Literature DB >> 16836673

Age, size, and lead factors alone do not predict venous obstruction in children and young adults with transvenous lead systems.

Yaniv Bar-Cohen1, Charles I Berul, Mark E Alexander, Elizabeth B Fortescue, Edward P Walsh, John K Triedman, Frank Cecchin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous occlusion is a recognized complication of transvenous pacing, and lead cross-sectional area indexed to body surface area (BSA) has been used to predict venous obstruction in children.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and incidence of angiographic venous obstruction after transvenous lead implantation in both children and young adults.
METHODS: Contrast venography was obtained in 85 of 90 consecutive patients undergoing repeat pacemaker or ICD procedures from 2002 to 2004 at a single cardiac center. Venograms were graded as complete venous obstruction, significant partial obstruction (>70% with collaterals), or patent.
RESULTS: The cohort had a median age of 15.0 years at implant and was divided into two age groups: 3-12 years (n = 35) and 13 years and over (n = 50). After a median interval of 6.5 years, complete obstruction was seen in 11 of 85 patients (13%) and partial obstruction in another 10 patients (12%). No significant differences were seen in the incidence of obstruction between the two age groups although younger patients had a larger lead indexed to BSA ratio (6.82 vs 5.05, P = 0.005). There were no significant differences between obstructed and nonobstructed patients in relation to age, size, growth, or lead factors.
CONCLUSION: Transvenous lead systems implanted in young children have a similar incidence of venous occlusion compared to older patients. Furthermore, patient age, body size, and lead characteristics at implant do not clearly predict venous occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16836673     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00489.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  10 in total

1.  A computer modeling tool for comparing novel ICD electrode orientations in children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Dana H Brooks; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review.

Authors:  Daiji Takeuchi; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Pacemaker-associated cyanosis in an adolescent: The answer hiding behind shadows.

Authors:  Sg Wittekind; Jc Salerno; Ae Rubio
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-10

4.  Impact of transvenous ventricular pacing leads on tricuspid regurgitation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Gregory Webster; Renee Margossian; Mark E Alexander; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman; Edward P Walsh; Charles I Berul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Predictors of venous stenosis or occlusion following first transvenous cardiac device implantation: Prospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrzej Cacko; Eliza Kozyra-Pydyś; Monika Gawałko; Grzegorz Opolski; Marcin Grabowski
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.283

6.  Case series of late lead dislodgement of Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing leads in growing paediatric patients.

Authors:  Li Yen Ng; Sarah Gallagher; Kevin P Walsh
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  Severity and Extent of Lead-Related Venous Obstruction in More Than 3000 Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Marek Czajkowski; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Jarosław Kosior; Dorota Nowosielecka; Łukasz Tułecki; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-08-17

8.  Cardiac pacing and defibrillation in children and young adults.

Authors:  Harinder R Singh; Anjan S Batra; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-01-01

9.  Subcutaneous defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  İlker Ertuğrul; Tevfik Karagöz; Hakan Aykan; Işıl Yıldırım; Sema Özer; Heves Karagöz; Mustafa Yılmaz
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maully J Shah; Michael J Silka; Jennifer N Avari Silva; Seshadri Balaji; Cheyenne M Beach; Monica N Benjamin; Charles I Berul; Bryan Cannon; Frank Cecchin; Mitchell I Cohen; Aarti S Dalal; Brynn E Dechert; Anne Foster; Roman Gebauer; M Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia; Prince J Kannankeril; Peter P Karpawich; Jeffery J Kim; Mani Ram Krishna; Peter Kubuš; Martin J LaPage; Douglas Y Mah; Lindsey Malloy-Walton; Aya Miyazaki; Kara S Motonaga; Mary C Niu; Melissa Olen; Thomas Paul; Eric Rosenthal; Elizabeth V Saarel; Massimo Stefano Silvetti; Elizabeth A Stephenson; Reina B Tan; John Triedman; Nicholas H Von Bergen; Philip L Wackel
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-07-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.