Literature DB >> 23719971

Cost-effectiveness of febuxostat in chronic gout.

Stephen M Beard1, Birgitta G von Scheele, George Nuki, Isobel V Pearson.   

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate data on the cost-effectiveness of febuxostat compared with standard clinical practice with allopurinol in patients with gout that was presented to the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) in 2010. A Markov health-state model estimated the direct health-related costs and clinical benefits expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Adults with chronic gout and established hyperuricaemia received treatment sequences of daily doses of allopurinol 300 mg alone or allopurinol 300 mg followed by febuxostat 80 mg/120 mg. The proportion of patients achieving the target serum uric acid (sUA) level of less than 6 mg/dl (0.36 mmol/l) was linked to the utility per sUA level to generate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Second-line therapy with febuxostat 80 mg/120 mg versus with allopurinol alone resulted in an ICER of £3,578 per QALY over a 5-year time horizon. Additional univariate analyses showed that ICER values were robust and ranged from £2,550 to £7,165 per QALY when different parameters (e.g., low- and high-dose allopurinol titrations and variations in treatment-induced flare rates) were varied. Febuxostat reduces sUA below the European League Against Rheumatism target of 0.36 mmol/l (6 mg/dl) in significantly more patients with gout than allopurinol in its most frequently prescribed dose of 300 mg per day. The SMC accepted febuxostat as cost-effective as a suitable second-line option for urate-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with chronic hyperuricaemia in conditions where urate deposition has already occurred (including a history or presence of tophus and/or gouty arthritis) when treatment with allopurinol was inadequate, not tolerated, or contraindicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719971     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0486-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  33 in total

1.  Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case-control study.

Authors:  E Roddy; W Zhang; M Doherty
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout.

Authors:  Kelsey M Jordan; J Stewart Cameron; Michael Snaith; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty; Jonathan Seckl; Aroon Hingorani; Richard Jaques; George Nuki
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  The impact of gout on work absence and productivity.

Authors:  Nathan L Kleinman; Richard A Brook; Pankaj A Patel; Arthur K Melkonian; Truman J Brizee; James E Smeeding; Nancy Joseph-Ridge
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  The economic burden of gout on an employed population.

Authors:  Richard A Brook; Nathan L Kleinman; Pankaj A Patel; Arthur K Melkonian; Truman J Brizee; James E Smeeding; Nancy Joseph-Ridge
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 5.  Febuxostat for the management of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout: a NICE single technology appraisal.

Authors:  Matt Stevenson; Abdullah Pandor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Colchicine for prophylaxis of acute flares when initiating allopurinol for chronic gouty arthritis.

Authors:  Gregory C Borstad; Leslie R Bryant; Michael P Abel; Daren A Scroggie; Mark D Harris; Jeff A Alloway
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial.

Authors:  Michael A Becker; H Ralph Schumacher; Luis R Espinoza; Alvin F Wells; Patricia MacDonald; Eric Lloyd; Christopher Lademacher
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Uric acid level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leo K Niskanen; David E Laaksonen; Kristiina Nyyssönen; Georg Alfthan; Hanna-Maaria Lakka; Timo A Lakka; Jukka T Salonen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-26

9.  Quality of life and disability in patients with treatment-failure gout.

Authors:  Michael A Becker; H Ralph Schumacher; Katy L Benjamin; Peter Gorevic; Maria Greenwald; Jeffrey Fessel; Lawrence Edwards; Ariane K Kawata; Lori Frank; Royce Waltrip; Allan Maroli; Bill Huang; John S Sundy
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000-2005.

Authors:  L Annemans; E Spaepen; M Gaskin; M Bonnemaire; V Malier; T Gilbert; G Nuki
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  18 in total

1.  Prioritizing Future Research on Allopurinol and Febuxostat for the Management of Gout: Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jutkowitz; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Hyon K Choi; Karen M Kuntz; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Febuxostat: a review of its use in the treatment of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  New gout test: enhanced ex vivo cytokine production from PBMCS in common gout patients and a gout patient with Kearns-Sayre syndrome.

Authors:  Tim L Jansen; Dianne Berendsen; Tania O Crisan; Maartje C P Cleophas; Mirian C H Janssen; Leo A B Joosten
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Urate-lowering therapy: current options and future prospects for elderly patients with gout.

Authors:  Lisa K Stamp; Peter T Chapman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Treatment of hyperuricemia in gout: current therapeutic options, latest developments and clinical implications.

Authors:  Sebastian E Sattui; Angelo L Gaffo
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of the Economic and Humanistic Burden of Gout.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Stephen M Beard
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Management of Gout and Hyperuricemia in CKD.

Authors:  Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Goals of gout treatment: a patient perspective.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  New and Pipeline Drugs for Gout.

Authors:  Robert T Keenan; Naomi Schlesinger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*5801 testing in preventing allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN in Thai population.

Authors:  Surasak Saokaew; Wichittra Tassaneeyakul; Ratree Maenthaisong; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.