Literature DB >> 16843810

Prognostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography for Czerny stage II and III acetabular labral tears.

Brett A Freedman1, Benjamin K Potter, Philip A Dinauer, Jeffrey R Giuliani, Timothy R Kuklo, Kevin P Murphy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the intraobserver reliability and prognostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) on the basis of postoperative outcome measures following arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement (partial limbectomy).
METHODS: Between January 1999 and November 2000, 24 patients (13 females, 11 males) with an average age of 37.1 years (range, 21 to 56 years) underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of presumed acetabular labral tears. All patients underwent preoperative MRA and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); images were evaluated by a single musculoskeletal radiologist on 2 independent occasions. Hip arthroscopy was performed on all patients. Outcomes were assessed by means of the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires, which were completed by patients an average of 24.1 months (range, 12 to 55 months) postoperatively. The accuracy of the initial read, as well as the prognostic value of the Czerny MRA classification system for stage II (intrasubstance tears) and stage III (complete avulsions) acetabular labral tears, was assessed.
RESULTS: Twenty-two of 23 tears (96%) were detected on the initial read. On the basis of intraoperative findings, 1 false-positive MRA, 1 false-negative MRA, and 1 incident of MRA overstaging were reported. On repeat interpretation, 23 of 23 (100%) tears were identified, and intraobserver reliability for recording the presence of a tear was excellent (kappa coefficient = 0.96). No difference was noted in outcomes between patients with or without arthroscopic evidence of chondromalacia (all P > .29), or between patients older or younger than 30 years (all P > .34). Likewise, no difference in outcome was seen between 15 patients with Czerny stage II tears revealed on MRA versus 9 patients with Czerny stage III tears (all P > .79).
CONCLUSIONS: MRA is sensitive and accurate for the detection of acetabular labral tears, with excellent intraobserver reliability. Arthroscopic partial limbectomy is successful in two thirds of patients. Patients with Czerny stage II and III tears do not appear to have significantly different outcomes following arthroscopic labral debridement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16843810     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  [Coxarthrosis - a radiological approach and guidelines].

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Gemma Hilton; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Correlation of magnetic resonance arthrography with revision hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Philip J Glassner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip is dependent on specialist training of the radiologist.

Authors:  Ciara M McGuire; Peter MacMahon; Damien P Byrne; Eoin Kavanagh; Kevin J Mulhall
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Normal anatomical variants of the labrum of the hip at magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Eoin C Kavanagh; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Cartilage thickness in the hip measured by MRI and stereology before and after periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Jens R Nyengaard; John Gelineck; Kjeld Soballe; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: poor cost utility for treatment of adult patients with hip pain.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Ryan M Nunley; Muyibat Adelani; Nathan Mall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Nonarthritic hip joint pain.

Authors:  Keelan Enseki; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Douglas M White; Michael T Cibulka; Judith Woehrle; Timothy L Fagerson; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Inger Mechlenburg; John Gelineck; Lars Bolvig; Steffen Jacobsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.