Literature DB >> 16835739

Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables.

Massimo Mariconda1, Olimpio Galasso, Luigi Imbimbo, Giovanni Lotti, Carlo Milano.   

Abstract

Although the effect of physical workload on the occurrence of low back pain (LBP) has been extensively investigated, few quantitative studies have examined the morphological changes visualized via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relation to occupational variables. The relationship between the severity of some abnormalities such as lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis and physical or psychosocial occupational risk factors has not been investigated previously. In this cross-sectional study patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) long-standing (minimum 1-year) LBP radiating down the leg (or not); (2) age more than 40 years; (3) willingness to undergo an MRI of the lumbar spine; and (4) ability to speak Italian. Primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between occupational exposure and morphological MRI findings, while controlling for the individual risk factors for LBP. Secondarily, we looked at the influence of this exposure and the degenerative changes in the lumbar spine on clinical symptoms and the related disability. Lumbar MRI scans from 120 symptomatic patients were supplemented by the results of structured interviews, which provided personal, medical, and occupational histories. All occupational factors were arranged on scales of increasing exposure, whereas pain and disability were assessed using ad hoc validated questionnaires. Evidence of intervertebral disc narrowing or herniation and the occurrence and severity of spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis was obtained from the MRI scans and a summative degenerative score was then calculated. We detected a direct association between increasing age and the global amount of degenerative change, the severity of intervertebral disc height loss, the number of narrowed discs, stenosis, the number of stenotic levels, and spondylolisthesis. Physical occupational exposure was not associated with the presence of lumbar disc degeneration and narrowing per se, but a higher degree of such an exposure was directly associated with a higher degree of degeneration (P=0.017). Spondylolistesis and stenosis were positively related to heavy workload (P=0.014) and the manual handling of materials (P=0.023), respectively. Psychosocial occupational discomfort was directly associated to stenosis (P=0.041) and number of stenotic levels (P=0.019). A heavier job workload was the only occupational factor positively related to the degree of disability at the multivariate analysis (P=0.002). Total amount of degeneration in the lumbar spine directly influenced pain duration (P=0.011) and degree of disability (P=0.050). These results suggest that caution should be exercised when symptomatic subjects with evidence of degenerative changes on MRI scans engage in strenuous physical labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835739      PMCID: PMC2200682          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0036-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  45 in total

Review 1.  The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration.

Authors:  T Videman; M C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Evaluation and management of occupational low back disorders.

Authors:  E Johanning
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Influence of occupational factors on the relation between socioeconomic status and self-reported back pain in a population-based sample of German adults with back pain.

Authors:  U Latza; T Kohlmann; R Deck; H Raspe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C de Vet; M Douwes; B W Koes; M C Miedema; G A Ariëns; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  K Luoma; H Riihimäki; R Luukkonen; R Raininko; E Viikari-Juntura; A Lamminen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  To what extent do current and past physical and psychosocial occupational factors explain care-seeking for low back pain in a working population? Results from the Musculoskeletal Intervention Center-Norrtälje Study.

Authors:  E Vingård; L Alfredsson; M Hagberg; A Kilbom; T Theorell; M Waldenström; E W Hjelm; C Wiktorin; C Hogstedt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain.

Authors:  Marlene Fransen; Mark Woodward; Robyn Norton; Carolyn Coggan; Martin Dawe; Nicolette Sheridan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Norbert Semmer; Daniel Birkhofer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy.

Authors:  A Herno; K Partanen; T Talaslahti; E Kaukanen; V Turunen; O Suomalainen; O Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Prevalence and risk factors of lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly Chinese men and women.

Authors:  Lai-Chang He; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Jing-Shan Gong; James F Griffith; Xian-Jun Zeng; Anthony W L Kwok; Jason C S Leung; Timothy Kwok; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Pelvic retroversion is the key protective mechanism of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Sibei Li; Zhaomin Zheng; Jiranru Wang; Huafeng Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar spondylolisthesis among elderly men: prevalence, correlates, and progression.

Authors:  Patrick J Denard; Kathleen F Holton; Jessica Miller; Howard A Fink; Deborah M Kado; Jung U Yoo; Lynn M Marshall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Deconditioning in chronic low back pain: might there be a relationship between fitness and magnetic resonance imaging findings?

Authors:  Ayce Atalay; Nur Turhan; Basar Atalay
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Howard S An; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Anna Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Thomas Errico; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Correlations between sedimentation sign, dural sac cross-sectional area, and clinical symptoms of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Frequency and clinical meaning of long-term degenerative changes after lumbar discectomy visualized on imaging tests.

Authors:  Massimo Mariconda; Olimpio Galasso; Paolo Attingenti; Gianluigi Federico; Carlo Milano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Christian Hellum; Øivind Gjertsen; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Geir Egil Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Authors:  Saman Madinei; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Risk factors for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  John G Devine; Jeannette M Schenk-Kisser; Andrea C Skelly
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.