Literature DB >> 16843813

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3- to 5-year follow-up.

Yi-Sheng Chan1, Shih-Chieh Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Alvin Chao-Yu Chen, Li-Jen Yuan, Kuo-Yao Hsu, Ching-Jen Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study prospectively evaluated 20 patients treated consecutively to determine patient outcomes, efficacy, and complication potential of arthroscopically assisted posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction performed with hamstring tendon grafts.
METHODS: Twenty patients (15 men and 5 women), each with an isolated PCL injury, underwent PCL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft and were enrolled in this prospective study. Average age at time of surgery was 29 years (range, 20 to 57 years). Average time from injury to surgery was 4 months (range, 3 to 12 months). Average follow-up period was 40 months (range, 36 to 50 months). Patients underwent regular follow-up after clinical and radiographic preoperative and postoperative evaluation. Follow-up examinations comprised the Lysholm Knee Score, the Tegner Activity Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, thigh muscle assessment, and radiographic evaluation.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative Lysholm score for 20 knees was 63 +/- 10 (range, 48-73); mean postoperative Lysholm score was 93 +/- 9 (range, 77-100). Eighteen of 20 patients (90%) showed good or excellent results at final assessment. Mean preinjury and preoperative Tegner scores were 7 +/- 1.5 (range, 5-9) and 3 +/- 1.9 (range, 2-5), respectively; mean postoperative Tegner score for 20 knees was 6.3 +/- 2.4 (range, 4-9). In final IKDC ratings, 85% of patients (17 of 20) were assessed as normal or near normal (grade A or B). A statistically significant improvement was seen in thigh girth difference, extensor strength ratio, and flexor strength ratio before and after reconstruction at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: After follow-up for longer than 36 months, analytical results showed satisfactory function after PCL reconstruction with the use of hamstring tendon autografts. We suggest that the hamstring tendon autograft is a safe, effective, and acceptable choice for PCL reconstruction, and that it affords good ligament reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16843813     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  18 in total

1.  [Outcome 4 years after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  M Lahner; T Vogel; M S Schulz; M J Strobel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Odd Arve Lien; Emilie Jul-Larsen Aas; Steinar Johansen; Tom Clement Ludvigsen; Wender Figved; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prospective analysis using a patient-based health-related scale shows lower functional scores after posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions as compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee.

Authors:  Satoshi Ochiai; Tetsuo Hagino; Shinya Senga; Takashi Yamashita; Takashi Ando; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  All-Anterior Approach for Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation.

Authors:  Tianwu Chen; Shaohua Liu; Jiwu Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 5.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Delayed compartment syndrome of leg and foot due to rupture of popliteal artery pseudoaneurysm following posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmad Shahrulazua; Mahidon Rafedon; Mohd Nasir Mohd Nizlan; James Anthony Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-01-23

7.  Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation.

Authors:  Hong Chul Lim; Ji Hoon Bae; Joon Ho Wang; Jae Hyuk Yang; Chang Woo Seok; Hak Jun Kim; Seung Joo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective review of hamstring tendon graft versus LARS artificial ligament.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu Wen; Haishan Wu; Qirong Qian; Yuli Wu; Xiangbo Lin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Bin Li; Jia-Shi Wang; Ming He; Guang-Bin Wang; Peng Shen; Lun-Hao Bai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anatomic is better than isometric posterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement based upon in vivo simulation.

Authors:  Willem A Kernkamp; Axel J T Jens; Nathan H Varady; Ewoud R A van Arkel; Rob G H H Nelissen; Peter D Asnis; Robert F LaPrade; Samuel K Van de Velde; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.