Literature DB >> 16835336

Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research.

Beth M Ford1, James S Evans, Elena M Stoffel, Judith Balmaña, Meredith M Regan, Sapna Syngal.   

Abstract

Previous studies have identified low patient accrual in large-scale cancer clinical trials, particularly for underrepresented groups, such as ethnic minorities, females, and patients >65 years. As there have been few studies examining participation in cancer genetics epidemiologic research, our objective was to identify clinical and demographic factors predicting enrollment in these studies. A total of 1,111 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer presenting to a gastrointestinal oncology clinic were approached to enroll in a study investigating the role of the MSH6 gene in familial colorectal cancer. Patient consent was sought for providing a blood specimen for DNA analysis and review of medical records/tumor specimens and contacting family members to confirm the family history of cancer. Seven predictor variables for enrollment (age, sex, ethnicity, family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative, presence of children, insurance type, and type of visit) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis to determine the effect on decision to enroll. Of 1,111 patients approached, 696 (62.6%) enrolled in the study. Of these approached individuals, 4.2% were of nonwhite ethnicity and 33.5% were age > or =65 years. Patients of white ethnicity [odds ratio (OR), 2.10; P = 0.018], males (OR, 1.47; P = 0.002), those ages < or =65 years (OR, 1.42; P = 0.009), and those with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (OR, 1.57; P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to enroll. Fewer than 4% of all participants denied permission for the study researchers to access information from medical records or to be recontacted by researchers to discuss the enrollment of additional family members. Our data suggest that, once subjects decided to enroll, the majority (88%) was comfortable with consenting to all study components, including the creation of cell lines and future recontact. Low participation rates for ethnic minorities, females, and elderly patients are similar for both cancer genetics and clinical trial studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835336     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  22 in total

1.  Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research.

Authors:  Linus Johnsson; Gert Helgesson; Thorunn Rafnar; Ingibjorg Halldorsdottir; Kee-Seng Chia; Stefan Eriksson; Mats G Hansson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Sex Differences in Willingness to Participate in Research Based on Study Risk Level Among a Community Sample of African Americans in North Central Florida.

Authors:  Ayodeji Otufowora; Yiyang Liu; Henry Young; Kathleen L Egan; Deepthi S Varma; Catherine W Striley; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-02

3.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Inclusion of African Americans in genetic studies: what is the barrier?

Authors:  Sarah M Hartz; Eric O Johnson; Nancy L Saccone; Dorothy Hatsukami; Naomi Breslau; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria Cain; Lori H Erby; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; Eva Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque; Denise M Scott
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  Importance of capacity assessment for an early staged-research network designed to eliminate health disparity: lessons from RTRN.

Authors:  Jae Eun Lee; James Perkins; M Edwina Barnett; Daniel Sarpong; Junghye Sung
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

8.  Characteristics associated with informed consent for genetic studies in the ACCORD trial.

Authors:  Denise G Simons-Morton; Jeffrey C Chan; Angela R Kimel; Peter E Linz; Cynthia L Stowe; John Summerson; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Feasibility Test of a Community-Relevant Intervention Designed to Promote African American Participation in Translational, Breast Cancer Disparities Research: Know About Health Options for Women (Know HOW).

Authors:  Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary; Page Moore; Jerome Turner; Leah Dawson; Seongkum Heo; Paul Greene
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Tamoxifen-induced venothromboembolic events: exploring validation of putative genetic association.

Authors:  Ingrid Glurich; Po-Huang Chyou; Jessica M Engel; Deanna S Cross; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.