Literature DB >> 21912884

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip is dependent on specialist training of the radiologist.

Ciara M McGuire1, Peter MacMahon, Damien P Byrne, Eoin Kavanagh, Kevin J Mulhall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Significant differences between magnetic resonance imaging reports and intraoperative findings at the time of hip arthroscopy were documented in our practice. We sought to examine the accuracy of radiological reporting of hip pathology based on the training level of the reporting radiologist.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of hip arthroscopies carried out between July 2008 and June 2009 identified 61 cases where original MRI scans had been reported by general community radiologists. These scans were then reviewed by musculoskeletal specialist radiologists who were blinded to both the original report and the surgical findings. Accuracy of both subsets of radiologists was compared to arthroscopic findings with regard to labral, acetabular, femoral and impingement lesions.
RESULTS: Musculoskeletal radiologists performed better than community radiologists in terms of overall accuracy. Accuracy rates for MSK radiologists were 85, 79, 59, and 82% for labral, acetabular chondrosis, and femoral chondrosis and impingement lesions, respectively. Whereas accuracy rates for community radiologists were 70, 28, 52, and 59% (p values = 0.08, <0.001, 0.59, <0.001). Accuracy was significantly improved for both groups of radiologists when MR arthrograms were reviewed rather than conventional MRIs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the relationship between accuracy of reporting and the training level of the performing radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912884     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1266-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip.

Authors:  Raymond J Hong; Tudor H Hughes; Amilcare Gentili; Christine B Chung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography.

Authors:  M Leunig; S Werlen; A Ungersböck; K Ito; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging.

Authors:  Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  S Konan; F Rayan; G Meermans; J Witt; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

5.  MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy.

Authors:  C Czerny; S Hofmann; M Urban; C Tschauner; A Neuhold; M Pretterklieber; M P Recht; J Kramer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Acetabular labral tears and cartilage lesions of the hip: indirect MR arthrographic correlation with arthroscopy--a preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael B Zlatkin; Deborah Pevsner; Timothy G Sanders; Chris R Hancock; Cesar E Ceballos; Mauricio F Herrera
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Prognostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography for Czerny stage II and III acetabular labral tears.

Authors:  Brett A Freedman; Benjamin K Potter; Philip A Dinauer; Jeffrey R Giuliani; Timothy R Kuklo; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Radiologist experience and CT examination quality determine metastasis detection in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; J J Hermans; W De Wever; M J C Eijkemans; E W Steyerberg; C Faasse; E P M van Helmond; A M de Leeuw; A C Sikkenk; A R de Vries; E H de Vries; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: dependence on the level of training of the performing radiologist for diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  John S Theodoropoulos; Gustav Andreisek; Edward J Harvey; Preston Wolin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Hip joint pathology: clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and arthroscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Bruce Mitchell; Paul McCrory; Peter Brukner; John O'Donnell; Emma Colson; Robert Howells
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.638

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of the acetabular sublabral sulcus at MR arthrography in patients under 17 years of age: does it exist?

Authors:  Olaf Magerkurth; Jon A Jacobson; Yoav Morag; David Fessell; Asheesh Bedi; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reports of magnetic resonance images of the hip in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: is useful information provided to the orthopedic surgeon?

Authors:  Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Marcelo Casaccia; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Normal anatomical variants of the labrum of the hip at magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Eoin C Kavanagh; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Validity of direct magnetic resonance arthrogram in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and their outcome post hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Rahul Mohan; P Nithin Unnikrishnan; Ravindra Gudena
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-12

5.  Second opinions in orthopedic oncology imaging: can fellowship training reduce clinically significant discrepancies?

Authors:  Aleksandr Rozenberg; Barry E Kenneally; John A Abraham; Kristin Strogus; Johannes B Roedl; William B Morrison; Adam C Zoga
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Prevalence of acetabular labral tears in asymptomatic children.

Authors:  Andrew G Georgiadis; Mark A Seeley; Nancy A Chauvin; Wudbhav N Sankar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 7.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance studies in the detection of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A M Saied; C Redant; M El-Batouty; M R El-Lakkany; W A El-Adl; J Anthonissen; R Verdonk; E A Audenaert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  3.0 T MRI is more recommended to detect acetabular labral tears than MR Arthrography: an updated meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Chunbao Li; Wenliang Wang; Baiqing Zhang; Weicheng Miao; Yujie Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Assessment of acetabular chondral damage and labral pathologies via direct MR arthrography: specialization matters.

Authors:  A Zimmerer; M M Schneider; K Tramountanis; V Janz; W Miehlke; G I Wassilew; C Sobau
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.928

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.