Literature DB >> 16839306

An electrophysiological investigation of preparatory attentional control in a spatial Stroop task.

Emily R Stern1, Jennifer A Mangels.   

Abstract

Top-down attentional control is required when subjects must attend to one of multiple conflicting stimulus features, such as in the Stroop task. Performance may be improved when such control is implemented in advance of stimulus presentation, yet few studies have examined this issue. Our investigation employed a spatial Stroop task with a manual response, allowing us to focus on the effects of preparatory attention on verbal processing when it is the less automatic attribute. A letter cue (P or W) presented for 2200 msec instructed subjects to respond on the basis of the position or meaning of a word (up, down, left, right) placed in an incongruent position relative to center. Event-related potentials recorded during pre- and poststimulus periods were analyzed as a function of reaction time to the target stimulus (fast vs. slow) in order to differentiate neural activity associated with more or less successful implementation of control. During the prestimulus period, fast responses to subsequent targets were associated with enhanced slow-wave activity over right frontal and bilateral central-parietal regions. During the poststimulus period, fast word trials were uniquely associated with an enhanced inferior temporal negativity (ITN) from 200 to 600 msec. More importantly, a correlation between frontal prestimulus activity and the poststimulus ITN suggested that frontal preparatory activity played a role in facilitating conceptual processing of the verbal stimulus when it arrived, providing an important link between preparatory attention and mechanisms that improve performance in the face of conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839306     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.

Authors:  Grace Lai; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Preparatory neural activity predicts performance on a conflict task.

Authors:  Emily R Stern; Tor D Wager; Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mangels; Brady Butterfield; Justin Lamb; Catherine Good; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Theta low-gamma phase amplitude coupling in the human orbitofrontal cortex increases during a conflict-processing task.

Authors:  Kuang-Hsuan Chen; Austin M Tang; Zachary D Gilbert; Roberto Martin Del Campo-Vera; Rinu Sebastian; Angad S Gogia; Shivani Sundaram; Emiliano Tabarsi; Yelim Lee; Richard Lee; George Nune; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  A potential role of the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula in cognitive control, brain rhythms, and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Mattie Tops; Maarten A S Boksem
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-10

6.  Rumination and Rebound from Failure as a Function of Gender and Time on Task.

Authors:  Ronald C Whiteman; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-02-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.