Literature DB >> 16834837

The economic burden of gout on an employed population.

Richard A Brook1, Nathan L Kleinman, Pankaj A Patel, Arthur K Melkonian, Truman J Brizee, James E Smeeding, Nancy Joseph-Ridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the economic burden of illness of gout in an employed population, quantifying the impact on employers annual health benefit costs for medical and prescription claims, sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation.
METHODS: Adjudicated claims data from 300000 employees from 2001 through 2004 were utilized. T-tests were used to compare demographic data and medical costs and services by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) diagnostic categories. Two-part models were used to determine average annual health benefit costs overall and medical costs by place of delivery. A risk stratification quintile analysis was also performed utilizing gout-specific medical and pharmaceutical costs.
RESULTS: There were 1171 employees with gout identified (total n = 249 038). All demographic variables between the two groups were statistically different (p <or= 0.05). The total annual cost for the employee with gout versus without gout was $6870 versus $3705, respectively, with significantly higher costs for medical claims, prescription claims, sick leave, short-term disability, and workers' compensation benefits. Costs were significantly higher by location of service for office, outpatient hospital or clinic, inpatient hospital, and laboratory. For the gout cohort, the top major diagnostic category in average cost was 'circulatory system' and in average services was 'endocrine, nutritional, metabolic, and immunologic systems'. Only 0.9% of employees with gout generated 20% of the total gout-specific medical and prescription costs.
CONCLUSION: Gout inflicts a substantial burden of illness upon employers in terms of medical and prescription costs, as well as other work-related benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834837     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X112606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  20 in total

Review 1.  Difficult-to-treat gouty arthritis: a disease warranting better management.

Authors:  Naomi Schlesinger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Identification of Gout Flares in Chief Complaint Text Using Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  John D Osborne; James S Booth; Tobias O'Leary; Amy Mudano; Giovanna Rosas; Phillip J Foster; Kenneth G Saag; Maria I Danila
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 3.  Imaging in gout: A review of the recent developments.

Authors:  Priya Varghese Chowalloor; Teck K Siew; Helen Isobel Keen
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  The Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy Scripts: Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Gout and Hyperuricemia.

Authors:  Youssef M Roman
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Inpatient gout: a review.

Authors:  Mark C Fisher; Michael H Pillinger; Robert T Keenan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Puja P Khanna; John D Fitzgerald; Manjit K Singh; Sangmee Bae; Tuhina Neogi; Michael H Pillinger; Joan Merill; Susan Lee; Shraddha Prakash; Marian Kaldas; Maneesh Gogia; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Will Taylor; Frédéric Lioté; Hyon Choi; Jasvinder A Singh; Nicola Dalbeth; Sanford Kaplan; Vandana Niyyar; Danielle Jones; Steven A Yarows; Blake Roessler; Gail Kerr; Charles King; Gerald Levy; Daniel E Furst; N Lawrence Edwards; Brian Mandell; H Ralph Schumacher; Mark Robbins; Neil Wenger; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of the Economic and Humanistic Burden of Gout.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Stephen M Beard
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Febuxostat: the evidence for its use in the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout.

Authors:  Angelo L Gaffo; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

9.  Cost-effectiveness of febuxostat in chronic gout.

Authors:  Stephen M Beard; Birgitta G von Scheele; George Nuki; Isobel V Pearson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-05-30

Review 10.  Gout. Hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease: how strong is the evidence for a causal link?

Authors:  Angelo L Gaffo; N Lawrence Edwards; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.