Literature DB >> 16829010

Distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma: identification of prognostic groups with MR imaging.

Redina Ljumanovic1, Johannes A Langendijk, Otto S Hoekstra, C René Leemans, Jonas A Castelijns.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the prognostic significance of lymph node parameters assessed on pretreatment magnetic resonance (MR) images for development of distant metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretreatment MR images of 311 patients were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of lymph nodes at specific neck node levels as well as the size and the presence of a number of lymph node characteristics including extranodal spread, central necrosis and number and volume of ipsi- and contralateral nodes. Of these patients, 174 (56%) had MRI-positive nodes (defined as nodes with minimum axial diameter >8 and >4 mm for paratracheal level and retropharyngeal nodes).
RESULTS: The 2-year distant-metastasis free survival rate (DMFSR) for patients without MRI-positive nodes was 94% compared to 75% for those patients with MRI-positive nodes. In patients with MRI-positive nodes, results of multivariate analysis with the Cox regression model yielded statistical significance for presence of extranodal spread (ENS), detected on MRI, as the only independent prognostic factor associated with the 2-year DMFSR (p=0.002). Based on the analysis, three risk groups regarding the DMFSR could be identified. Low-risk group (DMFSR:94%) consisted of patients without MRI-positive nodes. Intermediate-risk group (DMFSR:81%) consisted of patients with MRI-positive nodes without ENS. High-risk group (DMFSR:59%) consisted of patients with MRI-positive nodes and ENS as shown on MRI (p<0.0001). Statistical separation for different tumor locations showed MRI-determined ENS (larynx: p=0.05; oropharynx: p=0.04; oral cavity: p<0.001), lowjugular/posterior triangle nodes (oropharynx: p=0.02), paratracheal nodes (larynx: p=0.03), and contralateral node volume >5 cm3 (larynx: p=0.03; oral cavity: p=0.02) to be significant predictors with regard to DMFSR.
CONCLUSION: Especially patients with on MRI demonstrating extranodal spread and with suspicious nodes at lowjugular/posterior triangle (oropharyngeal cancer) or paratracheal level (laryngeal cancer), or with contralateral enlarged nodes (laryngeal and oral cavity cancer) are at high risk for developing distant metastases and this subset of patients might benefit from supplementary imaging screening (CT-chest, PET-scan).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829010     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

Review 1.  Computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A practical approach.

Authors:  Francesco Agnello; Francesco Cupido; Gianvincenzo Sparacia; Federico Midiri; Martina Miroddi; Emanuele Grassedonio; Massimo Galia
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-02-20

2.  Predictive factors for simultaneous distant metastasis in head and neck cancer patients during the diagnostic work-up.

Authors:  Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba; Maria Soriano-Reixach; Ekhiñe Larruscain-Sarasola; Jon Alexander Sistiaga-Suarez; Jose Angel González-García; Amaia Sanchez-Martin; Laura Basterretxea-Badiola; Naiara Sagastibelta; Xabier Altuna-Mariezcurrena
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Evaluating lingual carcinoma for surgical management: what does volumetric measurement with MRI offer?

Authors:  P W Boland; S R Watt-Smith; K Pataridis; C Alvey; S J Golding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Distant metastasis from oral cavity-correlation between histopathology results and primary site.

Authors:  Yuka Uchiyama; Tadashi Sasai; Atsutoshi Nakatani; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Tomomi Tsujimoto; Sven Kreiborg; Shumei Murakami
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Patterns and levels of hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and their relationship to patient outcome.

Authors:  Sydney M Evans; Kevin L Du; Ara A Chalian; Rosemarie Mick; Paul J Zhang; Stephen M Hahn; Harry Quon; Robert Lustig; Gregory S Weinstein; Cameron J Koch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Salivary gland carcinoma: Prediction of cancer death risk based on apparent diffusion coefficient histogram profiles.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Oligometastatic Disease Management: Finding the Sweet Spot.

Authors:  Petr Szturz; Daan Nevens; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Laryngeal cancer: how does the radiologist help?

Authors:  Steve Connor
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI.

Authors:  Minerva Becker; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Pretreatment screening for distant metastases in the Dutch head and neck centers: 10 years later.

Authors:  Asaf Senft; Otto S Hoekstra; Jonas A Castelijns; C René Leemans; Remco de Bree
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.