoff.   

Abstract

In patients with suspected or documented heart disease, a precise quantitative and qualitative assessment of cardiac function is critical for clinical diagnosis, risk stratification, management and prognosis. Cardiac CT is increasingly being used in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Initially multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) was used chiefly for detecting coronary artery stenosis and assessment of cardiac morphology. Electron beam computed tomography has been shown to provide a highly accurate ejection fraction (+/-1%), with 50 ms image acquisition per image. Retrospective electrocardiographic gating allows for image reconstruction in any phase of the cardiac cycle. Thus, end systolic and end diastolic images can be produced to assess ventricular volumes and function. Despite lower temporal resolution than electron beam computed tomography, the ability of MDCT to assess ejection fraction is preserved. In the assessment of cardiac function, MDCT has been shown to be in good agreement with echocardiography, cineventriculography, single photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The fast technical development of scanner hardware along with multisegmental image reconstruction has led to rapid improvement of spatial and temporal resolution and significantly faster cardiac scans. The same data that is acquired for MDCT angiography can also be used for evaluation of cardiac function. Considering contrast media application, radiation exposure, and limited temporal resolution, MDCT solely for analysis of cardiac function parameters seems not reasonable at the present time. However, because the data is already obtained during coronary evaluation, the combination of noninvasive coronary artery imaging and assessment of cardiac function with MDCT is a suitable approach to a conclusive cardiac workup in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. MDCT seems suitable for assessment of cardiac function by MDCT when results are held in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. Given the radiation dose and contrast requirement, referring a patient to MDCT only for evaluation of function is not warranted, but rather adds important clinical information to the already acquired data during retrospective triggering for MDCT angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16845283     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200607000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Joon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.

Authors:  S Busch; T R C Johnson; B J Wintersperger; N Minaifar; A Bhargava; C Rist; M F Reiser; C Becker; K Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A technical solution to avoid partial scan artifacts in cardiac MDCT.

Authors:  A N Primak; Y Dong; O P Dzyubak; S M Jorgensen; C H McCollough; E L Ritman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Defining myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  James Stirrup; Edward Nicol; S Richard Underwood
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparison of global left ventricular function using 20 phases with 10-phase reconstructions in multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Yeon-jee Ko; Song Soo Kim; Woon-Ju Park; Jin-Ok Jeong; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Value of Cardiac CT in Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Deepa Mangalat; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; Vasiliki Georgiopoulou; Arthur Stillman; Javed Butler
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2009-12

8.  Effects of propranolol on the left ventricular volume of normal subjects during CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yuan Heng Mo; Fu Shan Jaw; Yung Cheng Wang; Chin Ming Jeng; Shinn Forng Peng
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Aksuyek S Celebi; Hulya Yalcin; Fatih Yalcin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  S-M Ko; Y-J Kim; J-H Park; N-M Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.